通过运行前开发者反馈平衡协作机器人的生产力和寿命

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS
Emil Stubbe Kolvig-Raun;Jakob Hviid;Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard;Ralph Brorsen;Peter Jacob
{"title":"通过运行前开发者反馈平衡协作机器人的生产力和寿命","authors":"Emil Stubbe Kolvig-Raun;Jakob Hviid;Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard;Ralph Brorsen;Peter Jacob","doi":"10.1109/LRA.2024.3522836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our experience, the task of optimizing robot longevity and efficiency is challenging due to the limited understanding and awareness developers' have about how their code influences a robot's expected lifespan. Unfortunately, acquiring the necessary information for computations is a complex task, and the data needed for these calculations remains unattainable until after runtime. In software engineering, traditional Static Code Analysis (SCA) techniques are applied to address such challenges. Although effective in identifying software anomalies and inefficiencies without execution, current SCA techniques do not adequately address the unique requirements of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) in robotics. In this study, we propose a novel Machine Learning (ML) approach to assess robot program lines, considering the balance between speed and lifespan. Our solution, trained on data from 1325 operational collaborative robots (cobots) from the Universal Robots (UR) e-Series, classifies program lines concerning the expected lifespan of the robot, considering program line arguments, expected resource usage, and asserted joint stress. The model achieves a worst-case accuracy of 90.43% through 10-fold cross-validation with a 50% data split. We also present a selection of programming lines illustrating various robot program cases and an example of longevity improvement. Finally, we publish a dataset containing 56405 unique program line executions, aiming to enhance the sustainability and efficiency of robotic systems and support future research.","PeriodicalId":13241,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","volume":"10 2","pages":"1617-1624"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Cobot Productivity and Longevity Through Pre-Runtime Developer Feedback\",\"authors\":\"Emil Stubbe Kolvig-Raun;Jakob Hviid;Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard;Ralph Brorsen;Peter Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LRA.2024.3522836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our experience, the task of optimizing robot longevity and efficiency is challenging due to the limited understanding and awareness developers' have about how their code influences a robot's expected lifespan. Unfortunately, acquiring the necessary information for computations is a complex task, and the data needed for these calculations remains unattainable until after runtime. In software engineering, traditional Static Code Analysis (SCA) techniques are applied to address such challenges. Although effective in identifying software anomalies and inefficiencies without execution, current SCA techniques do not adequately address the unique requirements of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) in robotics. In this study, we propose a novel Machine Learning (ML) approach to assess robot program lines, considering the balance between speed and lifespan. Our solution, trained on data from 1325 operational collaborative robots (cobots) from the Universal Robots (UR) e-Series, classifies program lines concerning the expected lifespan of the robot, considering program line arguments, expected resource usage, and asserted joint stress. The model achieves a worst-case accuracy of 90.43% through 10-fold cross-validation with a 50% data split. We also present a selection of programming lines illustrating various robot program cases and an example of longevity improvement. Finally, we publish a dataset containing 56405 unique program line executions, aiming to enhance the sustainability and efficiency of robotic systems and support future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"1617-1624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10816391/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10816391/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据我们的经验,优化机器人寿命和效率的任务是具有挑战性的,因为开发人员对他们的代码如何影响机器人的预期寿命的理解和意识有限。不幸的是,获取计算所需的信息是一项复杂的任务,并且这些计算所需的数据直到运行时之后才能获得。在软件工程中,传统的静态代码分析(SCA)技术被用于解决此类挑战。虽然在没有执行的情况下有效地识别软件异常和低效率,但当前的SCA技术不能充分解决机器人技术中网络物理系统(cps)的独特需求。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新的机器学习(ML)方法来评估机器人程序线,考虑速度和寿命之间的平衡。我们的解决方案,训练了来自Universal robots (UR) e系列的1325个操作协作机器人(cobots)的数据,根据机器人的预期寿命对程序线进行分类,考虑程序线参数、预期资源使用和断言的关节应力。该模型通过10次交叉验证和50%的数据分割,达到了90.43%的最坏情况准确率。我们还提供了一些编程线的选择,说明了各种机器人的程序案例和一个寿命改善的例子。最后,我们发布了一个包含56405个独特程序行执行的数据集,旨在提高机器人系统的可持续性和效率,并支持未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Cobot Productivity and Longevity Through Pre-Runtime Developer Feedback
In our experience, the task of optimizing robot longevity and efficiency is challenging due to the limited understanding and awareness developers' have about how their code influences a robot's expected lifespan. Unfortunately, acquiring the necessary information for computations is a complex task, and the data needed for these calculations remains unattainable until after runtime. In software engineering, traditional Static Code Analysis (SCA) techniques are applied to address such challenges. Although effective in identifying software anomalies and inefficiencies without execution, current SCA techniques do not adequately address the unique requirements of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) in robotics. In this study, we propose a novel Machine Learning (ML) approach to assess robot program lines, considering the balance between speed and lifespan. Our solution, trained on data from 1325 operational collaborative robots (cobots) from the Universal Robots (UR) e-Series, classifies program lines concerning the expected lifespan of the robot, considering program line arguments, expected resource usage, and asserted joint stress. The model achieves a worst-case accuracy of 90.43% through 10-fold cross-validation with a 50% data split. We also present a selection of programming lines illustrating various robot program cases and an example of longevity improvement. Finally, we publish a dataset containing 56405 unique program line executions, aiming to enhance the sustainability and efficiency of robotic systems and support future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1428
期刊介绍: The scope of this journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles that provide a timely and concise account of innovative research ideas and application results, reporting significant theoretical findings and application case studies in areas of robotics and automation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信