同种异体骨软骨移植作为膝关节指数软骨手术失败后的修复手术:系统回顾

Varun Gopinatth, Sina Tartibi, Matthew V. Smith, Matthew J. Matava, Robert H. Brophy, Derrick M. Knapik
{"title":"同种异体骨软骨移植作为膝关节指数软骨手术失败后的修复手术:系统回顾","authors":"Varun Gopinatth, Sina Tartibi, Matthew V. Smith, Matthew J. Matava, Robert H. Brophy, Derrick M. Knapik","doi":"10.1177/03635465241238466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is well established as a viable chondral restoration procedure for the treatment of symptomatic, focal chondral defects of the knee. The efficacy of secondary OCA in the setting of failed index cartilage repair or restoration is poorly understood.Purpose:To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes, failures, and reoperations after OCA after failed index cartilage repair or restoration of the knee.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases from inception through September 2023 to identify studies reporting on outcomes of patients undergoing OCA after failed index chondral repair or restoration.Results:A total of 6 studies, entailing 349 patients, met inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 34.6 ± 10.2 years. The mean chondral defect size at the time of secondary OCA was 5.8 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (range, 4.0-9.5 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), and the most common defect location was the medial femoral condyle (53.6%; n = 171/319). The most common index chondral procedures were marrow stimulation (73.8%; n = 256/347 patients), OCA (11.8%; n = 41/347), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (4.9%; n = 17/347). The overall failure rate after secondary OCA was 16.6% (95% CI, 8.8%-24.4%). The overall reoperation rate was 42.8% (95% CI, 31.7%-53.9%). Failure and reoperation rates were associated with increasing chondral defect size ( P &lt; .01). Defects 9-10 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> had a reoperation rate of 67% and a failure rate of 39%. The 5-year survival rate after secondary OCA was 79% to 87.8%, and the 10-year survival rate was 61% to 82%. A total of 42 clinical outcome scores were reported, and 71.0% (n = 22/31) of patient-reported outcome measures yielded significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels for patients undergoing secondary OCA.Conclusion:After index chondral surgery, the overall failure rate after secondary OCA was 16.6%, with an overall reoperation rate of 42.8%. The majority of clinical outcomes reported suggest improvement when compared with preoperative values. Larger chondral defects may be associated with higher rates of failure and reoperation.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation as a Salvage Procedure After Failed Index Cartilage Surgery of the Knee: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Varun Gopinatth, Sina Tartibi, Matthew V. Smith, Matthew J. Matava, Robert H. Brophy, Derrick M. Knapik\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241238466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is well established as a viable chondral restoration procedure for the treatment of symptomatic, focal chondral defects of the knee. The efficacy of secondary OCA in the setting of failed index cartilage repair or restoration is poorly understood.Purpose:To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes, failures, and reoperations after OCA after failed index cartilage repair or restoration of the knee.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases from inception through September 2023 to identify studies reporting on outcomes of patients undergoing OCA after failed index chondral repair or restoration.Results:A total of 6 studies, entailing 349 patients, met inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 34.6 ± 10.2 years. The mean chondral defect size at the time of secondary OCA was 5.8 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (range, 4.0-9.5 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), and the most common defect location was the medial femoral condyle (53.6%; n = 171/319). The most common index chondral procedures were marrow stimulation (73.8%; n = 256/347 patients), OCA (11.8%; n = 41/347), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (4.9%; n = 17/347). The overall failure rate after secondary OCA was 16.6% (95% CI, 8.8%-24.4%). The overall reoperation rate was 42.8% (95% CI, 31.7%-53.9%). Failure and reoperation rates were associated with increasing chondral defect size ( P &lt; .01). Defects 9-10 cm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> had a reoperation rate of 67% and a failure rate of 39%. The 5-year survival rate after secondary OCA was 79% to 87.8%, and the 10-year survival rate was 61% to 82%. A total of 42 clinical outcome scores were reported, and 71.0% (n = 22/31) of patient-reported outcome measures yielded significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels for patients undergoing secondary OCA.Conclusion:After index chondral surgery, the overall failure rate after secondary OCA was 16.6%, with an overall reoperation rate of 42.8%. The majority of clinical outcomes reported suggest improvement when compared with preoperative values. Larger chondral defects may be associated with higher rates of failure and reoperation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241238466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241238466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨软骨同种异体移植(OCA)是一种可行的软骨修复方法,可用于治疗症状性膝关节局灶性软骨缺损。继发性OCA在指数软骨修复或恢复失败的情况下的疗效尚不清楚。目的:评价膝关节食指软骨修复或复位失败后OCA的影像学和临床结果、失败和再手术。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:根据2020年PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价。通过查询PubMed、MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane中央对照试验注册数据库,从成立到2023年9月进行文献检索,以确定报告在索引软骨修复或修复失败后接受OCA的患者结果的研究。结果:共有6项研究,349例患者符合纳入标准。患者平均年龄34.6±10.2岁。继发性OCA时软骨缺损的平均大小为5.8 cm2(范围为4.0-9.5 cm2),最常见的缺损部位为股骨内侧髁(53.6%;N = 171/319)。最常见的指数软骨手术是骨髓刺激(73.8%);n = 256/347例患者),OCA (11.8%;N = 41/347),自体软骨细胞植入(4.9%;N = 17/347)。继发性OCA后的总失败率为16.6% (95% CI, 8.8%-24.4%)。总再手术率为42.8% (95% CI, 31.7% ~ 53.9%)。失败和再手术率与软骨缺损大小的增加有关(P <;. 01)。缺损9-10 cm2的再手术率为67%,不良率为39%。继发性OCA后5年生存率为79% ~ 87.8%,10年生存率为61% ~ 82%。总共报告了42个临床结果评分,71.0% (n = 22/31)的患者报告的结果测量显示,继发性OCA患者的术前至术后水平有显著改善。结论:指数软骨手术后继发性OCA总失败率为16.6%,总再手术率为42.8%。大多数临床结果报告表明,与术前值相比,改善。较大的软骨缺损可能与较高的失败率和再手术率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation as a Salvage Procedure After Failed Index Cartilage Surgery of the Knee: A Systematic Review
Background:Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is well established as a viable chondral restoration procedure for the treatment of symptomatic, focal chondral defects of the knee. The efficacy of secondary OCA in the setting of failed index cartilage repair or restoration is poorly understood.Purpose:To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes, failures, and reoperations after OCA after failed index cartilage repair or restoration of the knee.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases from inception through September 2023 to identify studies reporting on outcomes of patients undergoing OCA after failed index chondral repair or restoration.Results:A total of 6 studies, entailing 349 patients, met inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 34.6 ± 10.2 years. The mean chondral defect size at the time of secondary OCA was 5.8 cm2 (range, 4.0-9.5 cm2), and the most common defect location was the medial femoral condyle (53.6%; n = 171/319). The most common index chondral procedures were marrow stimulation (73.8%; n = 256/347 patients), OCA (11.8%; n = 41/347), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (4.9%; n = 17/347). The overall failure rate after secondary OCA was 16.6% (95% CI, 8.8%-24.4%). The overall reoperation rate was 42.8% (95% CI, 31.7%-53.9%). Failure and reoperation rates were associated with increasing chondral defect size ( P < .01). Defects 9-10 cm2 had a reoperation rate of 67% and a failure rate of 39%. The 5-year survival rate after secondary OCA was 79% to 87.8%, and the 10-year survival rate was 61% to 82%. A total of 42 clinical outcome scores were reported, and 71.0% (n = 22/31) of patient-reported outcome measures yielded significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels for patients undergoing secondary OCA.Conclusion:After index chondral surgery, the overall failure rate after secondary OCA was 16.6%, with an overall reoperation rate of 42.8%. The majority of clinical outcomes reported suggest improvement when compared with preoperative values. Larger chondral defects may be associated with higher rates of failure and reoperation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信