玉米与蚕豆间作的产量和磷含量在低磷投入下通过种间地下互作提高,在高磷投入下通过地上互作提高

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yi Zhang, Wenhao Zhu, Lanyan Luo, Hans Lambers, Chaochun Zhang
{"title":"玉米与蚕豆间作的产量和磷含量在低磷投入下通过种间地下互作提高,在高磷投入下通过地上互作提高","authors":"Yi Zhang, Wenhao Zhu, Lanyan Luo, Hans Lambers, Chaochun Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07168-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>Many studies used physical barriers to separate the roots of different species to dissect the contributions of above- and below-ground interspecies interactions to yield and phosphorus (P) uptake. However, the extent to which the presence of barriers itself alters these contributions remains unknown.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The field study, conducted in 2010 and 2011, used root barriers in both sole cropped and intercropped maize at two P levels. We examined the contributions of interspecies interactions to yield, biomass and P content in all treatments. The field experiment followed a split plot design with two P levels (P0: 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, and P35: 35 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup>), three cropping systems (sole maize, sole faba bean and maize/faba bean intercropping), and two types of root separation (solid barrier -SB- and no barrier -NB-).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The presence of a solid barrier negatively impacted the yield of sole maize, reducing it by 26% in 2010 and by 56% in 2011 compared with conditions without a barrier, indicating that the barrier itself adversely affected the growth of sole maize. Notwithstanding the barrier's influence, the belowground interspecies interactions were the primary contributors to the increased grain yield and P content observed in maize/faba bean intercropping under the P0 treatment. In contrast, aboveground interactions were more significant in enhancing the performance of the intercropping system at the P35 treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Phosphorus fertilization diminished the effects of belowground interspecies interactions while amplifying the impact of aboveground interspecies interaction on the advantages of intercropping, regarding grain yield and P uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The yield and phosphorus content of maize intercropped with faba bean are enhanced by belowground interspecies interactions at low phosphorus input and by aboveground interactions at high phosphorus input\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang, Wenhao Zhu, Lanyan Luo, Hans Lambers, Chaochun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07168-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims</h3><p>Many studies used physical barriers to separate the roots of different species to dissect the contributions of above- and below-ground interspecies interactions to yield and phosphorus (P) uptake. However, the extent to which the presence of barriers itself alters these contributions remains unknown.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>The field study, conducted in 2010 and 2011, used root barriers in both sole cropped and intercropped maize at two P levels. We examined the contributions of interspecies interactions to yield, biomass and P content in all treatments. The field experiment followed a split plot design with two P levels (P0: 0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, and P35: 35 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup>), three cropping systems (sole maize, sole faba bean and maize/faba bean intercropping), and two types of root separation (solid barrier -SB- and no barrier -NB-).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The presence of a solid barrier negatively impacted the yield of sole maize, reducing it by 26% in 2010 and by 56% in 2011 compared with conditions without a barrier, indicating that the barrier itself adversely affected the growth of sole maize. Notwithstanding the barrier's influence, the belowground interspecies interactions were the primary contributors to the increased grain yield and P content observed in maize/faba bean intercropping under the P0 treatment. In contrast, aboveground interactions were more significant in enhancing the performance of the intercropping system at the P35 treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Phosphorus fertilization diminished the effects of belowground interspecies interactions while amplifying the impact of aboveground interspecies interaction on the advantages of intercropping, regarding grain yield and P uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07168-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07168-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的许多研究使用物理屏障将不同物种的根分开,以分析地上和地下物种间相互作用对产量和磷吸收的贡献。然而,障碍本身的存在在多大程度上改变了这些贡献仍然未知。方法在2010年和2011年进行的田间研究中,对单作玉米和间作玉米在两种磷水平下采用根系屏障。我们研究了所有处理下种间相互作用对产量、生物量和磷含量的贡献。田间试验采用2个磷水平(P0: 0 kg hm2 - 1, P35: 35 kg hm2 - 1)、3种种植制度(单玉米、单蚕豆和玉米/蚕豆间作)和2种根系分离方式(固体屏障- sb -和无屏障- nb -)的分畦设计。结果固体屏障的存在对鞋底玉米的产量产生了负面影响,与没有屏障的条件相比,2010年和2011年的产量分别下降了26%和56%,表明屏障本身对鞋底玉米的生长产生了不利影响。尽管存在屏障的影响,但P0处理下玉米/蚕豆间作籽粒产量和磷含量增加的主要原因是地下种间相互作用。而在P35处理下,地上互作对间作系统的增产作用更为显著。结论施磷肥降低了地下种间相互作用的影响,而放大了地上种间相互作用对间作优势的影响,包括籽粒产量和磷吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The yield and phosphorus content of maize intercropped with faba bean are enhanced by belowground interspecies interactions at low phosphorus input and by aboveground interactions at high phosphorus input

Aims

Many studies used physical barriers to separate the roots of different species to dissect the contributions of above- and below-ground interspecies interactions to yield and phosphorus (P) uptake. However, the extent to which the presence of barriers itself alters these contributions remains unknown.

Methods

The field study, conducted in 2010 and 2011, used root barriers in both sole cropped and intercropped maize at two P levels. We examined the contributions of interspecies interactions to yield, biomass and P content in all treatments. The field experiment followed a split plot design with two P levels (P0: 0 kg ha−1, and P35: 35 kg P ha−1), three cropping systems (sole maize, sole faba bean and maize/faba bean intercropping), and two types of root separation (solid barrier -SB- and no barrier -NB-).

Results

The presence of a solid barrier negatively impacted the yield of sole maize, reducing it by 26% in 2010 and by 56% in 2011 compared with conditions without a barrier, indicating that the barrier itself adversely affected the growth of sole maize. Notwithstanding the barrier's influence, the belowground interspecies interactions were the primary contributors to the increased grain yield and P content observed in maize/faba bean intercropping under the P0 treatment. In contrast, aboveground interactions were more significant in enhancing the performance of the intercropping system at the P35 treatment.

Conclusions

Phosphorus fertilization diminished the effects of belowground interspecies interactions while amplifying the impact of aboveground interspecies interaction on the advantages of intercropping, regarding grain yield and P uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信