基于遥感和i-Tree生态的城市森林和生态系统服务评价系统综述

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Gunjan Sharma, Justin Morgenroth, Daniel R. Richards, Ning Ye
{"title":"基于遥感和i-Tree生态的城市森林和生态系统服务评价系统综述","authors":"Gunjan Sharma, Justin Morgenroth, Daniel R. Richards, Ning Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban forests support the health and well-being of billions of people living in cities globally. To better manage urban forests, it is crucial to assess their ecosystem services. This systematic review analyzes two established urban forest assessment approaches—i-Tree Eco and remote sensing—which have developed independently but hold significant potential for integration. The review, comprising the years 2008 to 2022, evaluates the current status of both methods in assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services, highlighting opportunities for synergy. The literature shows that while both approaches primarily focus on regulatory services, remote sensing offers more versatile tools for assessing a broader range of ecosystem services beyond i-Tree's standardized scope. Remote sensing holds potential to enhance i-Tree Eco by providing structural and location-specific data at scale, albeit with varying accuracies. Studies have shown that LiDAR data reliably derives tree height and crown width, and that, in combination with multispectral and hyperspectral imagery, it enhances species identification. Additionally, mobile, and terrestrial laser scanners accurately estimate diameter at breast height. However, gaps remain in using remote sensing to assess crown characteristics like crown missing and dieback, which, though not critical, are useful for enhancing ecosystem service estimates in i-Tree Eco. Despite the potential of remote sensing to automate urban tree inventories, limited research has shown its successful integration with i-Tree Eco. Future research should standardize remote sensing techniques for assessing tree crown health. Additionally, further work is needed on quantifying differences between remote sensing and groundbased measurements, with the aim of evaluating uncertainty levels and understanding how these uncertainties impact the reliability and usefulness of data for policymaking and planning.","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing urban forest and ecosystem service assessment through the integration of remote sensing and i-Tree Eco: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Gunjan Sharma, Justin Morgenroth, Daniel R. Richards, Ning Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban forests support the health and well-being of billions of people living in cities globally. To better manage urban forests, it is crucial to assess their ecosystem services. This systematic review analyzes two established urban forest assessment approaches—i-Tree Eco and remote sensing—which have developed independently but hold significant potential for integration. The review, comprising the years 2008 to 2022, evaluates the current status of both methods in assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services, highlighting opportunities for synergy. The literature shows that while both approaches primarily focus on regulatory services, remote sensing offers more versatile tools for assessing a broader range of ecosystem services beyond i-Tree's standardized scope. Remote sensing holds potential to enhance i-Tree Eco by providing structural and location-specific data at scale, albeit with varying accuracies. Studies have shown that LiDAR data reliably derives tree height and crown width, and that, in combination with multispectral and hyperspectral imagery, it enhances species identification. Additionally, mobile, and terrestrial laser scanners accurately estimate diameter at breast height. However, gaps remain in using remote sensing to assess crown characteristics like crown missing and dieback, which, though not critical, are useful for enhancing ecosystem service estimates in i-Tree Eco. Despite the potential of remote sensing to automate urban tree inventories, limited research has shown its successful integration with i-Tree Eco. Future research should standardize remote sensing techniques for assessing tree crown health. Additionally, further work is needed on quantifying differences between remote sensing and groundbased measurements, with the aim of evaluating uncertainty levels and understanding how these uncertainties impact the reliability and usefulness of data for policymaking and planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128659\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市森林为全球数十亿城市居民的健康和福祉提供支持。为了更好地管理城市森林,评估其生态系统服务是至关重要的。本文系统分析了两种独立发展但具有重要整合潜力的城市森林评价方法——树木生态和遥感。该审查包括2008年至2022年,评估了两种方法在评估城市森林结构和生态系统服务方面的现状,强调了协同作用的机会。文献表明,虽然这两种方法主要侧重于监管服务,但遥感为评估i-Tree标准化范围之外的更广泛的生态系统服务提供了更多功能的工具。尽管精度不同,但遥感通过提供大规模的结构和特定位置数据,具有增强i-Tree Eco的潜力。研究表明,激光雷达数据可以可靠地提取树木高度和树冠宽度,并且与多光谱和高光谱图像相结合,可以增强物种识别。此外,移动和地面激光扫描仪可以准确地估计乳房高度处的直径。然而,在利用遥感技术评估树冠缺失和枯梢等树冠特征方面仍然存在差距,这些特征虽然不是关键,但对提高i-Tree生态系统服务评估有用。尽管遥感有可能实现城市树木清单的自动化,但有限的研究表明它与i-Tree Eco的成功整合。未来的研究应使评估树冠健康的遥感技术标准化。此外,还需要进一步开展工作,量化遥感和地面测量之间的差异,以评估不确定性水平并了解这些不确定性如何影响决策和规划数据的可靠性和有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing urban forest and ecosystem service assessment through the integration of remote sensing and i-Tree Eco: A systematic review
Urban forests support the health and well-being of billions of people living in cities globally. To better manage urban forests, it is crucial to assess their ecosystem services. This systematic review analyzes two established urban forest assessment approaches—i-Tree Eco and remote sensing—which have developed independently but hold significant potential for integration. The review, comprising the years 2008 to 2022, evaluates the current status of both methods in assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services, highlighting opportunities for synergy. The literature shows that while both approaches primarily focus on regulatory services, remote sensing offers more versatile tools for assessing a broader range of ecosystem services beyond i-Tree's standardized scope. Remote sensing holds potential to enhance i-Tree Eco by providing structural and location-specific data at scale, albeit with varying accuracies. Studies have shown that LiDAR data reliably derives tree height and crown width, and that, in combination with multispectral and hyperspectral imagery, it enhances species identification. Additionally, mobile, and terrestrial laser scanners accurately estimate diameter at breast height. However, gaps remain in using remote sensing to assess crown characteristics like crown missing and dieback, which, though not critical, are useful for enhancing ecosystem service estimates in i-Tree Eco. Despite the potential of remote sensing to automate urban tree inventories, limited research has shown its successful integration with i-Tree Eco. Future research should standardize remote sensing techniques for assessing tree crown health. Additionally, further work is needed on quantifying differences between remote sensing and groundbased measurements, with the aim of evaluating uncertainty levels and understanding how these uncertainties impact the reliability and usefulness of data for policymaking and planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信