基于滑坡密度优化Newmark模型的地震滑坡风险评价——来自青藏高原东部鲜水河断裂带的新认识

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Caihong Li, Changbao Guo, Xujiao Zhang, Xue Li, Yiqiu Yan
{"title":"基于滑坡密度优化Newmark模型的地震滑坡风险评价——来自青藏高原东部鲜水河断裂带的新认识","authors":"Caihong Li,&nbsp;Changbao Guo,&nbsp;Xujiao Zhang,&nbsp;Xue Li,&nbsp;Yiqiu Yan","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12056-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The potential hazard of seismic landslides is notably high within active fault zones, currently, the commonly used Newmark model for seismic landslide risk assessment often predicts cumulative displacement that are lower than the actual displacement, In order to enhance the earthquake landslide risk assessment accuracy, a new LS-D-Newmark (Landslide density Newmark) model, which considers the attenuation of geotechnical mechanical parameters in areas with different historical landslide densities, is proposed to evaluate the potential seismic landslide hazard. The Xianshuihe fault zone in the eastern Tibetan Plateau was selected as an example, a historical landslide database was established based on fault activity, field investigation, multi-source remote sensing and InSAR monitoring. The landslide hazards in the Xianshuihe fault zone are distributed linearly along the fault zone and are more concentrated at the intersection of the faults. The results of potential seismic landslide risk assessment based on LS-D-Newmark model show that its prediction accuracy (<i>AUC</i> value) increased from 0.78 to 0.84, a 7.69% improvement compared to the traditional Newmark model. Using the spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake for verification, and it was found that 75.87% of the landslides were located in the extremely high risk areas and high risk areas predicted by the LS-D-Newmark model, which is consistent with the actual distribution of landslides. The proposed LS-D-Newmark model effectively resolves the issue of underestimating displacement predictions, enhancing the accuracy of potential seismic landslide risk assessments, and provides an important reference for major project planning and construction as well as disaster prevention and mitigation in the region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic landslide risk assessment based on landslide density optimized Newmark model: new insights from the Xianshuihe fault zone in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China\",\"authors\":\"Caihong Li,&nbsp;Changbao Guo,&nbsp;Xujiao Zhang,&nbsp;Xue Li,&nbsp;Yiqiu Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-12056-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The potential hazard of seismic landslides is notably high within active fault zones, currently, the commonly used Newmark model for seismic landslide risk assessment often predicts cumulative displacement that are lower than the actual displacement, In order to enhance the earthquake landslide risk assessment accuracy, a new LS-D-Newmark (Landslide density Newmark) model, which considers the attenuation of geotechnical mechanical parameters in areas with different historical landslide densities, is proposed to evaluate the potential seismic landslide hazard. The Xianshuihe fault zone in the eastern Tibetan Plateau was selected as an example, a historical landslide database was established based on fault activity, field investigation, multi-source remote sensing and InSAR monitoring. The landslide hazards in the Xianshuihe fault zone are distributed linearly along the fault zone and are more concentrated at the intersection of the faults. The results of potential seismic landslide risk assessment based on LS-D-Newmark model show that its prediction accuracy (<i>AUC</i> value) increased from 0.78 to 0.84, a 7.69% improvement compared to the traditional Newmark model. Using the spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake for verification, and it was found that 75.87% of the landslides were located in the extremely high risk areas and high risk areas predicted by the LS-D-Newmark model, which is consistent with the actual distribution of landslides. The proposed LS-D-Newmark model effectively resolves the issue of underestimating displacement predictions, enhancing the accuracy of potential seismic landslide risk assessments, and provides an important reference for major project planning and construction as well as disaster prevention and mitigation in the region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12056-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12056-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在活动断裂带内,地震滑坡的潜在危险性非常高,目前常用的地震滑坡风险评估Newmark模型预测的累积位移往往低于实际位移,为了提高地震滑坡风险评估的精度,提出了一种新的LS-D-Newmark(滑坡密度Newmark)模型,提出了考虑不同历史滑坡密度地区岩土力学参数衰减的地震滑坡危险性评价方法。以青藏高原东部鲜水河断裂带为例,基于断层活动性、野外调查、多源遥感和InSAR监测,建立了历史滑坡数据库。鲜水河断裂带滑坡灾害沿断裂带呈线性分布,多集中在断裂带交接处。基于LS-D-Newmark模型的地震滑坡潜在风险评价结果表明,其预测精度(AUC值)从0.78提高到0.84,比传统的Newmark模型提高了7.69%。利用2022年泸定6.8级地震引发滑坡的空间特征进行验证,发现75.87%的滑坡位于LS-D-Newmark模型预测的极高风险区和高风险区,与滑坡的实际分布相一致。提出的LS-D-Newmark模型有效解决了位移预测低估的问题,提高了潜在地震滑坡风险评估的准确性,为该地区重大工程规划建设和防灾减灾提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic landslide risk assessment based on landslide density optimized Newmark model: new insights from the Xianshuihe fault zone in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China

The potential hazard of seismic landslides is notably high within active fault zones, currently, the commonly used Newmark model for seismic landslide risk assessment often predicts cumulative displacement that are lower than the actual displacement, In order to enhance the earthquake landslide risk assessment accuracy, a new LS-D-Newmark (Landslide density Newmark) model, which considers the attenuation of geotechnical mechanical parameters in areas with different historical landslide densities, is proposed to evaluate the potential seismic landslide hazard. The Xianshuihe fault zone in the eastern Tibetan Plateau was selected as an example, a historical landslide database was established based on fault activity, field investigation, multi-source remote sensing and InSAR monitoring. The landslide hazards in the Xianshuihe fault zone are distributed linearly along the fault zone and are more concentrated at the intersection of the faults. The results of potential seismic landslide risk assessment based on LS-D-Newmark model show that its prediction accuracy (AUC value) increased from 0.78 to 0.84, a 7.69% improvement compared to the traditional Newmark model. Using the spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake for verification, and it was found that 75.87% of the landslides were located in the extremely high risk areas and high risk areas predicted by the LS-D-Newmark model, which is consistent with the actual distribution of landslides. The proposed LS-D-Newmark model effectively resolves the issue of underestimating displacement predictions, enhancing the accuracy of potential seismic landslide risk assessments, and provides an important reference for major project planning and construction as well as disaster prevention and mitigation in the region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信