生物成膜细菌对制革废水的有效处理及其毒性评价

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Annapurna Maurya, Rajesh Kumar, Abhay Raj
{"title":"生物成膜细菌对制革废水的有效处理及其毒性评价","authors":"Annapurna Maurya,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar,&nbsp;Abhay Raj","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07714-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the treatment efficiency of biofilm immobilized MBBR (moving bed biofilm reactor) system for tannery effluent compared to suspended cells system. A mixed culture of biofilm-forming strains <i>Bacillus vallismortis, Bacillus haynesii, Alcaligenes aquatilis,</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> showed increased biofilm formation and Cr(VI) reduction compared to individual strains. The MBBR carriers were shown to have a greater biofilm formation (cell viability = 8.255 log units) and EPS yield (58 mg/g total solids) compared to the PUF (polyurethane foam) carriers (cell viability = 6.806 log units, and EPS yield = 36.4 mg/g total solids). The COD removal efficiency of the biofilm immobilized MBBR was higher (82.5%) compared to suspended cells treatment (61.3%) in the fed-batch treatment method. GC–MS analysis showed that 2,6-Bis(tert-butyl) phenol and 1-monopalmitin compounds were either diminished or transformed during treatment with biofilm immobilized MBBR. Furthermore, phytotoxicity and genotoxicity tests confirmed the lower toxicity of biofilm stabilized MBBR treated effluent compared to treated suspended cells on fenugreek plant and <i>Allium cepa</i> L. roots, respectively. The study indicates that treating tannery effluent with a mixed culture of <i>B. vallismortis, B. haynesii, A. aquatilis,</i> and <i>E. faecium</i> immobilized on MBBR effectively removes both organic and inorganic contaminants along with genotoxic effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Treatment of Tannery Effluent by Biofilm-Forming Bacteria and Evaluation of their Toxicity Reduction\",\"authors\":\"Annapurna Maurya,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar,&nbsp;Abhay Raj\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07714-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the treatment efficiency of biofilm immobilized MBBR (moving bed biofilm reactor) system for tannery effluent compared to suspended cells system. A mixed culture of biofilm-forming strains <i>Bacillus vallismortis, Bacillus haynesii, Alcaligenes aquatilis,</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> showed increased biofilm formation and Cr(VI) reduction compared to individual strains. The MBBR carriers were shown to have a greater biofilm formation (cell viability = 8.255 log units) and EPS yield (58 mg/g total solids) compared to the PUF (polyurethane foam) carriers (cell viability = 6.806 log units, and EPS yield = 36.4 mg/g total solids). The COD removal efficiency of the biofilm immobilized MBBR was higher (82.5%) compared to suspended cells treatment (61.3%) in the fed-batch treatment method. GC–MS analysis showed that 2,6-Bis(tert-butyl) phenol and 1-monopalmitin compounds were either diminished or transformed during treatment with biofilm immobilized MBBR. Furthermore, phytotoxicity and genotoxicity tests confirmed the lower toxicity of biofilm stabilized MBBR treated effluent compared to treated suspended cells on fenugreek plant and <i>Allium cepa</i> L. roots, respectively. The study indicates that treating tannery effluent with a mixed culture of <i>B. vallismortis, B. haynesii, A. aquatilis,</i> and <i>E. faecium</i> immobilized on MBBR effectively removes both organic and inorganic contaminants along with genotoxic effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07714-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07714-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了生物膜固定化移动床生物膜反应器(MBBR)系统与悬浮细胞系统对制革废水的处理效果。与单个菌株相比,混合培养的生物膜形成菌株瓦利森芽孢杆菌、海恩氏芽孢杆菌、水生碱性芽孢杆菌和屎肠球菌的生物膜形成和Cr(VI)的降低都有所增加。与PUF(聚氨酯泡沫)载体(细胞活力= 6.806 log单位,EPS产率= 36.4 mg/g总固体)相比,MBBR载体具有更大的生物膜形成(细胞活力= 8.255 log单位)和EPS产率(58 mg/g总固体)。生物膜固定化MBBR对COD的去除率为82.5%,高于间歇投料法中悬浮细胞处理的61.3%。GC-MS分析表明,在生物膜固定化MBBR处理过程中,2,6-双(叔丁基)苯酚和1-单almitin化合物或减少或转化。此外,植物毒性和遗传毒性试验证实,与处理过的悬浮细胞相比,生物膜稳定的MBBR处理过的废水对葫芦巴植物和葱根的毒性分别较低。研究表明,在MBBR上固定化布氏芽孢杆菌、海氏芽孢杆菌、水生芽孢杆菌和粪芽孢杆菌的混合培养物处理制革废水,可以有效去除有机和无机污染物以及遗传毒性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective Treatment of Tannery Effluent by Biofilm-Forming Bacteria and Evaluation of their Toxicity Reduction

This study investigates the treatment efficiency of biofilm immobilized MBBR (moving bed biofilm reactor) system for tannery effluent compared to suspended cells system. A mixed culture of biofilm-forming strains Bacillus vallismortis, Bacillus haynesii, Alcaligenes aquatilis, and Enterococcus faecium showed increased biofilm formation and Cr(VI) reduction compared to individual strains. The MBBR carriers were shown to have a greater biofilm formation (cell viability = 8.255 log units) and EPS yield (58 mg/g total solids) compared to the PUF (polyurethane foam) carriers (cell viability = 6.806 log units, and EPS yield = 36.4 mg/g total solids). The COD removal efficiency of the biofilm immobilized MBBR was higher (82.5%) compared to suspended cells treatment (61.3%) in the fed-batch treatment method. GC–MS analysis showed that 2,6-Bis(tert-butyl) phenol and 1-monopalmitin compounds were either diminished or transformed during treatment with biofilm immobilized MBBR. Furthermore, phytotoxicity and genotoxicity tests confirmed the lower toxicity of biofilm stabilized MBBR treated effluent compared to treated suspended cells on fenugreek plant and Allium cepa L. roots, respectively. The study indicates that treating tannery effluent with a mixed culture of B. vallismortis, B. haynesii, A. aquatilis, and E. faecium immobilized on MBBR effectively removes both organic and inorganic contaminants along with genotoxic effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信