{"title":"回复A. G. Davies关于“朱诺/JIRAM探测到木卫一热点分布”的评论","authors":"F. Zambon, A. Mura, F. Tosi","doi":"10.1029/2024GL112921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zambon et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl100597) presented a catalog of Io hot spots based on JIRAM M-band images acquired in Juno orbits 10 to 33. They identified 242 hot spots, including 23 not previously reported in other catalogs, observing a higher hot spot number density in the northern polar region. Davies (2024) disputes location and counting of part of these hot spots, attributing the differences between the Zambon et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl100597) results and those obtained by Davies et al. (2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02123-5) to a misregistration of the JIRAM images. Here we reply to Davies (2024) showing that discrepancies in the results are due to the different methodologies, assumptions, and goals considered in the two works.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL112921","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to Comment by A. G. Davies on “Io Hot Spot Distribution Detected by Juno/JIRAM”\",\"authors\":\"F. Zambon, A. Mura, F. Tosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GL112921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Zambon et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl100597) presented a catalog of Io hot spots based on JIRAM M-band images acquired in Juno orbits 10 to 33. They identified 242 hot spots, including 23 not previously reported in other catalogs, observing a higher hot spot number density in the northern polar region. Davies (2024) disputes location and counting of part of these hot spots, attributing the differences between the Zambon et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl100597) results and those obtained by Davies et al. (2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02123-5) to a misregistration of the JIRAM images. Here we reply to Davies (2024) showing that discrepancies in the results are due to the different methodologies, assumptions, and goals considered in the two works.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL112921\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL112921\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL112921","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reply to Comment by A. G. Davies on “Io Hot Spot Distribution Detected by Juno/JIRAM”
Zambon et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl100597) presented a catalog of Io hot spots based on JIRAM M-band images acquired in Juno orbits 10 to 33. They identified 242 hot spots, including 23 not previously reported in other catalogs, observing a higher hot spot number density in the northern polar region. Davies (2024) disputes location and counting of part of these hot spots, attributing the differences between the Zambon et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl100597) results and those obtained by Davies et al. (2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02123-5) to a misregistration of the JIRAM images. Here we reply to Davies (2024) showing that discrepancies in the results are due to the different methodologies, assumptions, and goals considered in the two works.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.