Gillian V. Blayney, Veronica Giorgione, Amar Bhide, Basky Thilaganathan
{"title":"大、小或平均双胞胎冠臀长度对双胞胎怀孕的影响:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Gillian V. Blayney, Veronica Giorgione, Amar Bhide, Basky Thilaganathan","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the impact of twin dating by ultrasound-measured crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger (CRL-L), smaller (CRL-S) or mean twin measurement (CRL-M) on the rates of preterm birth (PTB) and detection of small for gestational age (SGA) births.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>A tertiary fetal medicine centre (London, UK).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population or Sample</h3>\n \n <p>All twin pregnancies between 1998 and 2023 who underwent first trimester CRL ultrasound assessment and fetal growth assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data collection included CRL measurement, estimated fetal weight (EFW), pregnancy outcome and birthweight (BW) for each twin. Pregnancies were retrospectively re-dated by CRL-S, CRL-L and CRL-M.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>SGA < 10th centile and extreme PTB rates (< 28 weeks).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the 1129 twin pregnancies, median CRL-S was 61 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.0–66.0) and CRL-L was 63 mm (IQR: 58.4–68.9) with a mean discordance of 4.0%. Prenatal SGA diagnosis occurred in 19.8% and 23.1% of smaller twins when dated by CRL-S and CRL-L, respectively. When pregnancies were dated by CRL-M versus CRL-S or CRL-L, there was no difference in prenatal SGA diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.275 and <i>p</i> = 0.419); SGA at birth (<i>p</i> = 0.132 and <i>p</i> = 0.325); or extreme PTB (<i>p</i> = > 0.999 and <i>p</i> = 0.765 respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Dating by the smaller, larger or mean twin CRL does not significantly alter rates of extreme preterm birth, SGA detection or SGA birth. Dating by the mean twin CRL reduces stigmatisation of the smaller twin and retains the utility of accurate gestational age assessment without impacting clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 5","pages":"648-655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Dating Twin Pregnancy by the Larger, Smaller or Mean Twin Crown-Rump Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Gillian V. Blayney, Veronica Giorgione, Amar Bhide, Basky Thilaganathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the impact of twin dating by ultrasound-measured crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger (CRL-L), smaller (CRL-S) or mean twin measurement (CRL-M) on the rates of preterm birth (PTB) and detection of small for gestational age (SGA) births.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>A tertiary fetal medicine centre (London, UK).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population or Sample</h3>\\n \\n <p>All twin pregnancies between 1998 and 2023 who underwent first trimester CRL ultrasound assessment and fetal growth assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data collection included CRL measurement, estimated fetal weight (EFW), pregnancy outcome and birthweight (BW) for each twin. Pregnancies were retrospectively re-dated by CRL-S, CRL-L and CRL-M.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>SGA < 10th centile and extreme PTB rates (< 28 weeks).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the 1129 twin pregnancies, median CRL-S was 61 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.0–66.0) and CRL-L was 63 mm (IQR: 58.4–68.9) with a mean discordance of 4.0%. Prenatal SGA diagnosis occurred in 19.8% and 23.1% of smaller twins when dated by CRL-S and CRL-L, respectively. When pregnancies were dated by CRL-M versus CRL-S or CRL-L, there was no difference in prenatal SGA diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.275 and <i>p</i> = 0.419); SGA at birth (<i>p</i> = 0.132 and <i>p</i> = 0.325); or extreme PTB (<i>p</i> = > 0.999 and <i>p</i> = 0.765 respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dating by the smaller, larger or mean twin CRL does not significantly alter rates of extreme preterm birth, SGA detection or SGA birth. Dating by the mean twin CRL reduces stigmatisation of the smaller twin and retains the utility of accurate gestational age assessment without impacting clinical outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 5\",\"pages\":\"648-655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18065\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Dating Twin Pregnancy by the Larger, Smaller or Mean Twin Crown-Rump Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Objective
To evaluate the impact of twin dating by ultrasound-measured crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger (CRL-L), smaller (CRL-S) or mean twin measurement (CRL-M) on the rates of preterm birth (PTB) and detection of small for gestational age (SGA) births.
Design
A retrospective cohort study.
Setting
A tertiary fetal medicine centre (London, UK).
Population or Sample
All twin pregnancies between 1998 and 2023 who underwent first trimester CRL ultrasound assessment and fetal growth assessment.
Methods
Data collection included CRL measurement, estimated fetal weight (EFW), pregnancy outcome and birthweight (BW) for each twin. Pregnancies were retrospectively re-dated by CRL-S, CRL-L and CRL-M.
In the 1129 twin pregnancies, median CRL-S was 61 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.0–66.0) and CRL-L was 63 mm (IQR: 58.4–68.9) with a mean discordance of 4.0%. Prenatal SGA diagnosis occurred in 19.8% and 23.1% of smaller twins when dated by CRL-S and CRL-L, respectively. When pregnancies were dated by CRL-M versus CRL-S or CRL-L, there was no difference in prenatal SGA diagnosis (p = 0.275 and p = 0.419); SGA at birth (p = 0.132 and p = 0.325); or extreme PTB (p = > 0.999 and p = 0.765 respectively).
Conclusions
Dating by the smaller, larger or mean twin CRL does not significantly alter rates of extreme preterm birth, SGA detection or SGA birth. Dating by the mean twin CRL reduces stigmatisation of the smaller twin and retains the utility of accurate gestational age assessment without impacting clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.