一种用于污水处理厂资源回收综合评估的新型水-食物-能源框架

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Anurag Bhambhani , Oriana Jovanovic , Hamse Kjerstadius , Daniele Di Trapani , Giorgio Mannina , Jan Peter van der Hoek , Zoran Kapelan
{"title":"一种用于污水处理厂资源回收综合评估的新型水-食物-能源框架","authors":"Anurag Bhambhani ,&nbsp;Oriana Jovanovic ,&nbsp;Hamse Kjerstadius ,&nbsp;Daniele Di Trapani ,&nbsp;Giorgio Mannina ,&nbsp;Jan Peter van der Hoek ,&nbsp;Zoran Kapelan","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a trend towards decentralized source separation (DSS) for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. An assessment framework is required to assess whether implementing a DSS treatment over a conventional centralized one is advantageous. This framework needs to account for the performance of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the effect that resource recovery has on closely-linked sectors such as food and energy production. A framework is lacking that covers the economic dimension, the circularity, the nature reciprocity of resource recovery and that can be applied to real-life cases. A novel WFE framework has been developed here to compare a conventional centralized and a DSS-based WWTP. This novel WFE framework contains assessment methods that are reproducible, and applicable to real-life cases. It also accounts for the local climatic conditions that determine irrigation water requirements. The comparison results revealed that the need to construct new DSS infrastructure leads to a lower economic efficiency of water treatment. Further, chemical-intensive treatment reduces the DSS's material resource circularity and efficiency. Using heat pumps increases the energy use of the DSS WWTP, causing a reduction in water treatment energy efficiency. However, the advantages of DSS show up in the freshwater and nutrient efficiency of food production as well as in the energy self-sufficiency of the WWTP. The novel WFE framework contains indicators specific to water treatment and the food production sectors to improve inter-sectoral communication. Also, including the nature reciprocity assessment can help demonstrate the issue with treated wastewater discharge, especially in arid regions with low stream flows. It can potentially help improve the acceptance of treated wastewater-based reuse. To conclude, the novel framework helps to assess real-life case studies in a more integrated and holistic way. It can help make decisions related to decentralization and source separation by simultaneously considering the water treatment, energy production, and food production sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"489 ","pages":"Article 144716"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel water-food-energy framework for a comprehensive assessment of resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants\",\"authors\":\"Anurag Bhambhani ,&nbsp;Oriana Jovanovic ,&nbsp;Hamse Kjerstadius ,&nbsp;Daniele Di Trapani ,&nbsp;Giorgio Mannina ,&nbsp;Jan Peter van der Hoek ,&nbsp;Zoran Kapelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is a trend towards decentralized source separation (DSS) for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. An assessment framework is required to assess whether implementing a DSS treatment over a conventional centralized one is advantageous. This framework needs to account for the performance of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the effect that resource recovery has on closely-linked sectors such as food and energy production. A framework is lacking that covers the economic dimension, the circularity, the nature reciprocity of resource recovery and that can be applied to real-life cases. A novel WFE framework has been developed here to compare a conventional centralized and a DSS-based WWTP. This novel WFE framework contains assessment methods that are reproducible, and applicable to real-life cases. It also accounts for the local climatic conditions that determine irrigation water requirements. The comparison results revealed that the need to construct new DSS infrastructure leads to a lower economic efficiency of water treatment. Further, chemical-intensive treatment reduces the DSS's material resource circularity and efficiency. Using heat pumps increases the energy use of the DSS WWTP, causing a reduction in water treatment energy efficiency. However, the advantages of DSS show up in the freshwater and nutrient efficiency of food production as well as in the energy self-sufficiency of the WWTP. The novel WFE framework contains indicators specific to water treatment and the food production sectors to improve inter-sectoral communication. Also, including the nature reciprocity assessment can help demonstrate the issue with treated wastewater discharge, especially in arid regions with low stream flows. It can potentially help improve the acceptance of treated wastewater-based reuse. To conclude, the novel framework helps to assess real-life case studies in a more integrated and holistic way. It can help make decisions related to decentralization and source separation by simultaneously considering the water treatment, energy production, and food production sectors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"489 \",\"pages\":\"Article 144716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625000666\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625000666","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分散源分离(DSS)是污水处理和资源回收的发展趋势。需要一个评估框架来评估实施DSS治疗是否优于传统的集中式治疗。这一框架需要考虑到废水处理厂(WWTP)的绩效以及资源回收对粮食和能源生产等密切相关部门的影响。目前缺乏一个涵盖经济层面、循环性、资源回收互惠性质并可适用于实际案例的框架。这里开发了一个新的WFE框架来比较传统的集中式和基于dss的WWTP。这种新颖的WFE框架包含可重复的评估方法,并适用于现实生活中的案例。它还考虑了决定灌溉用水需求的当地气候条件。对比结果表明,由于需要新建DSS基础设施,导致水处理的经济效益较低。此外,化学密集处理降低了DSS的材料资源循环和效率。使用热泵增加了DSS污水处理厂的能源使用,导致水处理能源效率的降低。然而,DSS的优势体现在粮食生产的淡水和养分效率以及污水处理厂的能源自给自足方面。新的水处理和粮食生产框架包含针对水处理和粮食生产部门的具体指标,以改善部门间的沟通。此外,包括自然互易性评估可以帮助证明处理过的废水排放的问题,特别是在低流量的干旱地区。它可能有助于提高对处理过的废水基再利用的接受程度。总之,新的框架有助于以一种更综合、更全面的方式评估现实生活中的案例研究。通过同时考虑水处理、能源生产和粮食生产部门,它可以帮助做出与权力下放和来源分离有关的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel water-food-energy framework for a comprehensive assessment of resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants
There is a trend towards decentralized source separation (DSS) for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. An assessment framework is required to assess whether implementing a DSS treatment over a conventional centralized one is advantageous. This framework needs to account for the performance of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the effect that resource recovery has on closely-linked sectors such as food and energy production. A framework is lacking that covers the economic dimension, the circularity, the nature reciprocity of resource recovery and that can be applied to real-life cases. A novel WFE framework has been developed here to compare a conventional centralized and a DSS-based WWTP. This novel WFE framework contains assessment methods that are reproducible, and applicable to real-life cases. It also accounts for the local climatic conditions that determine irrigation water requirements. The comparison results revealed that the need to construct new DSS infrastructure leads to a lower economic efficiency of water treatment. Further, chemical-intensive treatment reduces the DSS's material resource circularity and efficiency. Using heat pumps increases the energy use of the DSS WWTP, causing a reduction in water treatment energy efficiency. However, the advantages of DSS show up in the freshwater and nutrient efficiency of food production as well as in the energy self-sufficiency of the WWTP. The novel WFE framework contains indicators specific to water treatment and the food production sectors to improve inter-sectoral communication. Also, including the nature reciprocity assessment can help demonstrate the issue with treated wastewater discharge, especially in arid regions with low stream flows. It can potentially help improve the acceptance of treated wastewater-based reuse. To conclude, the novel framework helps to assess real-life case studies in a more integrated and holistic way. It can help make decisions related to decentralization and source separation by simultaneously considering the water treatment, energy production, and food production sectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信