Joseph C. Brinkman, Eugenia A. Lin, M. Lane Moore, Nikhil N. Verma, John M. Tokish
{"title":"关节盂骨移植固定技术的生物力学效果:系统综述","authors":"Joseph C. Brinkman, Eugenia A. Lin, M. Lane Moore, Nikhil N. Verma, John M. Tokish","doi":"10.1177/03635465241278328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The Latarjet and other bony augmentation procedures are commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability in the setting of significant glenoid bone loss. Although several fixation strategies have been reported, the biomechanical strength of these techniques remains poorly understood.Purpose:To perform a systematic review of the biomechanical strength of glenoid bony augmentation procedures for anterior shoulder instability.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify biomechanical studies evaluating various fixation strategies for coracoid and other bone transfer procedures for anterior shoulder instability. Biomechanical results included load to failure with both compression and traction forces, stiffness, and cyclic displacement. The quality of included articles was assessed based on the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale.Results:A total of 21 biomechanical studies comprising 486 specimens were included. The number of screws used and the addition of washers were found to significantly increase rigidity and load to failure. The comparison of fixation techniques demonstrated mixed results in load to failure between screw and alternative constructs including suture buttons and suture anchors. However, studies that tested graft displacement consistently found more graft displacement in buttons compared with screws. The median and mean of the QUACS scale were both 12, with a range of 10-13.Conclusion:Biomechanical studies consistently demonstrated that when glenoid bone grafts were fixed with screws, the number of screws and use of washers significantly increased construct rigidity and load to failure. Different metal screw materials and sizes did not consistently demonstrate a significant difference in biomechanical strength. There are mixed results when comparing suture buttons to screw fixation. The evaluated studies revealed that all double metal screw constructs and the majority of suture button and anchor constructs were able to withstand the glenohumeral load reflective of activities of daily living using a 150-N threshold.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Outcomes of Glenoid Bone Graft Fixation Techniques: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Joseph C. Brinkman, Eugenia A. Lin, M. Lane Moore, Nikhil N. Verma, John M. Tokish\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241278328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:The Latarjet and other bony augmentation procedures are commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability in the setting of significant glenoid bone loss. Although several fixation strategies have been reported, the biomechanical strength of these techniques remains poorly understood.Purpose:To perform a systematic review of the biomechanical strength of glenoid bony augmentation procedures for anterior shoulder instability.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify biomechanical studies evaluating various fixation strategies for coracoid and other bone transfer procedures for anterior shoulder instability. Biomechanical results included load to failure with both compression and traction forces, stiffness, and cyclic displacement. The quality of included articles was assessed based on the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale.Results:A total of 21 biomechanical studies comprising 486 specimens were included. The number of screws used and the addition of washers were found to significantly increase rigidity and load to failure. The comparison of fixation techniques demonstrated mixed results in load to failure between screw and alternative constructs including suture buttons and suture anchors. However, studies that tested graft displacement consistently found more graft displacement in buttons compared with screws. The median and mean of the QUACS scale were both 12, with a range of 10-13.Conclusion:Biomechanical studies consistently demonstrated that when glenoid bone grafts were fixed with screws, the number of screws and use of washers significantly increased construct rigidity and load to failure. Different metal screw materials and sizes did not consistently demonstrate a significant difference in biomechanical strength. There are mixed results when comparing suture buttons to screw fixation. The evaluated studies revealed that all double metal screw constructs and the majority of suture button and anchor constructs were able to withstand the glenohumeral load reflective of activities of daily living using a 150-N threshold.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241278328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241278328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Latarjet和其他骨增强手术通常用于治疗肩关节前路失稳的严重盂骨丢失。虽然已经报道了几种固定策略,但这些技术的生物力学强度仍然知之甚少。目的:对肩关节前路不稳定的生物力学强度进行系统回顾。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:对Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库进行系统检索,以确定评估喙骨固定策略和其他骨转移手术治疗肩前路不稳的生物力学研究。生物力学结果包括压缩力和牵引力、刚度和循环位移的载荷到失效。纳入文章的质量根据尸体研究质量评估(QUACS)量表进行评估。结果:共纳入21项生物力学研究,486例标本。发现使用的螺钉数量和垫圈的增加显著增加了刚度和失效载荷。固定技术的比较表明,螺钉和其他结构(包括缝合扣和缝合锚)在载荷到失效方面的结果不一。然而,测试移植物位移的研究一致发现,与螺钉相比,钮扣的移植物位移更多。QUACS量表的中位数和平均值均为12,范围为10-13。结论:生物力学研究一致表明,当用螺钉固定肩关节骨移植物时,螺钉数量和垫圈的使用显著增加了结构刚度和载荷。不同的金属螺钉材料和尺寸在生物力学强度上并没有一致的显著差异。将缝合扣与螺钉固定进行比较,结果好坏参半。评估研究显示,所有双金属螺钉结构和大多数缝合扣和锚结构都能够承受150-N阈值反映日常生活活动的盂肱负荷。
Biomechanical Outcomes of Glenoid Bone Graft Fixation Techniques: A Systematic Review
Background:The Latarjet and other bony augmentation procedures are commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability in the setting of significant glenoid bone loss. Although several fixation strategies have been reported, the biomechanical strength of these techniques remains poorly understood.Purpose:To perform a systematic review of the biomechanical strength of glenoid bony augmentation procedures for anterior shoulder instability.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify biomechanical studies evaluating various fixation strategies for coracoid and other bone transfer procedures for anterior shoulder instability. Biomechanical results included load to failure with both compression and traction forces, stiffness, and cyclic displacement. The quality of included articles was assessed based on the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale.Results:A total of 21 biomechanical studies comprising 486 specimens were included. The number of screws used and the addition of washers were found to significantly increase rigidity and load to failure. The comparison of fixation techniques demonstrated mixed results in load to failure between screw and alternative constructs including suture buttons and suture anchors. However, studies that tested graft displacement consistently found more graft displacement in buttons compared with screws. The median and mean of the QUACS scale were both 12, with a range of 10-13.Conclusion:Biomechanical studies consistently demonstrated that when glenoid bone grafts were fixed with screws, the number of screws and use of washers significantly increased construct rigidity and load to failure. Different metal screw materials and sizes did not consistently demonstrate a significant difference in biomechanical strength. There are mixed results when comparing suture buttons to screw fixation. The evaluated studies revealed that all double metal screw constructs and the majority of suture button and anchor constructs were able to withstand the glenohumeral load reflective of activities of daily living using a 150-N threshold.