运动和运动医学研究的女性参与者在哪里?十年后

Benjamin M. Ose, Jake Eisenhauer, Isaiah Roepe, Ashley A. Herda, Bryan G. Vopat, Lisa M. Vopat
{"title":"运动和运动医学研究的女性参与者在哪里?十年后","authors":"Benjamin M. Ose, Jake Eisenhauer, Isaiah Roepe, Ashley A. Herda, Bryan G. Vopat, Lisa M. Vopat","doi":"10.1177/03635465241278350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:In 2014, Costello and colleagues published a sentinel paper spotlighting the large disparity of female versus male representation within sports science and sports medicine (SSSM) research.Purpose:To (1) revisit the method published by Costello et al a decade later to evaluate female representation and (2) ascertain whether study designs account for menstrual status.Study Design:Systematic Review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:All original and epidemiologic research of live human participants from the journals Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, British Journal of Sports Medicine, and the American Journal of Sports Medicine were included from January 2021 to August 2023. Number of male and female participants for each study was analyzed. A menstrual-status tiering system published by Smith et al was used to classify the consideration of female participants’ menstrual status in study design.Results:A total of 1441 studies and 40,152,860 participants were included in this analysis. This included 17,648,509 (43.95%) female participants. The mean proportion of female participants per study was 40.22%, and 103 (7.15%) studies included only female participants compared with 268 (18.6%) male-only studies. A total of 66 (5.6%) studies included menstrual-status considerations in their study design with 7.7 (0.7%) and 5.5 (0.5%) receiving a silver or gold classification, respectively, for design considerations.Conclusion:Our investigation into the representation of female athletes in SSSM research found an increase in female participation from 39% to 43.95% of total participants over the past decade. While the overall number of female participants rose in the years 2021 to 2023, there remains a significant disparity in female representation in SSSM research compared with male participants. Additionally, we found that the inclusion of menstrual status in study designs has been limited, with few studies considering this crucial variable.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Are All the Female Participants in Sports and Exercise Medicine Research? A Decade Later\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin M. Ose, Jake Eisenhauer, Isaiah Roepe, Ashley A. Herda, Bryan G. Vopat, Lisa M. Vopat\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241278350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:In 2014, Costello and colleagues published a sentinel paper spotlighting the large disparity of female versus male representation within sports science and sports medicine (SSSM) research.Purpose:To (1) revisit the method published by Costello et al a decade later to evaluate female representation and (2) ascertain whether study designs account for menstrual status.Study Design:Systematic Review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:All original and epidemiologic research of live human participants from the journals Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, British Journal of Sports Medicine, and the American Journal of Sports Medicine were included from January 2021 to August 2023. Number of male and female participants for each study was analyzed. A menstrual-status tiering system published by Smith et al was used to classify the consideration of female participants’ menstrual status in study design.Results:A total of 1441 studies and 40,152,860 participants were included in this analysis. This included 17,648,509 (43.95%) female participants. The mean proportion of female participants per study was 40.22%, and 103 (7.15%) studies included only female participants compared with 268 (18.6%) male-only studies. A total of 66 (5.6%) studies included menstrual-status considerations in their study design with 7.7 (0.7%) and 5.5 (0.5%) receiving a silver or gold classification, respectively, for design considerations.Conclusion:Our investigation into the representation of female athletes in SSSM research found an increase in female participation from 39% to 43.95% of total participants over the past decade. While the overall number of female participants rose in the years 2021 to 2023, there remains a significant disparity in female representation in SSSM research compared with male participants. Additionally, we found that the inclusion of menstrual status in study designs has been limited, with few studies considering this crucial variable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241278350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241278350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2014年,Costello及其同事发表了一篇前哨文章,强调了在运动科学和运动医学(SSSM)研究中女性和男性代表的巨大差异。目的:(1)重新审视Costello等人十年后发表的评估女性代表性的方法;(2)确定研究设计是否考虑了月经状况。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:纳入2021年1月至2023年8月期间《运动与运动医学与科学》、《英国运动医学杂志》和《美国运动医学杂志》上发表的所有活体人类参与者的原创和流行病学研究。对每项研究的男性和女性参与者的数量进行了分析。采用Smith等人发表的月经状况分级系统对研究设计中女性受试者月经状况的考虑进行分类。结果:共有1441项研究和40152860名参与者被纳入本分析。其中包括17,648,509(43.95%)名女性参与者。每项研究中女性参与者的平均比例为40.22%,103项(7.15%)研究仅包括女性参与者,而268项(18.6%)研究仅包括男性参与者。共有66项(5.6%)研究在其研究设计中考虑了月经状况,其中7.7项(0.7%)和5.5项(0.5%)的研究在设计考虑方面分别获得了银级或金级。结论:我们对SSSM研究中女性运动员代表性的调查发现,在过去十年中,女性参与总参与者的比例从39%增加到43.95%。虽然女性参与者的总数在2021年至2023年期间有所增加,但与男性参与者相比,女性在SSSM研究中的代表性仍然存在显着差异。此外,我们发现在研究设计中纳入月经状况的研究是有限的,很少有研究考虑到这一关键变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where Are All the Female Participants in Sports and Exercise Medicine Research? A Decade Later
Background:In 2014, Costello and colleagues published a sentinel paper spotlighting the large disparity of female versus male representation within sports science and sports medicine (SSSM) research.Purpose:To (1) revisit the method published by Costello et al a decade later to evaluate female representation and (2) ascertain whether study designs account for menstrual status.Study Design:Systematic Review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:All original and epidemiologic research of live human participants from the journals Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, British Journal of Sports Medicine, and the American Journal of Sports Medicine were included from January 2021 to August 2023. Number of male and female participants for each study was analyzed. A menstrual-status tiering system published by Smith et al was used to classify the consideration of female participants’ menstrual status in study design.Results:A total of 1441 studies and 40,152,860 participants were included in this analysis. This included 17,648,509 (43.95%) female participants. The mean proportion of female participants per study was 40.22%, and 103 (7.15%) studies included only female participants compared with 268 (18.6%) male-only studies. A total of 66 (5.6%) studies included menstrual-status considerations in their study design with 7.7 (0.7%) and 5.5 (0.5%) receiving a silver or gold classification, respectively, for design considerations.Conclusion:Our investigation into the representation of female athletes in SSSM research found an increase in female participation from 39% to 43.95% of total participants over the past decade. While the overall number of female participants rose in the years 2021 to 2023, there remains a significant disparity in female representation in SSSM research compared with male participants. Additionally, we found that the inclusion of menstrual status in study designs has been limited, with few studies considering this crucial variable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信