小麦和拟南芥根系在琼脂、水培和土壤中对聚苯乙烯纳米球的吸收

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kaushik Adhikari, Karen A. Sanguinet, Carolyn I. Pearce and Markus Flury
{"title":"小麦和拟南芥根系在琼脂、水培和土壤中对聚苯乙烯纳米球的吸收","authors":"Kaushik Adhikari, Karen A. Sanguinet, Carolyn I. Pearce and Markus Flury","doi":"10.1039/D4EN01182A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Plant uptake of micro- and nanoplastics can lead to contamination of food with plastic particles and subsequent human consumption of plastics. There is evidence that plant roots can take up micro and nanoplastics; however, most of this evidence stems from experiments conducted with plants grown in hydroponics or agar systems where uptake of nanoparticles by roots is more favorable than when plants were grown in soil. Here, we discern the root uptake and accumulation of polystyrene nanospheres in plants grown in different growth media: agar, hydroponics, and soil. In addition, we tested the impacts of nanospheres on plant biomass and plant stress. Wheat and <em>Arabidopsis thaliana</em> were grown in agar, hydroponics, and soil media and exposed to polystyrene nanospheres. Three different nanospheres were used (40 nm and 200 nm carboxylate-modified and 200 nm amino-modified polystyrene) and uniformly mixed into the growth media. Plants were grown for 7 to 10 days and the roots were then examined for the presence of nanospheres by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Plant stress was evaluated by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS). We observed the 40 nm nanospheres inside the plant roots, but the 200 nm nanospheres only adhered to the root cap cells showing no uptake into the roots. Furthermore, confocal images indicated that root uptake of nanospheres was favored in hydroponic solutions as compared to agar and soil media. Plant biomass was generally not affected by the nanospheres, except for hydroponically grown <em>Arabidopsis thaliana</em>, where biomass was significantly reduced. Small sized (40 nm) and positively charged (200 nm amino-modified) nanospheres showed higher ROS accumulation in plants than negatively charged 200 nm carboxylate-modified nanospheres. This study provides evidence that polystyrene nanospheres can be taken up into the interior of plant roots and cause plant stress, but these impacts are less pronounced in media where the plastic particles are less mobile, like in agar and soil media as compared to hydroponic systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Nano","volume":" 2","pages":" 1685-1696"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of polystyrene nanospheres by wheat and Arabidopsis roots in agar, hydroponics, and soil†\",\"authors\":\"Kaushik Adhikari, Karen A. Sanguinet, Carolyn I. Pearce and Markus Flury\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EN01182A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Plant uptake of micro- and nanoplastics can lead to contamination of food with plastic particles and subsequent human consumption of plastics. There is evidence that plant roots can take up micro and nanoplastics; however, most of this evidence stems from experiments conducted with plants grown in hydroponics or agar systems where uptake of nanoparticles by roots is more favorable than when plants were grown in soil. Here, we discern the root uptake and accumulation of polystyrene nanospheres in plants grown in different growth media: agar, hydroponics, and soil. In addition, we tested the impacts of nanospheres on plant biomass and plant stress. Wheat and <em>Arabidopsis thaliana</em> were grown in agar, hydroponics, and soil media and exposed to polystyrene nanospheres. Three different nanospheres were used (40 nm and 200 nm carboxylate-modified and 200 nm amino-modified polystyrene) and uniformly mixed into the growth media. Plants were grown for 7 to 10 days and the roots were then examined for the presence of nanospheres by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Plant stress was evaluated by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS). We observed the 40 nm nanospheres inside the plant roots, but the 200 nm nanospheres only adhered to the root cap cells showing no uptake into the roots. Furthermore, confocal images indicated that root uptake of nanospheres was favored in hydroponic solutions as compared to agar and soil media. Plant biomass was generally not affected by the nanospheres, except for hydroponically grown <em>Arabidopsis thaliana</em>, where biomass was significantly reduced. Small sized (40 nm) and positively charged (200 nm amino-modified) nanospheres showed higher ROS accumulation in plants than negatively charged 200 nm carboxylate-modified nanospheres. This study provides evidence that polystyrene nanospheres can be taken up into the interior of plant roots and cause plant stress, but these impacts are less pronounced in media where the plastic particles are less mobile, like in agar and soil media as compared to hydroponic systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Nano\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\" 1685-1696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Nano\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/en/d4en01182a\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Nano","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/en/d4en01182a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物对微塑料和纳米塑料的吸收可能导致食品被塑料颗粒污染,进而导致人类食用塑料。有证据表明,植物根系可以吸收微塑料和纳米塑料;然而,这些证据大多来自对水培或琼脂系统中生长的植物进行的实验,在这些系统中,根对纳米颗粒的吸收比在土壤中生长的植物更有利。在这里,我们观察了生长在不同生长介质(琼脂、水培和土壤)中的植物对聚苯乙烯纳米球的根系吸收和积累。此外,我们还测试了纳米微球对植物生物量和植物胁迫的影响。小麦和拟南芥分别在琼脂、水培和土壤培养基中生长,并暴露于聚苯乙烯纳米球中。使用三种不同的纳米球(40 nm和200 nm羧酸改性和200 nm氨基改性聚苯乙烯)均匀混合到生长介质中。植物生长7至10天,然后通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜和扫描电子显微镜检查根是否存在纳米球。通过测定活性氧(ROS)来评估植物的胁迫。我们观察到40 nm的纳米球在植物根内,而200 nm的纳米球只粘附在根冠细胞上,没有被根吸收。此外,共聚焦图像表明,与琼脂和土壤培养基相比,水培溶液中纳米球的根吸收更有利。除水培栽培的拟南芥生物量显著降低外,其他植物生物量基本不受纳米微球的影响。小尺寸(40 nm)和带正电荷(200 nm)的氨基修饰纳米球比带负电荷(200 nm)的羧酸修饰纳米球在植物体内的ROS积累更高。这项研究提供了证据,证明聚苯乙烯纳米球可以进入植物根系内部并引起植物胁迫,但与水培系统相比,这些影响在塑料颗粒流动性较差的介质中不那么明显,比如琼脂和土壤介质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uptake of polystyrene nanospheres by wheat and Arabidopsis roots in agar, hydroponics, and soil†

Uptake of polystyrene nanospheres by wheat and Arabidopsis roots in agar, hydroponics, and soil†

Plant uptake of micro- and nanoplastics can lead to contamination of food with plastic particles and subsequent human consumption of plastics. There is evidence that plant roots can take up micro and nanoplastics; however, most of this evidence stems from experiments conducted with plants grown in hydroponics or agar systems where uptake of nanoparticles by roots is more favorable than when plants were grown in soil. Here, we discern the root uptake and accumulation of polystyrene nanospheres in plants grown in different growth media: agar, hydroponics, and soil. In addition, we tested the impacts of nanospheres on plant biomass and plant stress. Wheat and Arabidopsis thaliana were grown in agar, hydroponics, and soil media and exposed to polystyrene nanospheres. Three different nanospheres were used (40 nm and 200 nm carboxylate-modified and 200 nm amino-modified polystyrene) and uniformly mixed into the growth media. Plants were grown for 7 to 10 days and the roots were then examined for the presence of nanospheres by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Plant stress was evaluated by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS). We observed the 40 nm nanospheres inside the plant roots, but the 200 nm nanospheres only adhered to the root cap cells showing no uptake into the roots. Furthermore, confocal images indicated that root uptake of nanospheres was favored in hydroponic solutions as compared to agar and soil media. Plant biomass was generally not affected by the nanospheres, except for hydroponically grown Arabidopsis thaliana, where biomass was significantly reduced. Small sized (40 nm) and positively charged (200 nm amino-modified) nanospheres showed higher ROS accumulation in plants than negatively charged 200 nm carboxylate-modified nanospheres. This study provides evidence that polystyrene nanospheres can be taken up into the interior of plant roots and cause plant stress, but these impacts are less pronounced in media where the plastic particles are less mobile, like in agar and soil media as compared to hydroponic systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Nano
Environmental Science: Nano CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Nano serves as a comprehensive and high-impact peer-reviewed source of information on the design and demonstration of engineered nanomaterials for environment-based applications. It also covers the interactions between engineered, natural, and incidental nanomaterials with biological and environmental systems. This scope includes, but is not limited to, the following topic areas: Novel nanomaterial-based applications for water, air, soil, food, and energy sustainability Nanomaterial interactions with biological systems and nanotoxicology Environmental fate, reactivity, and transformations of nanoscale materials Nanoscale processes in the environment Sustainable nanotechnology including rational nanomaterial design, life cycle assessment, risk/benefit analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信