{"title":"日本老年ICU患者生命支持干预的使用和结果:一项全国性的登记研究","authors":"Junji Shiotsuka, Tomoyuki Masuyama, Shigehiko Uchino, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Reina Suzuki, Shohei Ono, Koichi Yoshinaga, Yusuke Iizuka, Masamitsu Sanui","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07759-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of life-supporting interventions and the short-term outcomes of older patients in ICUs in Japan.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>All adult patients admitted to ICUs participating in the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database (JIPAD) from April 1, 2015, to March 31, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Information, including life-supporting interventions, was retrieved from the database. Patients were divided into six age groups. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of receiving a composite of the following interventions: mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, and veno-venous or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Data of a total of 233,093 patients were analyzed. The median age was 71 years, with 18.2% of the patients in their 80s, 5303 patients in their 90s (2.3%), and 67 patients in their 100s. Many life-supporting interventions were provided to older patients. The proportion of patients older than 90 years who received the composite interventions decreased from 40.4% in 18–59 to 27.6% in 90–99. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use increased with age, resulting in a consistent proportion of patients receiving either NIV or mechanical ventilation until their 90s. ICU mortality for patients aged 80 years or older was 5.6%, and hospital mortality for this age group was 12.9%. Approximately half of the patients in their 80s and 60% of those older than 90 years did not return home.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Although life-supporting interventions tended to decrease with age, a considerable number of patients of advanced age still received these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization and outcomes of life-supporting interventions in older ICU patients in Japan: a nationwide registry study\",\"authors\":\"Junji Shiotsuka, Tomoyuki Masuyama, Shigehiko Uchino, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Reina Suzuki, Shohei Ono, Koichi Yoshinaga, Yusuke Iizuka, Masamitsu Sanui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00134-024-07759-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of life-supporting interventions and the short-term outcomes of older patients in ICUs in Japan.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>All adult patients admitted to ICUs participating in the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database (JIPAD) from April 1, 2015, to March 31, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Information, including life-supporting interventions, was retrieved from the database. Patients were divided into six age groups. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of receiving a composite of the following interventions: mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, and veno-venous or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Data of a total of 233,093 patients were analyzed. The median age was 71 years, with 18.2% of the patients in their 80s, 5303 patients in their 90s (2.3%), and 67 patients in their 100s. Many life-supporting interventions were provided to older patients. The proportion of patients older than 90 years who received the composite interventions decreased from 40.4% in 18–59 to 27.6% in 90–99. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use increased with age, resulting in a consistent proportion of patients receiving either NIV or mechanical ventilation until their 90s. ICU mortality for patients aged 80 years or older was 5.6%, and hospital mortality for this age group was 12.9%. Approximately half of the patients in their 80s and 60% of those older than 90 years did not return home.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Although life-supporting interventions tended to decrease with age, a considerable number of patients of advanced age still received these interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":27.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07759-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07759-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization and outcomes of life-supporting interventions in older ICU patients in Japan: a nationwide registry study
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of life-supporting interventions and the short-term outcomes of older patients in ICUs in Japan.
Methods
All adult patients admitted to ICUs participating in the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database (JIPAD) from April 1, 2015, to March 31, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Information, including life-supporting interventions, was retrieved from the database. Patients were divided into six age groups. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of receiving a composite of the following interventions: mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, and veno-venous or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Results
Data of a total of 233,093 patients were analyzed. The median age was 71 years, with 18.2% of the patients in their 80s, 5303 patients in their 90s (2.3%), and 67 patients in their 100s. Many life-supporting interventions were provided to older patients. The proportion of patients older than 90 years who received the composite interventions decreased from 40.4% in 18–59 to 27.6% in 90–99. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use increased with age, resulting in a consistent proportion of patients receiving either NIV or mechanical ventilation until their 90s. ICU mortality for patients aged 80 years or older was 5.6%, and hospital mortality for this age group was 12.9%. Approximately half of the patients in their 80s and 60% of those older than 90 years did not return home.
Conclusion
Although life-supporting interventions tended to decrease with age, a considerable number of patients of advanced age still received these interventions.
期刊介绍:
Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.