绿色分析化学指标用于评价分析过程的绿色度。

Journal of pharmaceutical analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101013
Lei Yin, Luyao Yu, Yingxia Guo, Chuya Wang, Yuncheng Ge, Xinyue Zheng, Ning Zhang, Jiansong You, Yong Zhang, Meiyun Shi
{"title":"绿色分析化学指标用于评价分析过程的绿色度。","authors":"Lei Yin, Luyao Yu, Yingxia Guo, Chuya Wang, Yuncheng Ge, Xinyue Zheng, Ning Zhang, Jiansong You, Yong Zhang, Meiyun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green analytical chemistry (GAC) focuses on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human safety, human health, and environment. In addition to the 12 principles of GAC, proper GAC tools should be developed and employed to assess the greenness of different analytical assays. The 15 widely used GAC metrics, i.e., national environmental methods index (NEMI), advanced NEMI, assessment of green profile (AGP), chloroform-oriented toxicity estimation scale (ChlorTox Scale), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Certificate Modified Eco-Scale, analytical method greenness score (AMGS), green analytical procedure index (GAPI), ComplexGAPI, red-green-blue (RGB) additive color model, RGB 12 algorithm, analytical greenness calculator (AGREE), AGREE preparation (AGREEprep), HEXAGON, and blue applicability grade index (BAGI), are selected as the typical tools. This article comprehensively presents and elucidates the principles, characteristics, merits, and demerits of 15 widely used GAC tools. This review is helpful for researchers to use the current GAC metrics to assess the environmental sustainability of analytical assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":94338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical analysis","volume":"14 11","pages":"101013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the greenness of analytical procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Yin, Luyao Yu, Yingxia Guo, Chuya Wang, Yuncheng Ge, Xinyue Zheng, Ning Zhang, Jiansong You, Yong Zhang, Meiyun Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Green analytical chemistry (GAC) focuses on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human safety, human health, and environment. In addition to the 12 principles of GAC, proper GAC tools should be developed and employed to assess the greenness of different analytical assays. The 15 widely used GAC metrics, i.e., national environmental methods index (NEMI), advanced NEMI, assessment of green profile (AGP), chloroform-oriented toxicity estimation scale (ChlorTox Scale), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Certificate Modified Eco-Scale, analytical method greenness score (AMGS), green analytical procedure index (GAPI), ComplexGAPI, red-green-blue (RGB) additive color model, RGB 12 algorithm, analytical greenness calculator (AGREE), AGREE preparation (AGREEprep), HEXAGON, and blue applicability grade index (BAGI), are selected as the typical tools. This article comprehensively presents and elucidates the principles, characteristics, merits, and demerits of 15 widely used GAC tools. This review is helpful for researchers to use the current GAC metrics to assess the environmental sustainability of analytical assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical analysis\",\"volume\":\"14 11\",\"pages\":\"101013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色分析化学(GAC)侧重于减轻分析活动对人类安全、人类健康和环境的不利影响。除了GAC的12个原则外,还应该开发和使用合适的GAC工具来评估不同分析方法的绿色度。目前广泛使用的15个GAC指标,即国家环境方法指数(NEMI)、高级NEMI、绿色轮廓评估(AGP)、氯仿毒性评估量表(ChlorTox scale)、分析生态量表、绿色证书修正生态量表、分析方法绿色度评分(AMGS)、绿色分析程序指数(GAPI)、ComplexGAPI、红绿蓝(RGB)加色模型、RGB 12算法、分析绿色度计算器(AGREE)、AGREE制备(AGREEprep)、HEXAGON、和蓝色适用性等级指数(BAGI)作为典型工具。本文全面介绍和阐述了15种广泛使用的GAC工具的原理、特点、优缺点。本文综述有助于研究人员使用现有的GAC指标来评估分析方法的环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the greenness of analytical procedures.

Green analytical chemistry (GAC) focuses on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human safety, human health, and environment. In addition to the 12 principles of GAC, proper GAC tools should be developed and employed to assess the greenness of different analytical assays. The 15 widely used GAC metrics, i.e., national environmental methods index (NEMI), advanced NEMI, assessment of green profile (AGP), chloroform-oriented toxicity estimation scale (ChlorTox Scale), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Certificate Modified Eco-Scale, analytical method greenness score (AMGS), green analytical procedure index (GAPI), ComplexGAPI, red-green-blue (RGB) additive color model, RGB 12 algorithm, analytical greenness calculator (AGREE), AGREE preparation (AGREEprep), HEXAGON, and blue applicability grade index (BAGI), are selected as the typical tools. This article comprehensively presents and elucidates the principles, characteristics, merits, and demerits of 15 widely used GAC tools. This review is helpful for researchers to use the current GAC metrics to assess the environmental sustainability of analytical assays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信