一种新型牵引装置(TRACMOTION)在内镜下使用剪刀型刀剥离粘膜下的有效性:动物实验和临床经验。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70052
Yuko Miura, Yosuke Tsuji, Ryohei Miyata, Ayano Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Tsukihara, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
{"title":"一种新型牵引装置(TRACMOTION)在内镜下使用剪刀型刀剥离粘膜下的有效性:动物实验和临床经验。","authors":"Yuko Miura,&nbsp;Yosuke Tsuji,&nbsp;Ryohei Miyata,&nbsp;Ayano Fujisawa,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Tsukihara,&nbsp;Mitsuhiro Fujishiro","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A newly developed articulated through-the-scope traction device, TRACMOTION, has been used clinically for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, there are few reports on the characteristics of this device and the lesion types for which it is most effective. Therefore, we evaluated its optimal use, efficacy, and safety clinically in animals. Subsequently, we confirmed the safety and efficacy of ESD using this device in humans. Two live swine were used; one underwent conventional ESD (C-ESD) and the other traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD). To examine the traction effect at each resection site, three ESD ulcers (greater curvature/anterior wall/posterior wall) with a diameter of approximately 40 mm were created in each swine. Based on our preliminary experiments, scissor-type and needle-type knives were used in the T-ESD and C-ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was the resection speed, and the secondary endpoint was the degree of muscle layer damage. T-ESD was faster than C-ESD on the posterior wall, similar to the greater curvature, and T-ESD was slower than C-ESD on the anterior wall. There were no cases of intraoperative perforations. Obvious muscle layer damage was observed in post-C-ESD wounds on the anterior wall. The submucosal layer was retained in all post-T-ESD wounds. Although this study showed that ESD with TRACMOTION may be safe and effective, it is necessary to consider that it may be unsuitable for some lesions. This may be due to device characteristics and requires further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a novel traction device (TRACMOTION) for endoscopic submucosal dissection using a scissor-type knife: An animal pilot study and clinical experiences\",\"authors\":\"Yuko Miura,&nbsp;Yosuke Tsuji,&nbsp;Ryohei Miyata,&nbsp;Ayano Fujisawa,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Tsukihara,&nbsp;Mitsuhiro Fujishiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A newly developed articulated through-the-scope traction device, TRACMOTION, has been used clinically for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, there are few reports on the characteristics of this device and the lesion types for which it is most effective. Therefore, we evaluated its optimal use, efficacy, and safety clinically in animals. Subsequently, we confirmed the safety and efficacy of ESD using this device in humans. Two live swine were used; one underwent conventional ESD (C-ESD) and the other traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD). To examine the traction effect at each resection site, three ESD ulcers (greater curvature/anterior wall/posterior wall) with a diameter of approximately 40 mm were created in each swine. Based on our preliminary experiments, scissor-type and needle-type knives were used in the T-ESD and C-ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was the resection speed, and the secondary endpoint was the degree of muscle layer damage. T-ESD was faster than C-ESD on the posterior wall, similar to the greater curvature, and T-ESD was slower than C-ESD on the anterior wall. There were no cases of intraoperative perforations. Obvious muscle layer damage was observed in post-C-ESD wounds on the anterior wall. The submucosal layer was retained in all post-T-ESD wounds. Although this study showed that ESD with TRACMOTION may be safe and effective, it is necessary to consider that it may be unsuitable for some lesions. This may be due to device characteristics and requires further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一种新开发的关节式过镜牵引装置TRACMOTION已被临床用于内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)。然而,关于该装置的特点和它最有效的病变类型的报道很少。因此,我们评估了其在动物临床中的最佳使用、疗效和安全性。随后,我们证实了在人体中使用该装置的ESD的安全性和有效性。使用了两头活猪;一组接受常规ESD (C-ESD),另一组接受牵引辅助ESD (T-ESD)。为了检查每个切除部位的牵引效果,在每头猪中创建三个直径约为40毫米的ESD溃疡(大曲率/前壁/后壁)。根据我们的初步实验,T-ESD组使用剪刀式刀,C-ESD组使用针式刀。主要终点为切除速度,次要终点为肌肉层损伤程度。后壁T-ESD比C-ESD快,类似于大曲率,前壁T-ESD比C-ESD慢。术中无穿孔。c - esd损伤后前壁肌层损伤明显。所有t- esd后创面均保留粘膜下层。虽然本研究显示ESD与TRACMOTION可能是安全有效的,但需要考虑到它可能不适合某些病变。这可能是由于器械特性,需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of a novel traction device (TRACMOTION) for endoscopic submucosal dissection using a scissor-type knife: An animal pilot study and clinical experiences

Effectiveness of a novel traction device (TRACMOTION) for endoscopic submucosal dissection using a scissor-type knife: An animal pilot study and clinical experiences

A newly developed articulated through-the-scope traction device, TRACMOTION, has been used clinically for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, there are few reports on the characteristics of this device and the lesion types for which it is most effective. Therefore, we evaluated its optimal use, efficacy, and safety clinically in animals. Subsequently, we confirmed the safety and efficacy of ESD using this device in humans. Two live swine were used; one underwent conventional ESD (C-ESD) and the other traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD). To examine the traction effect at each resection site, three ESD ulcers (greater curvature/anterior wall/posterior wall) with a diameter of approximately 40 mm were created in each swine. Based on our preliminary experiments, scissor-type and needle-type knives were used in the T-ESD and C-ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was the resection speed, and the secondary endpoint was the degree of muscle layer damage. T-ESD was faster than C-ESD on the posterior wall, similar to the greater curvature, and T-ESD was slower than C-ESD on the anterior wall. There were no cases of intraoperative perforations. Obvious muscle layer damage was observed in post-C-ESD wounds on the anterior wall. The submucosal layer was retained in all post-T-ESD wounds. Although this study showed that ESD with TRACMOTION may be safe and effective, it is necessary to consider that it may be unsuitable for some lesions. This may be due to device characteristics and requires further validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信