Matthias Carl Laupichler, Alexandra Aster, Lara Soyubey, Gilda Masala, Greta Winkelhorst, Rike Remmert, Tobias Raupach, Anthea Peters
{"title":"播客的主动制作与被动消费对医学生学习成果的影响。","authors":"Matthias Carl Laupichler, Alexandra Aster, Lara Soyubey, Gilda Masala, Greta Winkelhorst, Rike Remmert, Tobias Raupach, Anthea Peters","doi":"10.1111/tct.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In recent years, podcasts have been increasingly deployed in medical education. However, studies often fail to evaluate the learning outcomes from these podcasts effectively. The aim of this study was to determine whether the active production of podcasts enhances students' knowledge compared to the passive consumption of student-produced podcasts, as it increases the engagement with the learning content through active learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study was conducted at a German medical school during the fifth-year paediatrics block internship. The final sample consisted of 86 students who were divided into small groups that produced podcasts on one paediatric topic on the first day and listened to a podcast on another topic on the second day.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The first group, which produced a podcast on topic A and only listened to a podcast on topic B, performed significantly better on questions on topic A than on questions on topic B, (<i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>d</i> = 0.63). This effect was not observed in the second group, which produced a podcast on topic B and listened to a podcast on topic A (<i>p</i> = 0.81, <i>d</i> = 0.04). Additionally, it was found that a longer time interval between podcast production and the knowledge test led to poorer memory performance (<i>β</i> = 1.10, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While the differing results between the two groups may be due to a lack of power to detect meaningful differences, this study nonetheless provides initial evidence that the active production of podcasts may enhance the learning outcomes of medical students.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Not applicable</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Active Production Versus Passive Consumption of Podcasts on Medical Students' Learning Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Carl Laupichler, Alexandra Aster, Lara Soyubey, Gilda Masala, Greta Winkelhorst, Rike Remmert, Tobias Raupach, Anthea Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>In recent years, podcasts have been increasingly deployed in medical education. However, studies often fail to evaluate the learning outcomes from these podcasts effectively. The aim of this study was to determine whether the active production of podcasts enhances students' knowledge compared to the passive consumption of student-produced podcasts, as it increases the engagement with the learning content through active learning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study was conducted at a German medical school during the fifth-year paediatrics block internship. The final sample consisted of 86 students who were divided into small groups that produced podcasts on one paediatric topic on the first day and listened to a podcast on another topic on the second day.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The first group, which produced a podcast on topic A and only listened to a podcast on topic B, performed significantly better on questions on topic A than on questions on topic B, (<i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>d</i> = 0.63). This effect was not observed in the second group, which produced a podcast on topic B and listened to a podcast on topic A (<i>p</i> = 0.81, <i>d</i> = 0.04). Additionally, it was found that a longer time interval between podcast production and the knowledge test led to poorer memory performance (<i>β</i> = 1.10, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While the differing results between the two groups may be due to a lack of power to detect meaningful differences, this study nonetheless provides initial evidence that the active production of podcasts may enhance the learning outcomes of medical students.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Not applicable</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70029\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of Active Production Versus Passive Consumption of Podcasts on Medical Students' Learning Outcomes
Introduction
In recent years, podcasts have been increasingly deployed in medical education. However, studies often fail to evaluate the learning outcomes from these podcasts effectively. The aim of this study was to determine whether the active production of podcasts enhances students' knowledge compared to the passive consumption of student-produced podcasts, as it increases the engagement with the learning content through active learning.
Methods
The study was conducted at a German medical school during the fifth-year paediatrics block internship. The final sample consisted of 86 students who were divided into small groups that produced podcasts on one paediatric topic on the first day and listened to a podcast on another topic on the second day.
Results
The first group, which produced a podcast on topic A and only listened to a podcast on topic B, performed significantly better on questions on topic A than on questions on topic B, (p < 0.01, d = 0.63). This effect was not observed in the second group, which produced a podcast on topic B and listened to a podcast on topic A (p = 0.81, d = 0.04). Additionally, it was found that a longer time interval between podcast production and the knowledge test led to poorer memory performance (β = 1.10, p = 0.04).
Conclusion
While the differing results between the two groups may be due to a lack of power to detect meaningful differences, this study nonetheless provides initial evidence that the active production of podcasts may enhance the learning outcomes of medical students.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.