Giulia Pieracci, Federica Satriano, Antonio Liberatore D'Agostino, Marta Rodini, Carlo Caltagirone, Rita Formisano, Vincenzo Vinicola, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
{"title":"加速长期遗忘:一种神经心理学工具在健康受试者中的设计和验证,以及在一组严重后天性脑损伤受试者中的诊断准确性。","authors":"Giulia Pieracci, Federica Satriano, Antonio Liberatore D'Agostino, Marta Rodini, Carlo Caltagirone, Rita Formisano, Vincenzo Vinicola, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2449564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accelerated Long-term Forgetting (ALF) is a phenomenon characterized by abnormal memory forgetting over hours or days, despite normal initial acquisition. Because standardized memory assessments typically test memory retention over delays of up to 30 minutes, ALF may be undetected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first Experiment of the present study was aimed to validate, in a sample of healthy subjects (<i>n</i> = 54, 20 to 79 years old), a long-term verbal and visuospatial memory procedure, using common tests but administered at extended intervals. In Experiment 2, we aimed to explore ALF pattern in a sample of patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) who subjectively complained of memory difficulties and nevertheless obtained normal or only mildly deficient scores on traditional memory tasks (<i>n</i> = 10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of Experiment 1 showed that both the verbal and visuo-spatial memory tasks proved to be valid and effective at illustrating the phenomenon of forgetting along the time intervals considered. Moreover, a significant association was found between higher saving scores passing from the 30 min to the 24 hr interval of the verbal test and the score obtained on a questionnaire assessing the subjective feeling of memory functioning. Results of Experiment 2 showed that patients with sABI obtained reduced 30 m-24hr saving scores on the verbal test as compared to healthy controls despite comparable forgetting at earlier and later delays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the utility of extended memory assessment, thus the need for validation of specific diagnostic tools in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated long-term forgetting: Design and validation of a neuropsychological tool in healthy subjects and diagnostic accuracy in a group of subjects with severe acquired brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Pieracci, Federica Satriano, Antonio Liberatore D'Agostino, Marta Rodini, Carlo Caltagirone, Rita Formisano, Vincenzo Vinicola, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2449564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accelerated Long-term Forgetting (ALF) is a phenomenon characterized by abnormal memory forgetting over hours or days, despite normal initial acquisition. Because standardized memory assessments typically test memory retention over delays of up to 30 minutes, ALF may be undetected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first Experiment of the present study was aimed to validate, in a sample of healthy subjects (<i>n</i> = 54, 20 to 79 years old), a long-term verbal and visuospatial memory procedure, using common tests but administered at extended intervals. In Experiment 2, we aimed to explore ALF pattern in a sample of patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) who subjectively complained of memory difficulties and nevertheless obtained normal or only mildly deficient scores on traditional memory tasks (<i>n</i> = 10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of Experiment 1 showed that both the verbal and visuo-spatial memory tasks proved to be valid and effective at illustrating the phenomenon of forgetting along the time intervals considered. Moreover, a significant association was found between higher saving scores passing from the 30 min to the 24 hr interval of the verbal test and the score obtained on a questionnaire assessing the subjective feeling of memory functioning. Results of Experiment 2 showed that patients with sABI obtained reduced 30 m-24hr saving scores on the verbal test as compared to healthy controls despite comparable forgetting at earlier and later delays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the utility of extended memory assessment, thus the need for validation of specific diagnostic tools in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2449564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2449564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accelerated long-term forgetting: Design and validation of a neuropsychological tool in healthy subjects and diagnostic accuracy in a group of subjects with severe acquired brain injury.
Objective: Accelerated Long-term Forgetting (ALF) is a phenomenon characterized by abnormal memory forgetting over hours or days, despite normal initial acquisition. Because standardized memory assessments typically test memory retention over delays of up to 30 minutes, ALF may be undetected.
Methods: The first Experiment of the present study was aimed to validate, in a sample of healthy subjects (n = 54, 20 to 79 years old), a long-term verbal and visuospatial memory procedure, using common tests but administered at extended intervals. In Experiment 2, we aimed to explore ALF pattern in a sample of patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) who subjectively complained of memory difficulties and nevertheless obtained normal or only mildly deficient scores on traditional memory tasks (n = 10).
Results: Results of Experiment 1 showed that both the verbal and visuo-spatial memory tasks proved to be valid and effective at illustrating the phenomenon of forgetting along the time intervals considered. Moreover, a significant association was found between higher saving scores passing from the 30 min to the 24 hr interval of the verbal test and the score obtained on a questionnaire assessing the subjective feeling of memory functioning. Results of Experiment 2 showed that patients with sABI obtained reduced 30 m-24hr saving scores on the verbal test as compared to healthy controls despite comparable forgetting at earlier and later delays.
Conclusions: These findings support the utility of extended memory assessment, thus the need for validation of specific diagnostic tools in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.