陆生植物的生态毒理学生物分析:标准、指南和协议的整体观点。

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Leonardo Mendes da Silva, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira
{"title":"陆生植物的生态毒理学生物分析:标准、指南和协议的整体观点。","authors":"Leonardo Mendes da Silva, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2024.2440876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems face various chemicals that might induce acute and/or long-term harm. To assess these impacts, ecotoxicological bioassays are essential. However, bioassays using animals, particularly mammals, are costly, time-consuming, and raise ethical concerns. In this context, terrestrial plants emerge as a viable alternative to conventional assays. Thus, the aim of this review was to address the history and evolution of plant bioassays, highlighting the main regulations, guidelines, and protocols governing the use of terrestrial plants in ecotoxicological tests. Initially, plant bioassays were employed to assess the cytogenotoxic effects of chemicals, gaining prominence with the GENE-TOX program in the 80s. Subsequently, plants were used in allelopathy bioassays and in studies aimed to examine the ecotoxicity of pesticides in soil. Currently, ecotoxicological bioassays with plants are regulated by specific standards, such as ASTM E1963-22, EPA 600/3-88/029, EPS 1/RM/45, ISO 11269-1, ISO 11269-2, ISO 17126, ISO 18763, ISO 29200, ISO 22030, OECD-208, OECD-227, OCSPP 850.4100, OCSPP 850.4230, OCSPP 850.4800 and OPPTS 850.4200. The existing protocols standardize bioassays in greenhouse and lab environments, and the duration of the tests varies from hours to months. The main ecotoxicological parameters to be analyzed after exposure include germination percentage, survival rate, root length, aerial part length, fresh mass of exposed plants, and phytotoxicity symptoms. In addition, the absorption rate of substances and genotoxic and mutagenic effects might also be assessed. Therefore, data in this review demonstrate that terrestrial plants represent an important tool in the analysis of environmental risks associated with chemicals and might serve as crucial allies in modern ecotoxicology.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-39"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecotoxicological bioassays with terrestrial plants: a holistic view of standards, guidelines, and protocols.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Mendes da Silva, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10937404.2024.2440876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems face various chemicals that might induce acute and/or long-term harm. To assess these impacts, ecotoxicological bioassays are essential. However, bioassays using animals, particularly mammals, are costly, time-consuming, and raise ethical concerns. In this context, terrestrial plants emerge as a viable alternative to conventional assays. Thus, the aim of this review was to address the history and evolution of plant bioassays, highlighting the main regulations, guidelines, and protocols governing the use of terrestrial plants in ecotoxicological tests. Initially, plant bioassays were employed to assess the cytogenotoxic effects of chemicals, gaining prominence with the GENE-TOX program in the 80s. Subsequently, plants were used in allelopathy bioassays and in studies aimed to examine the ecotoxicity of pesticides in soil. Currently, ecotoxicological bioassays with plants are regulated by specific standards, such as ASTM E1963-22, EPA 600/3-88/029, EPS 1/RM/45, ISO 11269-1, ISO 11269-2, ISO 17126, ISO 18763, ISO 29200, ISO 22030, OECD-208, OECD-227, OCSPP 850.4100, OCSPP 850.4230, OCSPP 850.4800 and OPPTS 850.4200. The existing protocols standardize bioassays in greenhouse and lab environments, and the duration of the tests varies from hours to months. The main ecotoxicological parameters to be analyzed after exposure include germination percentage, survival rate, root length, aerial part length, fresh mass of exposed plants, and phytotoxicity symptoms. In addition, the absorption rate of substances and genotoxic and mutagenic effects might also be assessed. Therefore, data in this review demonstrate that terrestrial plants represent an important tool in the analysis of environmental risks associated with chemicals and might serve as crucial allies in modern ecotoxicology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2024.2440876\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2024.2440876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

陆地和水生生态系统面临可能造成急性和/或长期危害的各种化学物质。为了评估这些影响,生态毒理学生物分析是必不可少的。然而,使用动物,特别是哺乳动物进行生物测定,成本高,耗时长,并引起伦理问题。在这种情况下,陆生植物成为替代传统分析方法的可行方法。因此,本综述的目的是阐述植物生物测定的历史和演变,强调在生态毒理学试验中使用陆生植物的主要法规、指南和方案。最初,植物生物测定被用于评估化学物质的细胞基因毒性作用,在80年代随着GENE-TOX计划而得到重视。随后,植物被用于化感作用生物测定和旨在检查土壤中农药生态毒性的研究。目前,植物生态毒理学生物测定有特定的标准,如ASTM E1963-22、EPA 600/3-88/029、EPS 1/RM/45、ISO 11269-1、ISO 11269-2、ISO 17126、ISO 18763、ISO 29200、ISO 22030、OECD-208、OECD-227、OCSPP 850.4100、OCSPP 850.4230、OCSPP 850.4800和OPPTS 850.4200。现有的规程使温室和实验室环境中的生物测定标准化,测试的持续时间从几小时到几个月不等。暴露后分析的主要生态毒理学参数包括发芽率、存活率、根长、地上部长、暴露植株的鲜质量和植物毒性症状。此外,还可以评估物质的吸收率和基因毒性和诱变效应。因此,本综述的数据表明,陆生植物是分析与化学品相关的环境风险的重要工具,可能是现代生态毒理学的重要盟友。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecotoxicological bioassays with terrestrial plants: a holistic view of standards, guidelines, and protocols.

Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems face various chemicals that might induce acute and/or long-term harm. To assess these impacts, ecotoxicological bioassays are essential. However, bioassays using animals, particularly mammals, are costly, time-consuming, and raise ethical concerns. In this context, terrestrial plants emerge as a viable alternative to conventional assays. Thus, the aim of this review was to address the history and evolution of plant bioassays, highlighting the main regulations, guidelines, and protocols governing the use of terrestrial plants in ecotoxicological tests. Initially, plant bioassays were employed to assess the cytogenotoxic effects of chemicals, gaining prominence with the GENE-TOX program in the 80s. Subsequently, plants were used in allelopathy bioassays and in studies aimed to examine the ecotoxicity of pesticides in soil. Currently, ecotoxicological bioassays with plants are regulated by specific standards, such as ASTM E1963-22, EPA 600/3-88/029, EPS 1/RM/45, ISO 11269-1, ISO 11269-2, ISO 17126, ISO 18763, ISO 29200, ISO 22030, OECD-208, OECD-227, OCSPP 850.4100, OCSPP 850.4230, OCSPP 850.4800 and OPPTS 850.4200. The existing protocols standardize bioassays in greenhouse and lab environments, and the duration of the tests varies from hours to months. The main ecotoxicological parameters to be analyzed after exposure include germination percentage, survival rate, root length, aerial part length, fresh mass of exposed plants, and phytotoxicity symptoms. In addition, the absorption rate of substances and genotoxic and mutagenic effects might also be assessed. Therefore, data in this review demonstrate that terrestrial plants represent an important tool in the analysis of environmental risks associated with chemicals and might serve as crucial allies in modern ecotoxicology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信