印度、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚私营卫生部门的COVID-19政策和结核病服务。

IF 1.9 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Charity Oga-Omenka, Vijayashree Yellappa, Bony Wiem Lestari, Angelina Sassi, Surbhi Sheokand, Bolanle Olusola-Faleye, Lavanya Huria, Laura Jane Brubacher, Elaine Baruwa, Bachti Alisjahbana, Madhukar Pai
{"title":"印度、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚私营卫生部门的COVID-19政策和结核病服务。","authors":"Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Charity Oga-Omenka, Vijayashree Yellappa, Bony Wiem Lestari, Angelina Sassi, Surbhi Sheokand, Bolanle Olusola-Faleye, Lavanya Huria, Laura Jane Brubacher, Elaine Baruwa, Bachti Alisjahbana, Madhukar Pai","doi":"10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges in the field of global health. Nigeria, Indonesia and India are three high tuberculosis (TB) burden countries with large private health sectors. Both TB and the private health sector faced challenges in these countries because of COVID-19. This study aimed to compare the COVID-19 control measures and policies in the provision of TB care services and gain insights from policymakers on how the pandemic affected the provision of TB services in the private healthcare sector, how each country adapted, and identify lessons learned for health system preparedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted among a purposive sample of 11 national and sub-national policymakers in each country. Thematic content analysis was conducted on the data collected using an adapted WHO Health Equity Policy Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed three policy dimensions under costs, access, and quality. Under healthcare costs, policymakers highlighted resource allocation and diversion of TB resources to COVID response, and increased operational costs for private provider. Under healthcare access, key themes included reduced TB case detection due to fear of COVID-19, disrupted diagnostic services, and adaptations such as extended medicine supplies and tele-consultations. Under healthcare quality, themes included compromised TB diagnostic accuracy due to similar respiratory symptoms with COVID-19, and strain on laboratory infrastructure due to competing demands from both diseases. Policymakers across the three countries pointed to the need for strengthening private-public partnerships (PPP) for healthcare service delivery and continued private sector investment to facilitate the continuity of TB care within a pandemic context.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study provide an overview of the impact of the pandemic from the perspective of private facilities and policymakers in Nigeria, Indonesia and India, which can inform future policy and ways forward in strengthening PPP for healthcare service delivery in high TB burden countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":37942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","volume":"38 ","pages":"100503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 policies and tuberculosis services in private health sectors of India, Indonesia, and Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Charity Oga-Omenka, Vijayashree Yellappa, Bony Wiem Lestari, Angelina Sassi, Surbhi Sheokand, Bolanle Olusola-Faleye, Lavanya Huria, Laura Jane Brubacher, Elaine Baruwa, Bachti Alisjahbana, Madhukar Pai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges in the field of global health. Nigeria, Indonesia and India are three high tuberculosis (TB) burden countries with large private health sectors. Both TB and the private health sector faced challenges in these countries because of COVID-19. This study aimed to compare the COVID-19 control measures and policies in the provision of TB care services and gain insights from policymakers on how the pandemic affected the provision of TB services in the private healthcare sector, how each country adapted, and identify lessons learned for health system preparedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted among a purposive sample of 11 national and sub-national policymakers in each country. Thematic content analysis was conducted on the data collected using an adapted WHO Health Equity Policy Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed three policy dimensions under costs, access, and quality. Under healthcare costs, policymakers highlighted resource allocation and diversion of TB resources to COVID response, and increased operational costs for private provider. Under healthcare access, key themes included reduced TB case detection due to fear of COVID-19, disrupted diagnostic services, and adaptations such as extended medicine supplies and tele-consultations. Under healthcare quality, themes included compromised TB diagnostic accuracy due to similar respiratory symptoms with COVID-19, and strain on laboratory infrastructure due to competing demands from both diseases. Policymakers across the three countries pointed to the need for strengthening private-public partnerships (PPP) for healthcare service delivery and continued private sector investment to facilitate the continuity of TB care within a pandemic context.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study provide an overview of the impact of the pandemic from the perspective of private facilities and policymakers in Nigeria, Indonesia and India, which can inform future policy and ways forward in strengthening PPP for healthcare service delivery in high TB burden countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"100503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球卫生领域带来了前所未有的挑战。尼日利亚、印度尼西亚和印度是结核病高负担国家,拥有庞大的私营卫生部门。由于COVID-19,这些国家的结核病和私营卫生部门都面临挑战。本研究旨在比较在提供结核病治疗服务方面的COVID-19控制措施和政策,并从政策制定者那里了解大流行如何影响私营医疗保健部门提供结核病服务,每个国家如何适应,并确定卫生系统准备工作的经验教训。方法:在每个国家的11个国家级和次国家级政策制定者的有目的样本中进行定性深入访谈。对使用经改编的世卫组织卫生公平政策框架收集的数据进行了专题内容分析。结果:结果揭示了成本、可及性和质量三个政策维度。在医疗成本项下,政策制定者强调了资源分配和结核病资源用于应对COVID的转移,以及私营提供商的运营成本增加。在卫生保健可及性方面,主要主题包括由于对COVID-19的恐惧而减少结核病病例发现、诊断服务中断以及扩大药品供应和远程咨询等适应措施。在卫生保健质量方面,主题包括由于与COVID-19相似的呼吸道症状导致结核病诊断准确性降低,以及由于两种疾病的竞争需求而对实验室基础设施造成压力。三国决策者指出,有必要加强医疗保健服务的公私伙伴关系(PPP),并继续进行私营部门投资,以促进在大流行背景下结核病治疗的连续性。结论:本研究的结果从尼日利亚、印度尼西亚和印度的私营机构和决策者的角度概述了结核病大流行的影响,这可以为未来的政策和在结核病高负担国家加强PPP医疗服务提供的方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 policies and tuberculosis services in private health sectors of India, Indonesia, and Nigeria.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges in the field of global health. Nigeria, Indonesia and India are three high tuberculosis (TB) burden countries with large private health sectors. Both TB and the private health sector faced challenges in these countries because of COVID-19. This study aimed to compare the COVID-19 control measures and policies in the provision of TB care services and gain insights from policymakers on how the pandemic affected the provision of TB services in the private healthcare sector, how each country adapted, and identify lessons learned for health system preparedness.

Methods: Qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted among a purposive sample of 11 national and sub-national policymakers in each country. Thematic content analysis was conducted on the data collected using an adapted WHO Health Equity Policy Framework.

Results: Results revealed three policy dimensions under costs, access, and quality. Under healthcare costs, policymakers highlighted resource allocation and diversion of TB resources to COVID response, and increased operational costs for private provider. Under healthcare access, key themes included reduced TB case detection due to fear of COVID-19, disrupted diagnostic services, and adaptations such as extended medicine supplies and tele-consultations. Under healthcare quality, themes included compromised TB diagnostic accuracy due to similar respiratory symptoms with COVID-19, and strain on laboratory infrastructure due to competing demands from both diseases. Policymakers across the three countries pointed to the need for strengthening private-public partnerships (PPP) for healthcare service delivery and continued private sector investment to facilitate the continuity of TB care within a pandemic context.

Conclusion: The results of this study provide an overview of the impact of the pandemic from the perspective of private facilities and policymakers in Nigeria, Indonesia and India, which can inform future policy and ways forward in strengthening PPP for healthcare service delivery in high TB burden countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases aims to provide a forum for clinically relevant articles on all aspects of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections, including (but not limited to) epidemiology, clinical investigation, transmission, diagnosis, treatment, drug-resistance and public policy, and encourages the submission of clinical studies, thematic reviews and case reports. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases is an Open Access publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信