促进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的家长提醒召回信的评价。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Joan M. Griffin , Xuan Zhu , Wei Yi Kong , Robert M. Jacobson , Kathy L. MacLaughlin , Jennifer L. St. Sauver , Jeph Herrin , Gregory D. Jenkins , Nicole L. Larson , Lila J. Finney Rutten
{"title":"促进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的家长提醒召回信的评价。","authors":"Joan M. Griffin ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Yi Kong ,&nbsp;Robert M. Jacobson ,&nbsp;Kathy L. MacLaughlin ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. St. Sauver ,&nbsp;Jeph Herrin ,&nbsp;Gregory D. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Nicole L. Larson ,&nbsp;Lila J. Finney Rutten","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake remains suboptimal. Our stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial found that reminder-recall letters sent to parents of age-eligible children significantly increased vaccine uptake compared to usual care. Subsequently, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the mechanisms of the letter's effectiveness. This study evaluated who remembered the letter, use of provided resources, and child vaccination status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional evaluation included data from parents (<em>n</em> = 1165) of adolescents ages 11–12 from six primary care practices who received letters about their child's HPV vaccination status. From 2018 to 2022, parents were mailed reminder-recall letters and then sent questionnaires 12–15 months after receiving the letter. Questionnaires asked if parents recalled the letter, whether their child received a vaccination and, if not, reasons for not vaccinating, and attitudes and beliefs about HPV vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1165 of 1991 questionnaires were completed (59 %). Over half (58 %) remembered the reminder-recall letter. Compared to those not remembering the letter, those who did were significantly more likely to have had their child vaccinated (56 % versus 44 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Of those who remembered the letter but did not vaccinate, the majority reported misperceptions about their child being too young (26 %) or concerns about vaccine safety (20 %). Of those who did not remember the letter and did not vaccinate, the primary reason was not knowing the child was due for vaccination (27 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Reminder-recall letters cued the majority of parents to complete HPV vaccination; however, vaccine misperceptions remain a challenge, indicating the need for additional communication strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 102942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of parent reminder-recall letters to promote human papillomavirus vaccination\",\"authors\":\"Joan M. Griffin ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Yi Kong ,&nbsp;Robert M. Jacobson ,&nbsp;Kathy L. MacLaughlin ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. St. Sauver ,&nbsp;Jeph Herrin ,&nbsp;Gregory D. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Nicole L. Larson ,&nbsp;Lila J. Finney Rutten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake remains suboptimal. Our stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial found that reminder-recall letters sent to parents of age-eligible children significantly increased vaccine uptake compared to usual care. Subsequently, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the mechanisms of the letter's effectiveness. This study evaluated who remembered the letter, use of provided resources, and child vaccination status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional evaluation included data from parents (<em>n</em> = 1165) of adolescents ages 11–12 from six primary care practices who received letters about their child's HPV vaccination status. From 2018 to 2022, parents were mailed reminder-recall letters and then sent questionnaires 12–15 months after receiving the letter. Questionnaires asked if parents recalled the letter, whether their child received a vaccination and, if not, reasons for not vaccinating, and attitudes and beliefs about HPV vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1165 of 1991 questionnaires were completed (59 %). Over half (58 %) remembered the reminder-recall letter. Compared to those not remembering the letter, those who did were significantly more likely to have had their child vaccinated (56 % versus 44 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Of those who remembered the letter but did not vaccinate, the majority reported misperceptions about their child being too young (26 %) or concerns about vaccine safety (20 %). Of those who did not remember the letter and did not vaccinate, the primary reason was not knowing the child was due for vaccination (27 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Reminder-recall letters cued the majority of parents to complete HPV vaccination; however, vaccine misperceptions remain a challenge, indicating the need for additional communication strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699728/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524003577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524003577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的摄取仍然不够理想。我们的楔步聚类随机试验发现,与常规护理相比,向适龄儿童的父母发送提醒召回信显著增加了疫苗的吸收率。随后,我们进行了流程评估,以评估信函有效性的机制。这项研究评估了谁记住了这封信,所提供的资源的使用,以及儿童的疫苗接种状况。方法:这项横断面评估包括来自6个初级保健诊所的11-12岁青少年父母(n = 1165)的数据,这些父母收到了关于其孩子HPV疫苗接种状况的信件。从2018年到2022年,父母们收到了提醒召回信,然后在收到信的12-15个月后发送了问卷。问卷询问父母是否记得这封信,他们的孩子是否接种了疫苗,如果没有,不接种疫苗的原因,以及对HPV疫苗接种的态度和信念。结果:1991份问卷共完成1165份(59%)。超过一半(58%)的人记得这封提醒召回信。与那些不记得这封信的人相比,那些记得这封信的人更有可能让他们的孩子接种疫苗(56%对44%,p)结论:提醒召回信提示大多数父母完成HPV疫苗接种;然而,对疫苗的误解仍然是一个挑战,这表明需要制定更多的宣传战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of parent reminder-recall letters to promote human papillomavirus vaccination

Objective

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake remains suboptimal. Our stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial found that reminder-recall letters sent to parents of age-eligible children significantly increased vaccine uptake compared to usual care. Subsequently, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the mechanisms of the letter's effectiveness. This study evaluated who remembered the letter, use of provided resources, and child vaccination status.

Methods

This cross-sectional evaluation included data from parents (n = 1165) of adolescents ages 11–12 from six primary care practices who received letters about their child's HPV vaccination status. From 2018 to 2022, parents were mailed reminder-recall letters and then sent questionnaires 12–15 months after receiving the letter. Questionnaires asked if parents recalled the letter, whether their child received a vaccination and, if not, reasons for not vaccinating, and attitudes and beliefs about HPV vaccination.

Results

A total of 1165 of 1991 questionnaires were completed (59 %). Over half (58 %) remembered the reminder-recall letter. Compared to those not remembering the letter, those who did were significantly more likely to have had their child vaccinated (56 % versus 44 %, p < 0.05). Of those who remembered the letter but did not vaccinate, the majority reported misperceptions about their child being too young (26 %) or concerns about vaccine safety (20 %). Of those who did not remember the letter and did not vaccinate, the primary reason was not knowing the child was due for vaccination (27 %).

Conclusions

Reminder-recall letters cued the majority of parents to complete HPV vaccination; however, vaccine misperceptions remain a challenge, indicating the need for additional communication strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信