Taissa A Bej, Brigid M Wilson, Ukwen C Akpoji, Nicole Mongilardi, Tayoot Todd Chengsupanimit, Sunah Song, Corinne Kowal, Krysttel C Stryczek, Rene Hearns, Mark Honsberger, Tai-Lyn Wilkerson, Christine Firestone, Soumya Subramaniam, Lauren Stevenson, Sherry L Ball, Robin L P Jump, Federico Perez
{"title":"低强度干预影响门诊抗生素处方率的可行性:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Taissa A Bej, Brigid M Wilson, Ukwen C Akpoji, Nicole Mongilardi, Tayoot Todd Chengsupanimit, Sunah Song, Corinne Kowal, Krysttel C Stryczek, Rene Hearns, Mark Honsberger, Tai-Lyn Wilkerson, Christine Firestone, Soumya Subramaniam, Lauren Stevenson, Sherry L Ball, Robin L P Jump, Federico Perez","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs) may modify their antibiotic prescription practices if aware of their potentially damaging impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial at 12 Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinics. PCPs at clinics randomized to the intervention group received quarterly antibiotic use reports with feedback about antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory infections and adverse event letters alerting about <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection or antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria among their patients. The main outcome, antibiotic prescriptions in primary care visits, was compared in the preintervention (April-September 2020), intervention (October 2020 to September 2021), and postintervention periods (September 2021 to September 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 PCPs at 6 clinics in the intervention group, 66% (33 of 52) and 54% (28 of 52) received ≥1 antibiotic use report and adverse event letter. In the intervention clinics, the proportion of primary care visits with antibiotic prescription during the preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods was 1.4% (1088 of 77 697), 1.4% (2051 of 147 858), and 1.3% (1692 of 131 530). In the control clinics, this increased from 1.8% (1560 of 87 897) to 2.1% (3707 of 176 825) and 2.1% (3418 of 162 979), respectively, during the intervention and postintervention periods. The rate of visits with antibiotic prescription did not differ in the preintervention period (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.10 [.87-1.39); <i>P</i> = .43) but did during the intervention (1.30 [1.04-1.62]; <i>P</i> = .022) and postintervention periods (1.38 [1.09-1.74]; <i>P</i> = .007). There were no differences in emergency department visits and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCPs from clinics assigned to a low-intensity intervention combining comparative feedback with adverse event notifications had lower antibiotic prescription rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 1","pages":"ofae725"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a Low-Intensity Intervention to Influence Antibiotic Prescribing Rates Use in Outpatient Settings: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Taissa A Bej, Brigid M Wilson, Ukwen C Akpoji, Nicole Mongilardi, Tayoot Todd Chengsupanimit, Sunah Song, Corinne Kowal, Krysttel C Stryczek, Rene Hearns, Mark Honsberger, Tai-Lyn Wilkerson, Christine Firestone, Soumya Subramaniam, Lauren Stevenson, Sherry L Ball, Robin L P Jump, Federico Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs) may modify their antibiotic prescription practices if aware of their potentially damaging impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial at 12 Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinics. PCPs at clinics randomized to the intervention group received quarterly antibiotic use reports with feedback about antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory infections and adverse event letters alerting about <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection or antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria among their patients. The main outcome, antibiotic prescriptions in primary care visits, was compared in the preintervention (April-September 2020), intervention (October 2020 to September 2021), and postintervention periods (September 2021 to September 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 PCPs at 6 clinics in the intervention group, 66% (33 of 52) and 54% (28 of 52) received ≥1 antibiotic use report and adverse event letter. In the intervention clinics, the proportion of primary care visits with antibiotic prescription during the preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods was 1.4% (1088 of 77 697), 1.4% (2051 of 147 858), and 1.3% (1692 of 131 530). In the control clinics, this increased from 1.8% (1560 of 87 897) to 2.1% (3707 of 176 825) and 2.1% (3418 of 162 979), respectively, during the intervention and postintervention periods. The rate of visits with antibiotic prescription did not differ in the preintervention period (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.10 [.87-1.39); <i>P</i> = .43) but did during the intervention (1.30 [1.04-1.62]; <i>P</i> = .022) and postintervention periods (1.38 [1.09-1.74]; <i>P</i> = .007). There were no differences in emergency department visits and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCPs from clinics assigned to a low-intensity intervention combining comparative feedback with adverse event notifications had lower antibiotic prescription rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"ofae725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697152/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility of a Low-Intensity Intervention to Influence Antibiotic Prescribing Rates Use in Outpatient Settings: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) may modify their antibiotic prescription practices if aware of their potentially damaging impact.
Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial at 12 Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinics. PCPs at clinics randomized to the intervention group received quarterly antibiotic use reports with feedback about antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory infections and adverse event letters alerting about Clostridioides difficile infection or antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria among their patients. The main outcome, antibiotic prescriptions in primary care visits, was compared in the preintervention (April-September 2020), intervention (October 2020 to September 2021), and postintervention periods (September 2021 to September 2022).
Results: Among 52 PCPs at 6 clinics in the intervention group, 66% (33 of 52) and 54% (28 of 52) received ≥1 antibiotic use report and adverse event letter. In the intervention clinics, the proportion of primary care visits with antibiotic prescription during the preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods was 1.4% (1088 of 77 697), 1.4% (2051 of 147 858), and 1.3% (1692 of 131 530). In the control clinics, this increased from 1.8% (1560 of 87 897) to 2.1% (3707 of 176 825) and 2.1% (3418 of 162 979), respectively, during the intervention and postintervention periods. The rate of visits with antibiotic prescription did not differ in the preintervention period (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.10 [.87-1.39); P = .43) but did during the intervention (1.30 [1.04-1.62]; P = .022) and postintervention periods (1.38 [1.09-1.74]; P = .007). There were no differences in emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Conclusions: PCPs from clinics assigned to a low-intensity intervention combining comparative feedback with adverse event notifications had lower antibiotic prescription rates.
期刊介绍:
Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.