Davide Ferrari, Stefano Siboni, Marco Sozzi, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Ivan Kristo, Salvatore Tolone, Elisa Marabotto, Daniele Bernardi, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Benjamin D Rogers, Anthony Hobson, Jordan Haworth, Yeong Yeh Lee, Brian E Louie, Takahiro Masuda, Megan L Ivy, Pamela Milito, Erica Centorrino, Dimitrios Theodorou, Tania Triantafyllou, Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Vincent Tee, Lorenzo Cusmai, Roberto Penagini, Marina Coletta, Edoardo Savarino, Emanuele Asti, C Prakash Gyawali, Nicola De Bortoli
{"title":"米兰评分预测2型食管胃交界区患者胃食管反流病","authors":"Davide Ferrari, Stefano Siboni, Marco Sozzi, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Ivan Kristo, Salvatore Tolone, Elisa Marabotto, Daniele Bernardi, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Benjamin D Rogers, Anthony Hobson, Jordan Haworth, Yeong Yeh Lee, Brian E Louie, Takahiro Masuda, Megan L Ivy, Pamela Milito, Erica Centorrino, Dimitrios Theodorou, Tania Triantafyllou, Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Vincent Tee, Lorenzo Cusmai, Roberto Penagini, Marina Coletta, Edoardo Savarino, Emanuele Asti, C Prakash Gyawali, Nicola De Bortoli","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) disruption. While type 3 EGJ predicts definitive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), type 2 EGJ is less clearly implicated in GERD pathogenesis. This study aimed to characterize physiologic findings in type 2 EGJ to determine if the HRM-based Milan Score can define GERD within type 2 EGJ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>535 patients with suspected GERD who underwent HRM and reflux monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, HRM, and reflux study data were compared between the EGJ morphology subtypes, with objective GERD defined according to Lyon Consensus 2.0. The Milan Score, a novel metric that integrates ineffective esophageal motility, EGJ-contractile integral, EGJ morphology, and straight leg raise response, was abnormal when ≥ 137 (risk rate 50% for GERD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the Milan Score to predict objective GERD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Type 3 EGJ was associated with the highest rate of objective GERD, followed by type 2 and type 1 EGJ (p < 0.001), with a corresponding stepwise increase in AET from type 1 to 3 EGJ (p < 0.001). Type 2 EGJ with Milan Score < 137 resembled type 1 EGJ (objective GERD in 23.6% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.09), and type 2 EGJ with score ≥ 137 resembled type 3 EGJ (objective GERD in 88.2% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.11). On ROC analysis, the Milan Score had an area under the curve of 0.858.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While type 2 EGJ includes varying GERD severity, the Milan Score can segregate patients at risk for objective GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Milan Score Predicts Objective Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Type 2 Esophagogastric Junction.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Ferrari, Stefano Siboni, Marco Sozzi, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Ivan Kristo, Salvatore Tolone, Elisa Marabotto, Daniele Bernardi, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Benjamin D Rogers, Anthony Hobson, Jordan Haworth, Yeong Yeh Lee, Brian E Louie, Takahiro Masuda, Megan L Ivy, Pamela Milito, Erica Centorrino, Dimitrios Theodorou, Tania Triantafyllou, Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Vincent Tee, Lorenzo Cusmai, Roberto Penagini, Marina Coletta, Edoardo Savarino, Emanuele Asti, C Prakash Gyawali, Nicola De Bortoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) disruption. While type 3 EGJ predicts definitive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), type 2 EGJ is less clearly implicated in GERD pathogenesis. This study aimed to characterize physiologic findings in type 2 EGJ to determine if the HRM-based Milan Score can define GERD within type 2 EGJ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>535 patients with suspected GERD who underwent HRM and reflux monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, HRM, and reflux study data were compared between the EGJ morphology subtypes, with objective GERD defined according to Lyon Consensus 2.0. The Milan Score, a novel metric that integrates ineffective esophageal motility, EGJ-contractile integral, EGJ morphology, and straight leg raise response, was abnormal when ≥ 137 (risk rate 50% for GERD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the Milan Score to predict objective GERD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Type 3 EGJ was associated with the highest rate of objective GERD, followed by type 2 and type 1 EGJ (p < 0.001), with a corresponding stepwise increase in AET from type 1 to 3 EGJ (p < 0.001). Type 2 EGJ with Milan Score < 137 resembled type 1 EGJ (objective GERD in 23.6% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.09), and type 2 EGJ with score ≥ 137 resembled type 3 EGJ (objective GERD in 88.2% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.11). On ROC analysis, the Milan Score had an area under the curve of 0.858.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While type 2 EGJ includes varying GERD severity, the Milan Score can segregate patients at risk for objective GERD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14987\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Milan Score Predicts Objective Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Type 2 Esophagogastric Junction.
Introduction: High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) disruption. While type 3 EGJ predicts definitive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), type 2 EGJ is less clearly implicated in GERD pathogenesis. This study aimed to characterize physiologic findings in type 2 EGJ to determine if the HRM-based Milan Score can define GERD within type 2 EGJ.
Methods: 535 patients with suspected GERD who underwent HRM and reflux monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, HRM, and reflux study data were compared between the EGJ morphology subtypes, with objective GERD defined according to Lyon Consensus 2.0. The Milan Score, a novel metric that integrates ineffective esophageal motility, EGJ-contractile integral, EGJ morphology, and straight leg raise response, was abnormal when ≥ 137 (risk rate 50% for GERD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the Milan Score to predict objective GERD.
Results: Type 3 EGJ was associated with the highest rate of objective GERD, followed by type 2 and type 1 EGJ (p < 0.001), with a corresponding stepwise increase in AET from type 1 to 3 EGJ (p < 0.001). Type 2 EGJ with Milan Score < 137 resembled type 1 EGJ (objective GERD in 23.6% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.09), and type 2 EGJ with score ≥ 137 resembled type 3 EGJ (objective GERD in 88.2% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.11). On ROC analysis, the Milan Score had an area under the curve of 0.858.
Conclusion: While type 2 EGJ includes varying GERD severity, the Milan Score can segregate patients at risk for objective GERD.
期刊介绍：
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
