内镜鼻窦手术后鼻窦感染患者的微生物谱和耐药模式。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Avraham E Adelman, Akshay Tangutur, Alfredo S Archilla, Gennadiy Vengerovich
{"title":"内镜鼻窦手术后鼻窦感染患者的微生物谱和耐药模式。","authors":"Avraham E Adelman, Akshay Tangutur, Alfredo S Archilla, Gennadiy Vengerovich","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify common pathogens and antibiotic resistances in chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-endoscopic sinus surgery presenting with an active sinus infection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-institution rhinology private practice in Southeast Florida.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recorded postoperative endoscopically-guided sinus cultures from symptomatic patients with purulent drainage on endoscopy from August 2020 to December 2023. When available, pre- or intraoperatively cultured organisms were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 125 patients, 50.4% were female with a mean age of 51.0. In 34.4% of patients that underwent revision surgery, 76% had nasal polyps and 26.4% had asthma. Of 301 cultures, 264 (87.7%) were positive, 53 (17.6%) were polymicrobial, and 37 (12.3%) were negative. Of 351 total isolates, 165 (47%) were Gram-negative, 125 (35.6%) Gram-positive, 14 (4%) fungi, and 10 (2.8%) anaerobic. 46.9% of postoperative organisms were not cultured preoperatively. Gram-negative bacteria included Enterobacteriaceae (17.7%), Pseudomonas spp. (10.5%), Serratia spp. (5.1%). Gram-positive bacteria included Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, 17.1%) and Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, 8%). Antibiotic resistances included MSSA to penicillins (52.8%) and clindamycin (32.8%), and MRSA resistance to quinolones (53.6%) and clindamycin (35.7%). Enterobacteriaceae were 42% resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 37.1% to penicillins, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 17.7% resistant to quinolones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-sinus surgery grew a large proportion of Gram-negative organisms and significant Staphylococcal penicillin and Gram-negative amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance. Our findings indicate the benefit of culturing patients with this patient presentation. If cultures cannot be obtained, we suggest broad-spectrum antibiotics that consider wide Gram-negative coverage and local antibiotic resistance patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological Profiles and Patterns of Resistance in Patients With Sinus Infections After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Avraham E Adelman, Akshay Tangutur, Alfredo S Archilla, Gennadiy Vengerovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify common pathogens and antibiotic resistances in chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-endoscopic sinus surgery presenting with an active sinus infection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-institution rhinology private practice in Southeast Florida.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recorded postoperative endoscopically-guided sinus cultures from symptomatic patients with purulent drainage on endoscopy from August 2020 to December 2023. When available, pre- or intraoperatively cultured organisms were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 125 patients, 50.4% were female with a mean age of 51.0. In 34.4% of patients that underwent revision surgery, 76% had nasal polyps and 26.4% had asthma. Of 301 cultures, 264 (87.7%) were positive, 53 (17.6%) were polymicrobial, and 37 (12.3%) were negative. Of 351 total isolates, 165 (47%) were Gram-negative, 125 (35.6%) Gram-positive, 14 (4%) fungi, and 10 (2.8%) anaerobic. 46.9% of postoperative organisms were not cultured preoperatively. Gram-negative bacteria included Enterobacteriaceae (17.7%), Pseudomonas spp. (10.5%), Serratia spp. (5.1%). Gram-positive bacteria included Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, 17.1%) and Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, 8%). Antibiotic resistances included MSSA to penicillins (52.8%) and clindamycin (32.8%), and MRSA resistance to quinolones (53.6%) and clindamycin (35.7%). Enterobacteriaceae were 42% resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 37.1% to penicillins, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 17.7% resistant to quinolones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-sinus surgery grew a large proportion of Gram-negative organisms and significant Staphylococcal penicillin and Gram-negative amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance. Our findings indicate the benefit of culturing patients with this patient presentation. If cultures cannot be obtained, we suggest broad-spectrum antibiotics that consider wide Gram-negative coverage and local antibiotic resistance patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定慢性鼻窦炎患者在内镜鼻窦手术后出现活动性鼻窦感染的常见病原体和抗生素耐药性。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。环境:位于佛罗里达州东南部的单一机构鼻科私人诊所。方法:记录2020年8月至2023年12月有症状的脓性引流患者术后内镜引导下的鼻窦培养情况。如果有条件,收集术前或术中培养的生物。结果:125例患者中,女性占50.4%,平均年龄51.0岁。在34.4%接受翻修手术的患者中,76%患有鼻息肉,26.4%患有哮喘。301例培养物中,阳性264例(87.7%),多微生物53例(17.6%),阴性37例(12.3%)。其中革兰氏阴性165株(47%),革兰氏阳性125株(35.6%),真菌14株(4%),厌氧10株(2.8%)。46.9%的术后微生物未术前培养。革兰氏阴性菌包括肠杆菌科(17.7%)、假单胞菌属(10.5%)、沙雷氏菌属(5.1%)。革兰氏阳性菌包括甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA, 17.1%)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA, 8%)。抗生素耐药包括对青霉素类(52.8%)和克林霉素(32.8%)的MSSA,对喹诺酮类(53.6%)和克林霉素(35.7%)的MRSA。肠杆菌科对阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐的耐药率为42%,对青霉素的耐药率为37.1%,而铜绿假单胞菌对喹诺酮类药物的耐药率为17.7%。结论:慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦手术后的队列中革兰氏阴性菌比例较大,葡萄球菌对青霉素和革兰氏阴性阿莫西林-克拉维酸耐药明显。我们的研究结果表明培养具有这种患者表现的患者是有益的。如果不能获得培养,我们建议考虑广泛的革兰氏阴性覆盖和局部抗生素耐药模式的广谱抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbiological Profiles and Patterns of Resistance in Patients With Sinus Infections After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Objective: Identify common pathogens and antibiotic resistances in chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-endoscopic sinus surgery presenting with an active sinus infection.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Single-institution rhinology private practice in Southeast Florida.

Methods: Recorded postoperative endoscopically-guided sinus cultures from symptomatic patients with purulent drainage on endoscopy from August 2020 to December 2023. When available, pre- or intraoperatively cultured organisms were collected.

Results: Of 125 patients, 50.4% were female with a mean age of 51.0. In 34.4% of patients that underwent revision surgery, 76% had nasal polyps and 26.4% had asthma. Of 301 cultures, 264 (87.7%) were positive, 53 (17.6%) were polymicrobial, and 37 (12.3%) were negative. Of 351 total isolates, 165 (47%) were Gram-negative, 125 (35.6%) Gram-positive, 14 (4%) fungi, and 10 (2.8%) anaerobic. 46.9% of postoperative organisms were not cultured preoperatively. Gram-negative bacteria included Enterobacteriaceae (17.7%), Pseudomonas spp. (10.5%), Serratia spp. (5.1%). Gram-positive bacteria included Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, 17.1%) and Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, 8%). Antibiotic resistances included MSSA to penicillins (52.8%) and clindamycin (32.8%), and MRSA resistance to quinolones (53.6%) and clindamycin (35.7%). Enterobacteriaceae were 42% resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 37.1% to penicillins, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 17.7% resistant to quinolones.

Conclusion: A cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-sinus surgery grew a large proportion of Gram-negative organisms and significant Staphylococcal penicillin and Gram-negative amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance. Our findings indicate the benefit of culturing patients with this patient presentation. If cultures cannot be obtained, we suggest broad-spectrum antibiotics that consider wide Gram-negative coverage and local antibiotic resistance patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信