未经治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者Epworth嗜睡量表评分的重测信度。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nature and Science of Sleep Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NSS.S490960
Xujun Feng, Yuan Shi, Ye Zhang, Fei Lei, Rong Ren, Xiangdong Tang
{"title":"未经治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者Epworth嗜睡量表评分的重测信度。","authors":"Xujun Feng, Yuan Shi, Ye Zhang, Fei Lei, Rong Ren, Xiangdong Tang","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S490960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and investigate the effects of different follow-up techniques and various factors on ESS score discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively enrolled participants diagnosed with OSA at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2022 to May 2023. Each participant completed a polysomnography (PSG) and the Chinese version of the ESS. Initial ESS evaluations were performed before the PSG and were reassessed either face-to-face or on telephone within a week. Analysis involved Bland-Altman plots, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and calculation of mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 382 patients with untreated OSA, averaging 43.52 years old, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.54 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and an average apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 47.93 events/hour. The ICC was recorded at 0.820. The signed difference in ESS scores from baseline to follow-up was 1.68 ± 2.93 overall. In OSA patients with a BMI > 28, the difference was 2.39 ± 3.46, while in those with an AHI ≥ 30, it was 1.77 ± 3.27.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significance of repeated ESS testing to improve the reliability of sleepiness evaluations in patients with OSA. Further studies should aim to confirm these findings in a broader demographic and develop refined methods for more precise sleepiness assessments among different OSA groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"16 ","pages":"2299-2309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-Retest Reliability of Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score in Patients with Untreated Obstructive Sleep Apnea.\",\"authors\":\"Xujun Feng, Yuan Shi, Ye Zhang, Fei Lei, Rong Ren, Xiangdong Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/NSS.S490960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and investigate the effects of different follow-up techniques and various factors on ESS score discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively enrolled participants diagnosed with OSA at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2022 to May 2023. Each participant completed a polysomnography (PSG) and the Chinese version of the ESS. Initial ESS evaluations were performed before the PSG and were reassessed either face-to-face or on telephone within a week. Analysis involved Bland-Altman plots, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and calculation of mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 382 patients with untreated OSA, averaging 43.52 years old, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.54 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and an average apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 47.93 events/hour. The ICC was recorded at 0.820. The signed difference in ESS scores from baseline to follow-up was 1.68 ± 2.93 overall. In OSA patients with a BMI > 28, the difference was 2.39 ± 3.46, while in those with an AHI ≥ 30, it was 1.77 ± 3.27.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significance of repeated ESS testing to improve the reliability of sleepiness evaluations in patients with OSA. Further studies should aim to confirm these findings in a broader demographic and develop refined methods for more precise sleepiness assessments among different OSA groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature and Science of Sleep\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"2299-2309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature and Science of Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S490960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S490960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在评估Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)在未经治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者中的重测信度,并探讨不同随访技术和各种因素对ESS评分差异的影响。方法:本研究前瞻性地招募了2022年10月至2023年5月在四川大学华西医院诊断为OSA的参与者。每个参与者都完成了多导睡眠图(PSG)和中文版的ESS。在PSG之前进行初始ESS评估,并在一周内重新进行面对面或电话评估。分析包括Bland-Altman图、类内相关系数(ICC)和平均差异的计算。结果:我们纳入了382例未经治疗的OSA患者,平均年龄43.52岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为26.54 kg/m2,平均呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)为47.93事件/小时。国际商会汇率为0.820。ESS评分从基线到随访的显著差异为1.68±2.93。BMI为bb0 28的OSA患者的差异为2.39±3.46,AHI≥30的OSA患者的差异为1.77±3.27。结论:本研究强调了重复ESS检测对提高OSA患者嗜睡评价可靠性的重要意义。进一步的研究应该致力于在更广泛的人群中证实这些发现,并开发更精确的方法来评估不同OSA群体的嗜睡程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-Retest Reliability of Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score in Patients with Untreated Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Study objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and investigate the effects of different follow-up techniques and various factors on ESS score discrepancies.

Methods: This study prospectively enrolled participants diagnosed with OSA at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2022 to May 2023. Each participant completed a polysomnography (PSG) and the Chinese version of the ESS. Initial ESS evaluations were performed before the PSG and were reassessed either face-to-face or on telephone within a week. Analysis involved Bland-Altman plots, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and calculation of mean differences.

Results: We included 382 patients with untreated OSA, averaging 43.52 years old, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.54 kg/m2 and an average apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 47.93 events/hour. The ICC was recorded at 0.820. The signed difference in ESS scores from baseline to follow-up was 1.68 ± 2.93 overall. In OSA patients with a BMI > 28, the difference was 2.39 ± 3.46, while in those with an AHI ≥ 30, it was 1.77 ± 3.27.

Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of repeated ESS testing to improve the reliability of sleepiness evaluations in patients with OSA. Further studies should aim to confirm these findings in a broader demographic and develop refined methods for more precise sleepiness assessments among different OSA groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature and Science of Sleep
Nature and Science of Sleep Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
245
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep. Specific topics covered in the journal include: The functions of sleep in humans and other animals Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep The genetics of sleep and sleep differences The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness Sleep changes with development and with age Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause) The science and nature of dreams Sleep disorders Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health) The microbiome and sleep Chronotherapy Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信