Vasa previa指南及其支持证据。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Carine McMahon, Shelene Laiu, Yinka Oyelese, Daniel L Rolnik
{"title":"Vasa previa指南及其支持证据。","authors":"Carine McMahon, Shelene Laiu, Yinka Oyelese, Daniel L Rolnik","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasa previa (VP) is a serious pregnancy complication in which fetal vessels, unprotected by the umbilical cord, run across or within close proximity to the internal cervical os, which can potentially result in fetal exsanguination in the event of membrane rupture. There is global consensus that women with antenatally diagnosed VP should have caesarean delivery prior to onset of labour to prevent the catastrophic complications of VP. However, there is variability in the approach to management of these women antenatally, particularly regarding hospitalisation and timing of steroid administration and delivery.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>In this review, we aim to compare the VP guidelines of four prominent obstetric advisory bodies: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) with a particular focus on antenatal hospitalisation, administration of steroids, and timing of birth in asymptomatic patients. We also aim to evaluate the evidence cited to support their recommendations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current guidelines are based on low-quality evidence that often does not include insights from recent studies and are vague in their recommendations for antenatal hospitalisation and timing of delivery.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>More robust evidence for management of VP is needed to inform future guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vasa previa guidelines and their supporting evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Carine McMahon, Shelene Laiu, Yinka Oyelese, Daniel L Rolnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2024-0473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasa previa (VP) is a serious pregnancy complication in which fetal vessels, unprotected by the umbilical cord, run across or within close proximity to the internal cervical os, which can potentially result in fetal exsanguination in the event of membrane rupture. There is global consensus that women with antenatally diagnosed VP should have caesarean delivery prior to onset of labour to prevent the catastrophic complications of VP. However, there is variability in the approach to management of these women antenatally, particularly regarding hospitalisation and timing of steroid administration and delivery.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>In this review, we aim to compare the VP guidelines of four prominent obstetric advisory bodies: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) with a particular focus on antenatal hospitalisation, administration of steroids, and timing of birth in asymptomatic patients. We also aim to evaluate the evidence cited to support their recommendations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current guidelines are based on low-quality evidence that often does not include insights from recent studies and are vague in their recommendations for antenatal hospitalisation and timing of delivery.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>More robust evidence for management of VP is needed to inform future guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0473\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前置血管(VP)是一种严重的妊娠并发症,胎儿血管在脐带的保护下穿过或靠近宫颈内腔,在膜破裂的情况下可能导致胎儿失血。全球一致认为,产前诊断为副总统的妇女应在分娩前进行剖腹产,以防止副总统的灾难性并发症。然而,这些妇女的产前管理方法存在差异,特别是关于住院和类固醇给药和分娩的时间。内容:在这篇综述中,我们的目的是比较四个突出的产科咨询机构的副总统指南:澳大利亚和新西兰皇家妇产科学院(RANZCOG)、皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)、母胎医学学会(SMFM)和加拿大妇产科学会(SOGC),特别关注产前住院、类固醇的使用和无症状患者的分娩时机。我们还旨在评估所引用的证据来支持他们的建议。摘要:目前的指南基于低质量的证据,通常不包括最近研究的见解,并且在产前住院治疗和分娩时间方面的建议含糊不清。展望:需要更有力的VP管理证据来指导未来的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vasa previa guidelines and their supporting evidence.

Introduction: Vasa previa (VP) is a serious pregnancy complication in which fetal vessels, unprotected by the umbilical cord, run across or within close proximity to the internal cervical os, which can potentially result in fetal exsanguination in the event of membrane rupture. There is global consensus that women with antenatally diagnosed VP should have caesarean delivery prior to onset of labour to prevent the catastrophic complications of VP. However, there is variability in the approach to management of these women antenatally, particularly regarding hospitalisation and timing of steroid administration and delivery.

Content: In this review, we aim to compare the VP guidelines of four prominent obstetric advisory bodies: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) with a particular focus on antenatal hospitalisation, administration of steroids, and timing of birth in asymptomatic patients. We also aim to evaluate the evidence cited to support their recommendations.

Summary: Current guidelines are based on low-quality evidence that often does not include insights from recent studies and are vague in their recommendations for antenatal hospitalisation and timing of delivery.

Outlook: More robust evidence for management of VP is needed to inform future guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信