模拟澳大利亚人口的维生素D强化方案。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Eleanor Dunlop , Anita S Lawrence , Belinda Neo , Mairead Kiely , Anna Rangan , Caryl Nowson , Paul Adorno , Paul Atyeo , Edoardo Tescari , Daniel Russo-Batterham , Kim Doyle , Lucinda J Black
{"title":"模拟澳大利亚人口的维生素D强化方案。","authors":"Eleanor Dunlop ,&nbsp;Anita S Lawrence ,&nbsp;Belinda Neo ,&nbsp;Mairead Kiely ,&nbsp;Anna Rangan ,&nbsp;Caryl Nowson ,&nbsp;Paul Adorno ,&nbsp;Paul Atyeo ,&nbsp;Edoardo Tescari ,&nbsp;Daniel Russo-Batterham ,&nbsp;Kim Doyle ,&nbsp;Lucinda J Black","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration &lt;50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8–3.2 <em>μ</em>g/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (<em>n</em> = 12,153 aged 2–85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2–4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 <em>μ</em>g/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 <em>μ</em>g/d).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Under scenarios 1–4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake &lt;10 <em>μ</em>g/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":"155 3","pages":"Pages 890-898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Vitamin D Fortification Scenarios for the Australian Population\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Dunlop ,&nbsp;Anita S Lawrence ,&nbsp;Belinda Neo ,&nbsp;Mairead Kiely ,&nbsp;Anna Rangan ,&nbsp;Caryl Nowson ,&nbsp;Paul Adorno ,&nbsp;Paul Atyeo ,&nbsp;Edoardo Tescari ,&nbsp;Daniel Russo-Batterham ,&nbsp;Kim Doyle ,&nbsp;Lucinda J Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration &lt;50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8–3.2 <em>μ</em>g/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (<em>n</em> = 12,153 aged 2–85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2–4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 <em>μ</em>g/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 <em>μ</em>g/d).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Under scenarios 1–4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake &lt;10 <em>μ</em>g/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"155 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 890-898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316624012598\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316624012598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低维生素D状态(循环25-羟基维生素D浓度)目的:我们模拟了四种维生素D强化方案,以支持澳大利亚有效和安全的强化策略。方法:我们使用2011-2012年全国营养和体育活动调查(n = 12,153 2-85岁)的横断面食品消费数据和分析食品成分数据。情景1模拟了在所有强制强化维生素D的食品(食用油涂抹)或可选食品(乳制品/植物性替代品、配方饮料、允许的即食早餐谷物(RTEBC))中系统地添加最大允许量的维生素D。情景2-4模拟了在食用油涂抹剂和液态奶/替代品中以高于允许的浓度添加维生素D,以及在下列情景中添加最大允许量:情景2)液态奶、配方饮料以外的乳制品/替代品;方案3)方案2加上符合条件的RTEBC;方案4)方案3加上面包(澳大利亚不允许添加维生素D)。我们使用了国家癌症研究所的方法,按性别和年龄组对每种情况下维生素D的通常摄入量进行了建模。采用北美估计平均需取量(EAR, 10 μg/d)和澳大利亚最高摄入量(UL, 80 μg/d)评估膳食充分性和安全性。结果:分别在情景1-4下,澳大利亚人摄入维生素D的预计比例结论:系统的强化策略可以支持整个澳大利亚人口维生素D摄入量的有营养意义的改善。最理想的策略是修改澳大利亚新西兰食品标准法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling Vitamin D Fortification Scenarios for the Australian Population

Background

Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8–3.2 μg/d). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.

Objectives

We modeled 4 vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.

Methods

We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2–85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modeled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals). Scenarios 2–4 modeled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted and the addition of the maximum permitted amount to scenario 2, dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; scenario 3: scenario 2 plus eligible ready-to-eat breakfast cereals; scenario 4: scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model the usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (10 μg/d) and the Australian upper level of intake (80 μg/d).

Results

Under scenarios 1–4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/d was 80%, 84%, 73%, and 60%. No participant exceeded the upper level of intake under any scenario.

Conclusions

A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信