口服药前与可乐定、美托洛尔对功能性鼻窦内窥镜手术手术视野及术中血流动力学的影响。

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Udita Naithani, Priya Verma, Riyaz K Ahamed, Santosh Choudhary, Vandana Gakkhar, Gayatri Deshpande
{"title":"口服药前与可乐定、美托洛尔对功能性鼻窦内窥镜手术手术视野及术中血流动力学的影响。","authors":"Udita Naithani, Priya Verma, Riyaz K Ahamed, Santosh Choudhary, Vandana Gakkhar, Gayatri Deshpande","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_234_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Bloodless surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is an essential part, and research continues to find simple and effective regime for it. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of oral clonidine versus oral metoprolol as premedicants regarding surgical field condition and controlled hypotension in patients undergoing FESS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) I and II aged 18-60 years, of both genders, scheduled for FESS under general anesthesia were randomly allocated in two groups. Group C (<i>n</i> = 34) received oral clonidine 300 μg and group M (<i>n</i> = 34) received oral metoprolol 50 mg, 2 h before surgery. Controlled hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] 65-75 mmHg) was achieved by titrating sevoflurane (1%-3%). Primary outcome measured was surgical field visualization by Average Category Scale (ACS 0-5), and the secondary outcomes measured were hemodynamic parameters, sevoflurane requirement, recovery, and side effects. Categorical, continuous, and ordinal data were compared using Chi-square test, <i>t</i>-test, and Mann-Whitney test, respectively. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACS was significantly less in group C compared to group M up to 60 min, (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and MAP were significantly less in group C compared to group M at all time intervals (<i>P</i> < 0.05) Intraoperative sevoflurane requirement (vol %) was significantly less in group C (1.21 ± 0.42) compared to group M (1.68 ± 0.53) (<i>P</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Premedication with oral clonidine was found to be superior to oral metoprolol as it provided significantly better surgical field condition during FESS with much efficient controlled hypotension and anesthetic-sparing effect.<b>Standardized Study Reporting Requirements:</b> CONSORT: http://www.consort-statement.org/.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"40 4","pages":"659-665"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on surgical field conditions and intraoperative hemodynamics during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Udita Naithani, Priya Verma, Riyaz K Ahamed, Santosh Choudhary, Vandana Gakkhar, Gayatri Deshpande\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_234_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Bloodless surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is an essential part, and research continues to find simple and effective regime for it. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of oral clonidine versus oral metoprolol as premedicants regarding surgical field condition and controlled hypotension in patients undergoing FESS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) I and II aged 18-60 years, of both genders, scheduled for FESS under general anesthesia were randomly allocated in two groups. Group C (<i>n</i> = 34) received oral clonidine 300 μg and group M (<i>n</i> = 34) received oral metoprolol 50 mg, 2 h before surgery. Controlled hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] 65-75 mmHg) was achieved by titrating sevoflurane (1%-3%). Primary outcome measured was surgical field visualization by Average Category Scale (ACS 0-5), and the secondary outcomes measured were hemodynamic parameters, sevoflurane requirement, recovery, and side effects. Categorical, continuous, and ordinal data were compared using Chi-square test, <i>t</i>-test, and Mann-Whitney test, respectively. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACS was significantly less in group C compared to group M up to 60 min, (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and MAP were significantly less in group C compared to group M at all time intervals (<i>P</i> < 0.05) Intraoperative sevoflurane requirement (vol %) was significantly less in group C (1.21 ± 0.42) compared to group M (1.68 ± 0.53) (<i>P</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Premedication with oral clonidine was found to be superior to oral metoprolol as it provided significantly better surgical field condition during FESS with much efficient controlled hypotension and anesthetic-sparing effect.<b>Standardized Study Reporting Requirements:</b> CONSORT: http://www.consort-statement.org/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"659-665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694877/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_234_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_234_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)中,无血手术野是必不可少的一部分,研究不断寻求简单有效的治疗方案。本研究旨在比较口服可乐定与口服美托洛尔作为术前药物对FESS患者手术野条件和控制性低血压的影响。材料与方法:选取美国麻醉学会(ASA)生理状态(PS) I、II级患者68例,年龄18 ~ 60岁,男女均可,在全麻条件下进行FESS。C组(n = 34)术前2 h口服可乐定300 μg, M组(n = 34)术前2 h口服美托洛尔50 mg。通过滴定七氟醚(1%-3%)达到控制低血压(平均动脉压[MAP] 65-75 mmHg)。测量的主要结果是通过平均分类量表(ACS 0-5)观察手术视野,测量的次要结果是血流动力学参数、七氟醚需用量、恢复情况和副作用。分类资料、连续资料和有序资料的比较分别采用卡方检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney检验。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:60 min时,C组ACS明显少于M组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。C组各时间间隔平均收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、MAP均显著低于M组(P < 0.05); C组术中七氟醚需氧量(vol %)(1.21±0.42)显著低于M组(1.68±0.53)(P = 0.000)。结论:术前口服可乐定优于口服美托洛尔,可明显改善FESS术野条件,有效控制低血压和保麻效果。标准化研究报告要求:CONSORT: http://www.consort-statement.org/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on surgical field conditions and intraoperative hemodynamics during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Background and aims: Bloodless surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is an essential part, and research continues to find simple and effective regime for it. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of oral clonidine versus oral metoprolol as premedicants regarding surgical field condition and controlled hypotension in patients undergoing FESS.

Material and methods: Sixty-eight patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) I and II aged 18-60 years, of both genders, scheduled for FESS under general anesthesia were randomly allocated in two groups. Group C (n = 34) received oral clonidine 300 μg and group M (n = 34) received oral metoprolol 50 mg, 2 h before surgery. Controlled hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] 65-75 mmHg) was achieved by titrating sevoflurane (1%-3%). Primary outcome measured was surgical field visualization by Average Category Scale (ACS 0-5), and the secondary outcomes measured were hemodynamic parameters, sevoflurane requirement, recovery, and side effects. Categorical, continuous, and ordinal data were compared using Chi-square test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney test, respectively. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: ACS was significantly less in group C compared to group M up to 60 min, (P < 0.05). Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and MAP were significantly less in group C compared to group M at all time intervals (P < 0.05) Intraoperative sevoflurane requirement (vol %) was significantly less in group C (1.21 ± 0.42) compared to group M (1.68 ± 0.53) (P = 0.000).

Conclusions: Premedication with oral clonidine was found to be superior to oral metoprolol as it provided significantly better surgical field condition during FESS with much efficient controlled hypotension and anesthetic-sparing effect.Standardized Study Reporting Requirements: CONSORT: http://www.consort-statement.org/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信