电子烟戒烟试验中戒烟的纵向模式:对系统综述数据的二次分析,并进行荟萃分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Jazmine Chan, Eliza Zhitnik, Francesca Pesola, Peter Hajek, Nicola Lindson
{"title":"电子烟戒烟试验中戒烟的纵向模式:对系统综述数据的二次分析,并进行荟萃分析。","authors":"Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Jazmine Chan, Eliza Zhitnik, Francesca Pesola, Peter Hajek, Nicola Lindson","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We set out to better understand patterns of smoking abstinence and relapse in trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of studies from a Cochrane review. Studies had to test any type of e-cigarette intervention for smoking cessation. They had to follow-up for at least 6 months and report either: abstinence at multiple time points; abstinence using multiple definitions; relapse. We narratively synthesized data and conducted meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 15 studies (n=7,233 participants). Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool v1, 5 were judged to be at high risk of bias, 8 were at low risk, and 2 at unclear risk. Absolute continuous abstinence rates tended to decline over time, but varying slopes. For absolute point prevalence abstinence, three studies demonstrated a shallow decline over time, two a steep decline, and three the opposite - an increase in abstinence over time. Data on relative abstinence rates (e-cigarettes versus control) were mixed. There were multiple instances of differences between point prevalence and continuous/sustained abstinence rates, both in trajectories over time and in terms of relative abstinence. The few studies addressing relapse highlighted mixed demographic and behavioural characteristics associated with relapse rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking trajectories vary between trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Risk ratios may not be stable over time and may increase or decrease in favor of e-cigarettes depending on the study. Further data are needed, especially on relapse rates in early quitters who use e-cigarettes versus those who use other or no stop-smoking aids.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>While some have posited e-cigarettes might increase smoking relapse when used as a cessation tool, others have posited that combustible cigarette quit rates may increase over time in the same studies due to 'accidental quitting'. We set out to investigate this empirically and found considerable variation in smoking trajectories in e-cigarette trials. Data suggest risk ratios may not be stable over time and may increase or decrease in favor of e-cigarettes depending on the study. Further data are needed, especially on relapse rates in early quitters who use e-cigarettes versus those who use other or no stop-smoking aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal patterns in smoking abstinence in trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation: secondary analysis of data from a systematic review, with meta-analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Jazmine Chan, Eliza Zhitnik, Francesca Pesola, Peter Hajek, Nicola Lindson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We set out to better understand patterns of smoking abstinence and relapse in trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of studies from a Cochrane review. Studies had to test any type of e-cigarette intervention for smoking cessation. They had to follow-up for at least 6 months and report either: abstinence at multiple time points; abstinence using multiple definitions; relapse. We narratively synthesized data and conducted meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 15 studies (n=7,233 participants). Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool v1, 5 were judged to be at high risk of bias, 8 were at low risk, and 2 at unclear risk. Absolute continuous abstinence rates tended to decline over time, but varying slopes. For absolute point prevalence abstinence, three studies demonstrated a shallow decline over time, two a steep decline, and three the opposite - an increase in abstinence over time. Data on relative abstinence rates (e-cigarettes versus control) were mixed. There were multiple instances of differences between point prevalence and continuous/sustained abstinence rates, both in trajectories over time and in terms of relative abstinence. The few studies addressing relapse highlighted mixed demographic and behavioural characteristics associated with relapse rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking trajectories vary between trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Risk ratios may not be stable over time and may increase or decrease in favor of e-cigarettes depending on the study. Further data are needed, especially on relapse rates in early quitters who use e-cigarettes versus those who use other or no stop-smoking aids.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>While some have posited e-cigarettes might increase smoking relapse when used as a cessation tool, others have posited that combustible cigarette quit rates may increase over time in the same studies due to 'accidental quitting'. We set out to investigate this empirically and found considerable variation in smoking trajectories in e-cigarette trials. Data suggest risk ratios may not be stable over time and may increase or decrease in favor of e-cigarettes depending on the study. Further data are needed, especially on relapse rates in early quitters who use e-cigarettes versus those who use other or no stop-smoking aids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae313\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:我们在电子烟戒烟试验中更好地了解戒烟和复发的模式。方法:对Cochrane综述中的研究进行二次分析。研究必须测试任何类型的电子烟戒烟干预措施。他们必须随访至少6个月,并报告:在多个时间点禁欲;多重定义的禁欲;复发。我们叙述性地综合了数据并进行了meta分析。结果:我们纳入了15项研究(n= 7233名受试者)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具v1, 5例被判定为高偏倚风险,8例为低风险,2例风险不明确。绝对连续戒断率随时间的推移呈下降趋势,但有不同的斜率。对于绝对流行的禁欲,三个研究表明随着时间的推移有轻微的下降,两个急剧下降,三个相反-随着时间的推移禁欲增加。有关相对戒断率(电子烟与对照组)的数据喜忧参半。点流行率和连续/持续戒断率之间存在多种差异,无论是在时间轨迹上还是在相对戒断方面。少数关于复发的研究强调了与复发率相关的混合人口统计学和行为特征。结论:电子烟戒烟试验的吸烟轨迹各不相同。风险比可能不会随着时间的推移而稳定,并可能根据研究结果增加或减少对电子烟的影响。需要进一步的数据,特别是关于使用电子烟的早期戒烟者与使用其他或不使用戒烟辅助工具的早期戒烟者的复发率。启示:虽然一些人认为电子烟作为戒烟工具可能会增加吸烟复发,但另一些人认为,在相同的研究中,由于“意外戒烟”,可燃香烟的戒烟率可能会随着时间的推移而增加。我们着手对此进行实证调查,发现在电子烟试验中,吸烟轨迹存在相当大的差异。数据显示,随着时间的推移,风险比可能不稳定,可能会根据研究结果增加或减少电子烟。需要进一步的数据,特别是关于使用电子烟的早期戒烟者与使用其他或不使用戒烟辅助工具的早期戒烟者的复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal patterns in smoking abstinence in trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation: secondary analysis of data from a systematic review, with meta-analyses.

Introduction: We set out to better understand patterns of smoking abstinence and relapse in trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Methods: Secondary analysis of studies from a Cochrane review. Studies had to test any type of e-cigarette intervention for smoking cessation. They had to follow-up for at least 6 months and report either: abstinence at multiple time points; abstinence using multiple definitions; relapse. We narratively synthesized data and conducted meta-analyses.

Results: We included 15 studies (n=7,233 participants). Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool v1, 5 were judged to be at high risk of bias, 8 were at low risk, and 2 at unclear risk. Absolute continuous abstinence rates tended to decline over time, but varying slopes. For absolute point prevalence abstinence, three studies demonstrated a shallow decline over time, two a steep decline, and three the opposite - an increase in abstinence over time. Data on relative abstinence rates (e-cigarettes versus control) were mixed. There were multiple instances of differences between point prevalence and continuous/sustained abstinence rates, both in trajectories over time and in terms of relative abstinence. The few studies addressing relapse highlighted mixed demographic and behavioural characteristics associated with relapse rates.

Conclusions: Smoking trajectories vary between trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. Risk ratios may not be stable over time and may increase or decrease in favor of e-cigarettes depending on the study. Further data are needed, especially on relapse rates in early quitters who use e-cigarettes versus those who use other or no stop-smoking aids.

Implications: While some have posited e-cigarettes might increase smoking relapse when used as a cessation tool, others have posited that combustible cigarette quit rates may increase over time in the same studies due to 'accidental quitting'. We set out to investigate this empirically and found considerable variation in smoking trajectories in e-cigarette trials. Data suggest risk ratios may not be stable over time and may increase or decrease in favor of e-cigarettes depending on the study. Further data are needed, especially on relapse rates in early quitters who use e-cigarettes versus those who use other or no stop-smoking aids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信