II类错牙合治疗中骨锚定抗疲劳装置对骨骼和牙齿的影响:荟萃分析和系统回顾。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_13_24
Osama Eissa, Samira Diar-Bakirly, Humam Saltaji, Tarek El-Bialy
{"title":"II类错牙合治疗中骨锚定抗疲劳装置对骨骼和牙齿的影响:荟萃分析和系统回顾。","authors":"Osama Eissa, Samira Diar-Bakirly, Humam Saltaji, Tarek El-Bialy","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_13_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental treatment effects of Class II malocclusion cases using skeletally anchored Forsus (miniscrew-anchored FRD or miniplate-anchored FRD), with conventional Forsus FRD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Unrestricted electronic search of six databases and additional manual searches were performed up to July 2023. Randomized controlled trials having one treatment arm with skeletal anchored Forsus FRD in treatment of Class II malocclusion and another matched treatment group treated with conventional Forsus FRD were included in this review. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool. No restrictions were set concerning treatment duration, or the cephalometric analysis used. Skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes data were extracted by two authors independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies using miniscrews as means of skeletal anchorage were evaluated and qualified for the final review and meta-analysis. Three other studies using miniplates were considered in the systematic review but were not qualified for a meta-analysis. The data gathered from the miniscrews anchored FRD papers included a total of 93 Class II patients (46 treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD, 47 treated with conventional Forsus FRD). The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the SNA angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: -0.26, CI: -0.50 to -0.02), a nonsignificant difference in the SNB (mean difference: 0.17, CI: -0.06 to 0.39), a statistically significant increase in the SN-MP angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: 0.53, CI: 0.06-1.00)-a statistically significant reduction in the L1-MP angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: -2.12, CI: -4.96 to -2.12). Data from miniplate-anchored FRD included 31 Class II patients treated with mini plate anchored FRD. Although meta-analysis was not applicable to these studies, lower incisor inclination was observed to be less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the existing evidence, the use of skeletal anchorage could not enhance forward mandibular growth. However, miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD could minimize mandibular incisor protrusion while miniplates could even retract the mandibular incisor position with a headgear effect on the maxilla.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal and dental effects of skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant devices during class II malocclusion treatment: A meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Osama Eissa, Samira Diar-Bakirly, Humam Saltaji, Tarek El-Bialy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_13_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental treatment effects of Class II malocclusion cases using skeletally anchored Forsus (miniscrew-anchored FRD or miniplate-anchored FRD), with conventional Forsus FRD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Unrestricted electronic search of six databases and additional manual searches were performed up to July 2023. Randomized controlled trials having one treatment arm with skeletal anchored Forsus FRD in treatment of Class II malocclusion and another matched treatment group treated with conventional Forsus FRD were included in this review. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool. No restrictions were set concerning treatment duration, or the cephalometric analysis used. Skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes data were extracted by two authors independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies using miniscrews as means of skeletal anchorage were evaluated and qualified for the final review and meta-analysis. Three other studies using miniplates were considered in the systematic review but were not qualified for a meta-analysis. The data gathered from the miniscrews anchored FRD papers included a total of 93 Class II patients (46 treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD, 47 treated with conventional Forsus FRD). The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the SNA angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: -0.26, CI: -0.50 to -0.02), a nonsignificant difference in the SNB (mean difference: 0.17, CI: -0.06 to 0.39), a statistically significant increase in the SN-MP angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: 0.53, CI: 0.06-1.00)-a statistically significant reduction in the L1-MP angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: -2.12, CI: -4.96 to -2.12). Data from miniplate-anchored FRD included 31 Class II patients treated with mini plate anchored FRD. Although meta-analysis was not applicable to these studies, lower incisor inclination was observed to be less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the existing evidence, the use of skeletal anchorage could not enhance forward mandibular growth. However, miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD could minimize mandibular incisor protrusion while miniplates could even retract the mandibular incisor position with a headgear effect on the maxilla.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_13_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_13_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较骨锚定Forsus(微型螺钉锚定FRD或微型钢板锚定FRD)与常规Forsus FRD治疗II类错颌的骨、牙疗效。材料和方法:截至2023年7月,对6个数据库进行了不受限制的电子检索和额外的人工检索。本综述纳入了随机对照试验,其中一个治疗组使用骨锚定Forsus FRD治疗II类错颌,另一个匹配的治疗组使用常规Forsus FRD治疗。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具进行偏倚风险评估。治疗时间和使用的头颅测量分析没有限制。骨骼和牙槽牙结局数据由两位作者独立提取。结果:三个使用微型螺钉作为骨骼锚固手段的研究被评估,并有资格进行最终的回顾和荟萃分析。另外三个使用微型钢板的研究在系统评价中被考虑,但没有资格进行荟萃分析。从微型螺钉锚定FRD论文中收集的数据共包括93例II级患者(46例接受微型螺钉锚定Forsus FRD治疗,47例接受常规Forsus FRD治疗)。meta分析显示,有利于微型螺钉锚定Forsus FRD的SNA角减少具有统计学意义(平均差异:-0.26,CI: -0.50至-0.02),SNB差异无统计学意义(平均差异:0.17,CI: -0.06至0.39),有利于微型螺钉锚定Forsus FRD的SN-MP角增加具有统计学意义(平均差异:0.53,CI:0.06-1.00)-统计学上显著降低L1-MP角度,有利于微型螺钉锚定的Forsus FRD(平均差异:-2.12,CI: -4.96至-2.12)。小型钢板锚定FRD的数据包括31例接受小型钢板锚定FRD治疗的II级患者。虽然荟萃分析不适用于这些研究,但观察到下门牙倾斜较少。结论:根据现有证据,骨支抗不能促进下颌前突生长。然而,微型螺钉锚定Forsus FRD可以减少下颌切牙的突出,而微型钢板甚至可以收缩下颌切牙的位置,对上颌骨产生头套效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skeletal and dental effects of skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant devices during class II malocclusion treatment: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Objective: To evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental treatment effects of Class II malocclusion cases using skeletally anchored Forsus (miniscrew-anchored FRD or miniplate-anchored FRD), with conventional Forsus FRD.

Materials and methods: Unrestricted electronic search of six databases and additional manual searches were performed up to July 2023. Randomized controlled trials having one treatment arm with skeletal anchored Forsus FRD in treatment of Class II malocclusion and another matched treatment group treated with conventional Forsus FRD were included in this review. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool. No restrictions were set concerning treatment duration, or the cephalometric analysis used. Skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes data were extracted by two authors independently.

Results: Three studies using miniscrews as means of skeletal anchorage were evaluated and qualified for the final review and meta-analysis. Three other studies using miniplates were considered in the systematic review but were not qualified for a meta-analysis. The data gathered from the miniscrews anchored FRD papers included a total of 93 Class II patients (46 treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD, 47 treated with conventional Forsus FRD). The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the SNA angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: -0.26, CI: -0.50 to -0.02), a nonsignificant difference in the SNB (mean difference: 0.17, CI: -0.06 to 0.39), a statistically significant increase in the SN-MP angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: 0.53, CI: 0.06-1.00)-a statistically significant reduction in the L1-MP angle in favor of miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD (mean difference: -2.12, CI: -4.96 to -2.12). Data from miniplate-anchored FRD included 31 Class II patients treated with mini plate anchored FRD. Although meta-analysis was not applicable to these studies, lower incisor inclination was observed to be less.

Conclusions: Based on the existing evidence, the use of skeletal anchorage could not enhance forward mandibular growth. However, miniscrew-anchored Forsus FRD could minimize mandibular incisor protrusion while miniplates could even retract the mandibular incisor position with a headgear effect on the maxilla.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信