预测直肠癌的治疗反应和生存:来自18个FDG-PET/MRI新辅助治疗的见解。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Valentina Ferri, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave, Pablo Ruiz, Luca Ballelli, Alessandro Broglio, Lina Garcia Cañamaque, Andrea Verdu Segui, Virginia Perez Dueñas, Riccardo Caruso
{"title":"预测直肠癌的治疗反应和生存:来自18个FDG-PET/MRI新辅助治疗的见解。","authors":"Valentina Ferri, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave, Pablo Ruiz, Luca Ballelli, Alessandro Broglio, Lina Garcia Cañamaque, Andrea Verdu Segui, Virginia Perez Dueñas, Riccardo Caruso","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04803-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate identification of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is essential. 18-FDG PET/MRI provides metabolic information that complements the morphological assessment of standard MRI, potentially enhancing the differentiation between fibrotic and tumorous tissues post-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of 18-FDG PET/MRI in assessing treatment response compared to standard MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted at HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, from 2018 to 2021. Patients with LARC undergoing RCT were included and staged at diagnosis and restaged 8-12 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment using 18-FDG PET/MRI. The primary outcome was to compare the performance of PET/MRI and standard MRI in detecting pCR and tumor regression grade (TRG) confirmed via histopathological examination. Quantitative analysis assessed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV). A secondary outcome included survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis for radiological and pathological prognostic markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33 patients, pCR was observed in 45% (14/33). PET/MRI demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 0.88, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively, for detecting pCR, compared to 0.82, 0.50, and 0.67 for standard MRI (p < 0.001). PET/MRI accurately identified TRG stages in 72% of cases, compared to 50% for standard MRI. Post-SUV, post-ADC, and delta-ADC were the most precise PET/MRI predictors for pCR, with AUC values of 0.81, 0.75, and 0.55, respectively. Patients with mrEMVI and mrTRG showed worse disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>18-FDG PET/MRI emerges as a promising imaging tool for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, with superior diagnostic accuracy compared to standard MRI. Radiological findings, such as EMVI, can identify high-risk patients, offering valuable prognostic insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting treatment response and survival in rectal cancer: insights from 18 FDG-PET/MRI post-neoadjuvant therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Ferri, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave, Pablo Ruiz, Luca Ballelli, Alessandro Broglio, Lina Garcia Cañamaque, Andrea Verdu Segui, Virginia Perez Dueñas, Riccardo Caruso\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-024-04803-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate identification of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is essential. 18-FDG PET/MRI provides metabolic information that complements the morphological assessment of standard MRI, potentially enhancing the differentiation between fibrotic and tumorous tissues post-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of 18-FDG PET/MRI in assessing treatment response compared to standard MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted at HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, from 2018 to 2021. Patients with LARC undergoing RCT were included and staged at diagnosis and restaged 8-12 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment using 18-FDG PET/MRI. The primary outcome was to compare the performance of PET/MRI and standard MRI in detecting pCR and tumor regression grade (TRG) confirmed via histopathological examination. Quantitative analysis assessed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV). A secondary outcome included survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis for radiological and pathological prognostic markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33 patients, pCR was observed in 45% (14/33). PET/MRI demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 0.88, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively, for detecting pCR, compared to 0.82, 0.50, and 0.67 for standard MRI (p < 0.001). PET/MRI accurately identified TRG stages in 72% of cases, compared to 50% for standard MRI. Post-SUV, post-ADC, and delta-ADC were the most precise PET/MRI predictors for pCR, with AUC values of 0.81, 0.75, and 0.55, respectively. Patients with mrEMVI and mrTRG showed worse disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>18-FDG PET/MRI emerges as a promising imaging tool for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, with superior diagnostic accuracy compared to standard MRI. Radiological findings, such as EMVI, can identify high-risk patients, offering valuable prognostic insights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04803-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04803-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:准确识别局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)新辅助放化疗(RCT)后患者的病理完全缓解(pCR)是至关重要的。18-FDG PET/MRI提供代谢信息,补充了标准MRI的形态学评估,潜在地增强了治疗后纤维化组织和肿瘤组织的区分。本研究旨在评价18-FDG PET/MRI与标准MRI相比在评估治疗反应方面的表现。材料和方法:一项前瞻性研究于2018年至2021年在马德里的HM Sanchinarro大学医院进行。接受RCT的LARC患者在诊断时进行分期,并在新辅助治疗后8-12周使用18-FDG PET/MRI进行再分期。主要结果是比较PET/MRI和标准MRI在检测组织病理学检查证实的pCR和肿瘤消退等级(TRG)方面的表现。定量分析评估表观扩散系数(ADC)和标准化吸收值(SUV)。次要结局包括使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,并对放射学和病理预后标志物进行Cox回归分析。结果:33例患者中有45%(14/33)出现pCR。PET/MRI检测pCR的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为0.88、0.80和0.84,而标准MRI检测pCR的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为0.82、0.50和0.67 (p)结论:18-FDG PET/MRI作为预测直肠癌新辅助治疗反应的一种有前景的成像工具,与标准MRI相比具有更高的诊断准确性。放射检查结果,如EMVI,可以识别高危患者,提供有价值的预后见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting treatment response and survival in rectal cancer: insights from 18 FDG-PET/MRI post-neoadjuvant therapy.

Introduction: Accurate identification of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is essential. 18-FDG PET/MRI provides metabolic information that complements the morphological assessment of standard MRI, potentially enhancing the differentiation between fibrotic and tumorous tissues post-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of 18-FDG PET/MRI in assessing treatment response compared to standard MRI.

Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted at HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, from 2018 to 2021. Patients with LARC undergoing RCT were included and staged at diagnosis and restaged 8-12 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment using 18-FDG PET/MRI. The primary outcome was to compare the performance of PET/MRI and standard MRI in detecting pCR and tumor regression grade (TRG) confirmed via histopathological examination. Quantitative analysis assessed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV). A secondary outcome included survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis for radiological and pathological prognostic markers.

Results: Among 33 patients, pCR was observed in 45% (14/33). PET/MRI demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 0.88, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively, for detecting pCR, compared to 0.82, 0.50, and 0.67 for standard MRI (p < 0.001). PET/MRI accurately identified TRG stages in 72% of cases, compared to 50% for standard MRI. Post-SUV, post-ADC, and delta-ADC were the most precise PET/MRI predictors for pCR, with AUC values of 0.81, 0.75, and 0.55, respectively. Patients with mrEMVI and mrTRG showed worse disease-free survival (DFS).

Conclusion: 18-FDG PET/MRI emerges as a promising imaging tool for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, with superior diagnostic accuracy compared to standard MRI. Radiological findings, such as EMVI, can identify high-risk patients, offering valuable prognostic insights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信