{"title":"急性A型主动脉夹层ECMO的早期和中期预后。","authors":"Qingqing Meng, Hongkai Jiang, Tianbao Li, Shanwen Pang, Chengbin Zhou, Huanlei Huang, Tucheng Sun, Jinlin Wu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) poses significant challenges in cardiovascular management due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is a severe complication following ATAAD repair that complicates postoperative recovery. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a potential life-saving intervention in this context, yet the specific outcomes related to ECMO in ATAAD patients remain insufficiently studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study reviewed the medical records of 479 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery from September 2017 to June 2021. Patients were stratified into those requiring postoperative ECMO support and those who did not. Data collected included demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the cohort, 19 patients (4.0%) required ECMO support. The ECMO group exhibited significantly higher mortality rates (57.9% vs. 5.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and increased complications, including a higher rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (84.2% vs. 24.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and prolonged ICU stays (14.5 days vs. 7.6 days, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Survival analysis demonstrated a stark contrast in 3-year survival rates, with 36.8% for the ECMO group vs. 92.8% for non-ECMO patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECMO can be a crucial intervention for ATAAD patients suffering from PCS; however, it is associated with significantly higher mortality and complications. Despite lower long-term survival rates compared to non-ECMO patients, ECMO may offer a survival benefit as a salvage therapy. Interpretation is limited by the retrospective single-center design, small ECMO cohort size, and lack of post-discharge quality-of-life data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1509479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The early and mid-term outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection patients with ECMO.\",\"authors\":\"Qingqing Meng, Hongkai Jiang, Tianbao Li, Shanwen Pang, Chengbin Zhou, Huanlei Huang, Tucheng Sun, Jinlin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) poses significant challenges in cardiovascular management due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is a severe complication following ATAAD repair that complicates postoperative recovery. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a potential life-saving intervention in this context, yet the specific outcomes related to ECMO in ATAAD patients remain insufficiently studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study reviewed the medical records of 479 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery from September 2017 to June 2021. Patients were stratified into those requiring postoperative ECMO support and those who did not. Data collected included demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the cohort, 19 patients (4.0%) required ECMO support. The ECMO group exhibited significantly higher mortality rates (57.9% vs. 5.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and increased complications, including a higher rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (84.2% vs. 24.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and prolonged ICU stays (14.5 days vs. 7.6 days, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Survival analysis demonstrated a stark contrast in 3-year survival rates, with 36.8% for the ECMO group vs. 92.8% for non-ECMO patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECMO can be a crucial intervention for ATAAD patients suffering from PCS; however, it is associated with significantly higher mortality and complications. Despite lower long-term survival rates compared to non-ECMO patients, ECMO may offer a survival benefit as a salvage therapy. Interpretation is limited by the retrospective single-center design, small ECMO cohort size, and lack of post-discharge quality-of-life data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1509479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)由于其高发病率和死亡率,对心血管疾病的管理提出了重大挑战。心脏切开术后心源性休克(PCS)是ATAAD修复后的严重并发症,使术后恢复复杂化。在这种情况下,体外膜氧合(ECMO)已成为一种潜在的挽救生命的干预措施,但与ATAAD患者的ECMO相关的具体结果仍未得到充分研究。方法:本回顾性单中心研究回顾了2017年9月至2021年6月期间接受ATAAD手术的479例患者的病历。患者被分为需要术后ECMO支持和不需要的两组。收集的数据包括人口统计学、手术细节和术后结果。结果:在队列中,19例(4.0%)患者需要ECMO支持。ECMO组的死亡率明显高于对照组(57.9% vs. 5.4%, p p p = 0.009)。生存分析显示3年生存率形成鲜明对比,ECMO组为36.8%,而非ECMO组为92.8% (p结论:ECMO可以是ATAAD患者的关键干预措施;然而,它与更高的死亡率和并发症相关。尽管与非ECMO患者相比,ECMO的长期生存率较低,但作为一种挽救性治疗,ECMO可能会提供生存益处。由于回顾性单中心设计、ECMO队列规模小以及缺乏出院后生活质量数据,解释受到限制。
The early and mid-term outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection patients with ECMO.
Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) poses significant challenges in cardiovascular management due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is a severe complication following ATAAD repair that complicates postoperative recovery. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a potential life-saving intervention in this context, yet the specific outcomes related to ECMO in ATAAD patients remain insufficiently studied.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study reviewed the medical records of 479 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery from September 2017 to June 2021. Patients were stratified into those requiring postoperative ECMO support and those who did not. Data collected included demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.
Results: Of the cohort, 19 patients (4.0%) required ECMO support. The ECMO group exhibited significantly higher mortality rates (57.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001) and increased complications, including a higher rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (84.2% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.001) and prolonged ICU stays (14.5 days vs. 7.6 days, p = 0.009). Survival analysis demonstrated a stark contrast in 3-year survival rates, with 36.8% for the ECMO group vs. 92.8% for non-ECMO patients (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: ECMO can be a crucial intervention for ATAAD patients suffering from PCS; however, it is associated with significantly higher mortality and complications. Despite lower long-term survival rates compared to non-ECMO patients, ECMO may offer a survival benefit as a salvage therapy. Interpretation is limited by the retrospective single-center design, small ECMO cohort size, and lack of post-discharge quality-of-life data.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.