在安全的肝胰十二指肠大部切除术中,未来肝残余的最小比例。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kentaro Umemura, Akira Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Notake, Koji Kubota, Kiyotaka Hosoda, Koya Yasukawa, Atsushi Kamachi, Takamune Goto, Hidenori Tomida, Yuji Soejima
{"title":"在安全的肝胰十二指肠大部切除术中,未来肝残余的最小比例。","authors":"Kentaro Umemura,&nbsp;Akira Shimizu,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Notake,&nbsp;Koji Kubota,&nbsp;Kiyotaka Hosoda,&nbsp;Koya Yasukawa,&nbsp;Atsushi Kamachi,&nbsp;Takamune Goto,&nbsp;Hidenori Tomida,&nbsp;Yuji Soejima","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a challenge to overcome. However, the appropriate target proportion of the future liver remnant (pFLR) to prevent severe PHLF in major HPD remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the minimum pFLR required for safe major HPD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study involved 48 major HPD patients. We assessed pFLR and remnant liver function scores (pFLR × albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] / albumin-indocyanine green evaluation [ALICE]/plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green [KICG]) as predictors for Grade B/C PHLF and established safety criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Grade B/C PHLF occurred in 40% of the patients (<i>n</i> = 19), leading to severe morbidity and two in-hospital deaths. pFLR was a good predictor of Grade B/C PHLF [area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01] with a 45% optimal cutoff. While all remnant liver function scores predicted PHLF, the remnant ALICE demonstrated the best predictability (AUC 0.85, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), with the sensitivity and specificity at 89% and 83%, respectively, using −0.86 as the cutoff. Independent risk factors for Grade B/C PHLF were remnant ALICE ≥−0.86 and blood loss ≥1500 mL. Grade B/C PHLF developed in 14% with pFLR ≥45% but reached 64% with pFLR &lt;45%. However, the rate could be reduced to 33% with remnant ALICE &lt;−0.86.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>To prevent Grade B/C PHLF, a pFLR ≥45% is recommended. Nevertheless, major HPD may be considered in patients with good remnant liver function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"188-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum proportion of future liver remnant in safe major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Umemura,&nbsp;Akira Shimizu,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Notake,&nbsp;Koji Kubota,&nbsp;Kiyotaka Hosoda,&nbsp;Koya Yasukawa,&nbsp;Atsushi Kamachi,&nbsp;Takamune Goto,&nbsp;Hidenori Tomida,&nbsp;Yuji Soejima\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ags3.12850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a challenge to overcome. However, the appropriate target proportion of the future liver remnant (pFLR) to prevent severe PHLF in major HPD remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the minimum pFLR required for safe major HPD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study involved 48 major HPD patients. We assessed pFLR and remnant liver function scores (pFLR × albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] / albumin-indocyanine green evaluation [ALICE]/plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green [KICG]) as predictors for Grade B/C PHLF and established safety criteria.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Grade B/C PHLF occurred in 40% of the patients (<i>n</i> = 19), leading to severe morbidity and two in-hospital deaths. pFLR was a good predictor of Grade B/C PHLF [area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01] with a 45% optimal cutoff. While all remnant liver function scores predicted PHLF, the remnant ALICE demonstrated the best predictability (AUC 0.85, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), with the sensitivity and specificity at 89% and 83%, respectively, using −0.86 as the cutoff. Independent risk factors for Grade B/C PHLF were remnant ALICE ≥−0.86 and blood loss ≥1500 mL. Grade B/C PHLF developed in 14% with pFLR ≥45% but reached 64% with pFLR &lt;45%. However, the rate could be reduced to 33% with remnant ALICE &lt;−0.86.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>To prevent Grade B/C PHLF, a pFLR ≥45% is recommended. Nevertheless, major HPD may be considered in patients with good remnant liver function.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"188-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:肝切除术后肝胰十二指肠切除术(HPD)后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)是一个需要克服的挑战。然而,未来肝残体(pFLR)预防重度HPD患者严重PHLF的适当目标比例仍不确定。本研究旨在确定安全重度HPD所需的最小pFLR。方法:对48例HPD患者进行回顾性研究。我们评估了pFLR和剩余肝功能评分(pFLR ×白蛋白胆红素[ALBI] /白蛋白吲哚菁绿评价[ALICE]/血浆吲哚菁绿清除率[KICG])作为B级/C级PHLF的预测指标,并建立了安全标准。结果:40%的患者(n = 19)发生B/C级PHLF,导致严重发病率和2例院内死亡。pFLR是B/C级PHLF的良好预测指标[曲线下面积(AUC) 0.80, p p]结论:为预防B/C级PHLF,建议pFLR≥45%。然而,在残肝功能良好的患者中,可考虑重度HPD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimum proportion of future liver remnant in safe major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy

Background and Aim

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a challenge to overcome. However, the appropriate target proportion of the future liver remnant (pFLR) to prevent severe PHLF in major HPD remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the minimum pFLR required for safe major HPD.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 48 major HPD patients. We assessed pFLR and remnant liver function scores (pFLR × albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] / albumin-indocyanine green evaluation [ALICE]/plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green [KICG]) as predictors for Grade B/C PHLF and established safety criteria.

Results

Grade B/C PHLF occurred in 40% of the patients (n = 19), leading to severe morbidity and two in-hospital deaths. pFLR was a good predictor of Grade B/C PHLF [area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, p < 0.01] with a 45% optimal cutoff. While all remnant liver function scores predicted PHLF, the remnant ALICE demonstrated the best predictability (AUC 0.85, p < 0.01), with the sensitivity and specificity at 89% and 83%, respectively, using −0.86 as the cutoff. Independent risk factors for Grade B/C PHLF were remnant ALICE ≥−0.86 and blood loss ≥1500 mL. Grade B/C PHLF developed in 14% with pFLR ≥45% but reached 64% with pFLR <45%. However, the rate could be reduced to 33% with remnant ALICE <−0.86.

Conclusion

To prevent Grade B/C PHLF, a pFLR ≥45% is recommended. Nevertheless, major HPD may be considered in patients with good remnant liver function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信