Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, Soo Yeun Lim, HyeJeong Jeong, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Hongbeom Kim
{"title":"现代新辅助治疗时代胰腺癌患者ypTNM分期的预后准确性。","authors":"Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, Soo Yeun Lim, HyeJeong Jeong, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Hongbeom Kim","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16792-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging manual, which provided ypTNM for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), has not been comparatively assessed against pTNM for prognosis in pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to compare the prognosis between ypTNM and pTNM stages.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Clinicopathological data from 586 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery at a tertiary center between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed to compare survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages and identify prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 541 patients (100 ypTNM, 441 pTNM). Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed among patients stratified by TNM stage (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in OS was found between the ypTNM and pTNM groups (2-year survival rate (YSR): 76.8% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.094). Subgroup analysis by stage I (82.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.577) and II (68.8% vs. 61.6%, p = 0.715), and III (53.0% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.596) revealed similar survival rates. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with OS: age > 65 years (HR 1.763, p < 0.001), CA19-9 > 150 U/mL (HR 1.439, p = 0.014), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 1.405, p = 0.029), pathologic T2 stage (HR 1.961, p = 0.004) and T3/4 stage (HR 2.830, p < 0.001) versus T0/1 stage, lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.220, p < 0.001), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.251, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms comparable survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer, affirming the applicability of the TNM staging system after NAT. The results highlight the utility of TNM staging in guiding therapeutic decisions for patients undergoing NAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Accuracy of ypTNM Stage in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Modern Neoadjuvant Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, Soo Yeun Lim, HyeJeong Jeong, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Hongbeom Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-024-16792-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging manual, which provided ypTNM for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), has not been comparatively assessed against pTNM for prognosis in pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to compare the prognosis between ypTNM and pTNM stages.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Clinicopathological data from 586 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery at a tertiary center between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed to compare survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages and identify prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 541 patients (100 ypTNM, 441 pTNM). Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed among patients stratified by TNM stage (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in OS was found between the ypTNM and pTNM groups (2-year survival rate (YSR): 76.8% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.094). Subgroup analysis by stage I (82.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.577) and II (68.8% vs. 61.6%, p = 0.715), and III (53.0% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.596) revealed similar survival rates. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with OS: age > 65 years (HR 1.763, p < 0.001), CA19-9 > 150 U/mL (HR 1.439, p = 0.014), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 1.405, p = 0.029), pathologic T2 stage (HR 1.961, p = 0.004) and T3/4 stage (HR 2.830, p < 0.001) versus T0/1 stage, lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.220, p < 0.001), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.251, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms comparable survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer, affirming the applicability of the TNM staging system after NAT. The results highlight the utility of TNM staging in guiding therapeutic decisions for patients undergoing NAT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16792-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16792-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版TNM分期手册为接受新辅助治疗(NAT)的患者提供了ypTNM,但尚未对pTNM与胰腺癌预后进行比较评估。本研究旨在比较ypTNM和pTNM分期的预后。患者和方法:分析2018年至2022年在三级中心接受胰腺癌手术的586例患者的临床病理数据,比较ypTNM和pTNM分期的生存结果,并确定预后因素。结果:共纳入541例患者,其中ypTNM 100例,pTNM 441例。TNM分期(p 65年(HR 1.763, p 150 U/mL) (HR 1.439, p = 0.014)、术前胆道引流(HR 1.405, p = 0.029)、病理T2期(HR 1.961, p = 0.004)和T3/4期(HR 2.830, p)患者的总生存率(OS)有显著差异。本研究证实了手术切除胰腺癌的ypTNM和pTNM分期之间的可比较生存结果,肯定了TNM分期系统在NAT后的适用性。研究结果强调了TNM分期在指导NAT患者治疗决策中的作用。
Prognostic Accuracy of ypTNM Stage in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Modern Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging manual, which provided ypTNM for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), has not been comparatively assessed against pTNM for prognosis in pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to compare the prognosis between ypTNM and pTNM stages.
Patients and methods: Clinicopathological data from 586 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery at a tertiary center between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed to compare survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages and identify prognostic factors.
Results: The analysis included 541 patients (100 ypTNM, 441 pTNM). Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed among patients stratified by TNM stage (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in OS was found between the ypTNM and pTNM groups (2-year survival rate (YSR): 76.8% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.094). Subgroup analysis by stage I (82.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.577) and II (68.8% vs. 61.6%, p = 0.715), and III (53.0% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.596) revealed similar survival rates. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with OS: age > 65 years (HR 1.763, p < 0.001), CA19-9 > 150 U/mL (HR 1.439, p = 0.014), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 1.405, p = 0.029), pathologic T2 stage (HR 1.961, p = 0.004) and T3/4 stage (HR 2.830, p < 0.001) versus T0/1 stage, lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.220, p < 0.001), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.251, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: This study confirms comparable survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer, affirming the applicability of the TNM staging system after NAT. The results highlight the utility of TNM staging in guiding therapeutic decisions for patients undergoing NAT.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.