导航水安全:流域社会生态系统的可持续性评价。格兰德河流域案例研究,安蒂奥基亚-哥伦比亚。

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-10 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178354
Yésica Gomez-Jaramillo, Lina Berrouet, Clara Villegas-Palacio, Linda Berrio-Giraldo
{"title":"导航水安全:流域社会生态系统的可持续性评价。格兰德河流域案例研究,安蒂奥基亚-哥伦比亚。","authors":"Yésica Gomez-Jaramillo, Lina Berrouet, Clara Villegas-Palacio, Linda Berrio-Giraldo","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socio-ecological sustainability arises from interactions between natural and social systems. Sustainability in water security means effectively managing water resources to continuously achieve social goals without surpassing ecological limits to maintain or enhance ecological integrity and social well-being. Despite efforts to measure sustainability focused on water security, challenges remain, such as selecting indicators that capture socio-ecological dynamics and defining appropriate aggregation methods. This manuscript proposes an operational framework for evaluating socio-ecological sustainability and demonstrates its application through a case study in the Rio Grande Basin (Colombia) in response to such challenges. The operational framework was built based on a literature review on existing frameworks and socio-ecological studies, identifying their potential and capacity to measure the components and variables of an existing conceptual framework. For the calculation, the basin was divided into four zones based on social organization, with a single value derived using four aggregation methods: simple average, weighted average, minimum value, and maximum value. As a result, the framework determines sustainability status using set-indicators representing analysis components, each composed of partial-indicators measuring natural and social system variables. The findings for the basin indicate that it is strongly unsustainable under the first three methods and unsustainable in the highest value of the four zones. This strong unsustainability is due to a lack of ecological integrity (poor erosion control), limiting hydrological functions crucial for water security. Additionally, there is inadequate access to water and sewerage services, and dissatisfaction with water demand, affecting community needs. These assessments may inform decision-making for territorial planning and management. In the study basin, actions targeting erosion control (reforestation, efficient soil management) and enhancing physical and social capacity (service coverage, participation) will promote sustainable management, ensuring social well-being and ecological integrity. This assessment also identifies drivers for transitioning to sustainability, fulfilling water security objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"959 ","pages":"178354"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating water security: A sustainability evaluation in basin socio-ecological systems. The Grande River basin case study, Antioquia-Colombia.\",\"authors\":\"Yésica Gomez-Jaramillo, Lina Berrouet, Clara Villegas-Palacio, Linda Berrio-Giraldo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Socio-ecological sustainability arises from interactions between natural and social systems. Sustainability in water security means effectively managing water resources to continuously achieve social goals without surpassing ecological limits to maintain or enhance ecological integrity and social well-being. Despite efforts to measure sustainability focused on water security, challenges remain, such as selecting indicators that capture socio-ecological dynamics and defining appropriate aggregation methods. This manuscript proposes an operational framework for evaluating socio-ecological sustainability and demonstrates its application through a case study in the Rio Grande Basin (Colombia) in response to such challenges. The operational framework was built based on a literature review on existing frameworks and socio-ecological studies, identifying their potential and capacity to measure the components and variables of an existing conceptual framework. For the calculation, the basin was divided into four zones based on social organization, with a single value derived using four aggregation methods: simple average, weighted average, minimum value, and maximum value. As a result, the framework determines sustainability status using set-indicators representing analysis components, each composed of partial-indicators measuring natural and social system variables. The findings for the basin indicate that it is strongly unsustainable under the first three methods and unsustainable in the highest value of the four zones. This strong unsustainability is due to a lack of ecological integrity (poor erosion control), limiting hydrological functions crucial for water security. Additionally, there is inadequate access to water and sewerage services, and dissatisfaction with water demand, affecting community needs. These assessments may inform decision-making for territorial planning and management. In the study basin, actions targeting erosion control (reforestation, efficient soil management) and enhancing physical and social capacity (service coverage, participation) will promote sustainable management, ensuring social well-being and ecological integrity. This assessment also identifies drivers for transitioning to sustainability, fulfilling water security objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"959 \",\"pages\":\"178354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178354\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会生态可持续性源于自然系统和社会系统之间的相互作用。水安全的可持续性是指有效管理水资源,在不超过生态限制的情况下不断实现社会目标,以维持或加强生态完整性和社会福祉。尽管衡量可持续性的努力以水安全为重点,但挑战仍然存在,例如选择捕捉社会生态动态的指标和确定适当的汇总方法。本文提出了一个评估社会生态可持续性的操作框架,并通过里约热内卢大盆地(哥伦比亚)的案例研究展示了其应用,以应对这些挑战。业务框架是基于对现有框架和社会生态研究的文献综述而建立的,确定了它们衡量现有概念框架的组成部分和变量的潜力和能力。在计算中,基于社会组织将流域划分为4个区域,采用简单平均、加权平均、最小值和最大值4种聚合方法得出单一值。因此,该框架使用代表分析组件的集合指标来确定可持续性状态,每个组件由测量自然和社会系统变量的部分指标组成。结果表明,在前三种方法下,该流域是强不可持续的,在四个区域的最高值处,该流域是不可持续的。这种严重的不可持续性是由于缺乏生态完整性(侵蚀控制不力),限制了对水安全至关重要的水文功能。此外,供水和污水处理服务不足,对用水需求不满,影响了社区的需要。这些评估可为领土规划和管理的决策提供信息。在研究流域,针对侵蚀控制(重新造林、有效土壤管理)和提高物质和社会能力(服务覆盖、参与)的行动将促进可持续管理,确保社会福祉和生态完整性。该评估还确定了向可持续性过渡、实现水安全目标的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating water security: A sustainability evaluation in basin socio-ecological systems. The Grande River basin case study, Antioquia-Colombia.

Socio-ecological sustainability arises from interactions between natural and social systems. Sustainability in water security means effectively managing water resources to continuously achieve social goals without surpassing ecological limits to maintain or enhance ecological integrity and social well-being. Despite efforts to measure sustainability focused on water security, challenges remain, such as selecting indicators that capture socio-ecological dynamics and defining appropriate aggregation methods. This manuscript proposes an operational framework for evaluating socio-ecological sustainability and demonstrates its application through a case study in the Rio Grande Basin (Colombia) in response to such challenges. The operational framework was built based on a literature review on existing frameworks and socio-ecological studies, identifying their potential and capacity to measure the components and variables of an existing conceptual framework. For the calculation, the basin was divided into four zones based on social organization, with a single value derived using four aggregation methods: simple average, weighted average, minimum value, and maximum value. As a result, the framework determines sustainability status using set-indicators representing analysis components, each composed of partial-indicators measuring natural and social system variables. The findings for the basin indicate that it is strongly unsustainable under the first three methods and unsustainable in the highest value of the four zones. This strong unsustainability is due to a lack of ecological integrity (poor erosion control), limiting hydrological functions crucial for water security. Additionally, there is inadequate access to water and sewerage services, and dissatisfaction with water demand, affecting community needs. These assessments may inform decision-making for territorial planning and management. In the study basin, actions targeting erosion control (reforestation, efficient soil management) and enhancing physical and social capacity (service coverage, participation) will promote sustainable management, ensuring social well-being and ecological integrity. This assessment also identifies drivers for transitioning to sustainability, fulfilling water security objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信