改善血液透析中医患互动的患者、护理者和提供者观点:一项定性研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20543581241309986
Melanie D Talson, Priscila Ferreira da Silva, Juli Finlay, Krista Rossum, Kaytlynn V Soroka, Michael McCormick, Arlene Desjarlais, Hans Vorster, Rachelle Sass, Matthew James, Manish M Sood, Allison Jaure, Neesh Pannu, Karthik Tennankore, Stephanie Thompson, Marcello Tonelli, Clara Bohm
{"title":"改善血液透析中医患互动的患者、护理者和提供者观点:一项定性研究。","authors":"Melanie D Talson, Priscila Ferreira da Silva, Juli Finlay, Krista Rossum, Kaytlynn V Soroka, Michael McCormick, Arlene Desjarlais, Hans Vorster, Rachelle Sass, Matthew James, Manish M Sood, Allison Jaure, Neesh Pannu, Karthik Tennankore, Stephanie Thompson, Marcello Tonelli, Clara Bohm","doi":"10.1177/20543581241309986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving interactions between people receiving hemodialysis and health care providers of facility-based hemodialysis care is a top priority for patients, caregivers, and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify challenges for high-quality clinical interactions in facility-based hemodialysis care as well as potential solutions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews to elicit the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five Canadian facility-based hemodialysis centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>English-speaking adults receiving facility-based hemodialysis for longer than 6 months, their caregivers, and hemodialysis health care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2017 and August 2018, focus groups and interviews with patients and their caregivers subsequently informed semi-structured interviews with providers. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with application of a grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 focus groups and 44 interviews were completed. Participants included 64 people receiving hemodialysis, 18 caregivers, and 31 health care providers. Communication between health care providers and patients was often characterized as <i>intersections</i> of care (unidirectional) rather than <i>interactions</i> (bidirectional). Challenges were grouped into 4 main themes as follows: (1) culture of care provision; (2) mistrust between patients and health care providers; (3) time constraints for clinical interactions, and (4) lack of collaboration and care coordination among health care team. Potential solutions were identified for each challenge.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Findings were limited to Canadian context, English-speaking adults, and individuals receiving facility-based hemodialysis in urban centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interactions between health care providers and people receiving dialysis are often unidirectional, where the patient is a passive recipient of ideas and information from the health care provider. To promote improved bidirectional interactions, team-based care that includes better tools to improve information transfer, better information regarding roles, and identity of health care team members and opportunities for all members of the health care team, including the people receiving dialysis, to provide input on care plans is required.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581241309986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives on Improving Provider-Patient Interactions in Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie D Talson, Priscila Ferreira da Silva, Juli Finlay, Krista Rossum, Kaytlynn V Soroka, Michael McCormick, Arlene Desjarlais, Hans Vorster, Rachelle Sass, Matthew James, Manish M Sood, Allison Jaure, Neesh Pannu, Karthik Tennankore, Stephanie Thompson, Marcello Tonelli, Clara Bohm\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20543581241309986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving interactions between people receiving hemodialysis and health care providers of facility-based hemodialysis care is a top priority for patients, caregivers, and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify challenges for high-quality clinical interactions in facility-based hemodialysis care as well as potential solutions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews to elicit the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five Canadian facility-based hemodialysis centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>English-speaking adults receiving facility-based hemodialysis for longer than 6 months, their caregivers, and hemodialysis health care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2017 and August 2018, focus groups and interviews with patients and their caregivers subsequently informed semi-structured interviews with providers. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with application of a grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 focus groups and 44 interviews were completed. Participants included 64 people receiving hemodialysis, 18 caregivers, and 31 health care providers. Communication between health care providers and patients was often characterized as <i>intersections</i> of care (unidirectional) rather than <i>interactions</i> (bidirectional). Challenges were grouped into 4 main themes as follows: (1) culture of care provision; (2) mistrust between patients and health care providers; (3) time constraints for clinical interactions, and (4) lack of collaboration and care coordination among health care team. Potential solutions were identified for each challenge.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Findings were limited to Canadian context, English-speaking adults, and individuals receiving facility-based hemodialysis in urban centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interactions between health care providers and people receiving dialysis are often unidirectional, where the patient is a passive recipient of ideas and information from the health care provider. To promote improved bidirectional interactions, team-based care that includes better tools to improve information transfer, better information regarding roles, and identity of health care team members and opportunities for all members of the health care team, including the people receiving dialysis, to provide input on care plans is required.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20543581241309986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581241309986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581241309986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:改善接受血液透析的人与以设施为基础的血液透析护理的卫生保健提供者之间的互动是患者、护理人员和卫生保健提供者的首要任务。目的:确定在以设施为基础的血液透析护理中高质量临床互动的挑战以及潜在的解决方案。设计:采用焦点小组和半结构化访谈的多中心定性研究,以引出患者、护理人员和卫生保健提供者的观点。环境:五个加拿大血透中心。参与者:接受血透治疗超过6个月的英语成年人、他们的护理人员和血透保健提供者。方法:在2017年5月至2018年8月期间,对患者及其护理人员进行焦点小组和访谈,随后对提供者进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用归纳主题分析与扎根理论的应用方法。结果:共完成8个焦点小组和44个访谈。参与者包括64名接受血液透析的人,18名护理人员和31名卫生保健提供者。卫生保健提供者和患者之间的沟通通常被描述为护理的交叉点(单向),而不是相互作用(双向)。挑战分为以下4个主题:(1)护理文化;(2)患者与医护人员之间的不信任;(3)临床互动的时间限制;(4)卫生保健团队之间缺乏协作和护理协调。针对每个挑战确定了可能的解决方案。局限性:研究结果仅限于加拿大背景、讲英语的成年人和在城市中心接受基于设施的血液透析的个人。结论:卫生保健提供者和接受透析的人之间的互动往往是单向的,病人是一个被动的接受者,从卫生保健提供者的想法和信息。为了促进改进的双向互动,需要以团队为基础的护理,包括更好的工具来改进信息传递,更好地了解保健团队成员的角色和身份,并为保健团队的所有成员(包括接受透析的人)提供机会,为护理计划提供投入。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives on Improving Provider-Patient Interactions in Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Improving interactions between people receiving hemodialysis and health care providers of facility-based hemodialysis care is a top priority for patients, caregivers, and health care providers.

Objective: To identify challenges for high-quality clinical interactions in facility-based hemodialysis care as well as potential solutions.

Design: Multicentre qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews to elicit the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and health care providers.

Setting: Five Canadian facility-based hemodialysis centers.

Participants: English-speaking adults receiving facility-based hemodialysis for longer than 6 months, their caregivers, and hemodialysis health care providers.

Methods: Between May 2017 and August 2018, focus groups and interviews with patients and their caregivers subsequently informed semi-structured interviews with providers. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with application of a grounded theory approach.

Results: A total of 8 focus groups and 44 interviews were completed. Participants included 64 people receiving hemodialysis, 18 caregivers, and 31 health care providers. Communication between health care providers and patients was often characterized as intersections of care (unidirectional) rather than interactions (bidirectional). Challenges were grouped into 4 main themes as follows: (1) culture of care provision; (2) mistrust between patients and health care providers; (3) time constraints for clinical interactions, and (4) lack of collaboration and care coordination among health care team. Potential solutions were identified for each challenge.

Limitations: Findings were limited to Canadian context, English-speaking adults, and individuals receiving facility-based hemodialysis in urban centers.

Conclusions: Interactions between health care providers and people receiving dialysis are often unidirectional, where the patient is a passive recipient of ideas and information from the health care provider. To promote improved bidirectional interactions, team-based care that includes better tools to improve information transfer, better information regarding roles, and identity of health care team members and opportunities for all members of the health care team, including the people receiving dialysis, to provide input on care plans is required.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, the official journal of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encourages high quality submissions focused on clinical, translational and health services delivery research in the field of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation and organ donation. Our mandate is to promote and advocate for kidney health as it impacts national and international communities. Basic science, translational studies and clinical studies will be peer reviewed and processed by an Editorial Board comprised of geographically diverse Canadian and international nephrologists, internists and allied health professionals; this Editorial Board is mandated to ensure highest quality publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信