一项模型研究,旨在确定学校和工作场所抗原筛查指南,以减轻COVID-19的爆发。

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yong Dam Jeong, Keisuke Ejima, Kwang Su Kim, Shoya Iwanami, William S Hart, Robin N Thompson, Il Hyo Jung, Shingo Iwami, Marco Ajelli, Kazuyuki Aihara
{"title":"一项模型研究,旨在确定学校和工作场所抗原筛查指南,以减轻COVID-19的爆发。","authors":"Yong Dam Jeong, Keisuke Ejima, Kwang Su Kim, Shoya Iwanami, William S Hart, Robin N Thompson, Il Hyo Jung, Shingo Iwami, Marco Ajelli, Kazuyuki Aihara","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00716-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-person interaction offers invaluable benefits to people. To guarantee safe in-person activities during a COVID-19 outbreak, effective identification of infectious individuals is essential. In this study, we aim to analyze the impact of screening with antigen tests in schools and workplaces on identifying COVID-19 infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assess the effectiveness of various screening test strategies with antigen tests in schools and workplaces through quantitative simulations. The primary outcome of our analyses is the proportion of infected individuals identified. The transmission process at the population level is modeled using a deterministic compartmental model. Infected individuals are identified through screening tests or symptom development. The time-varying sensitivity of antigen tests and infectiousness is determined by a viral dynamics model. Screening test strategies are characterized by the screening schedule, sensitivity of antigen tests, screening duration, timing of screening initiation, and available tests per person.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we show that early and frequent screening is the key to maximizing the effectiveness of the screening program. For example, 44.5% (95% CI: 40.8-47.5) of infected individuals are identified by daily testing, whereas it is only 33.7% (95% CI: 30.5-37.3) when testing is performed at the end of the program duration. If high sensitivity antigen tests (Detection limit: <math><mn>6.3</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow> <mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> copies/mL) are deployed, it reaches 69.3% (95% CI: 66.5-72.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High sensitivity antigen tests, high frequency screening tests, and immediate initiation of screening tests are important to safely restart educational and economic activities in-person. Our computational framework is useful for assessing screening programs by incorporating situation-specific factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modeling study to define guidelines for antigen screening in schools and workplaces to mitigate COVID-19 outbreaks.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Dam Jeong, Keisuke Ejima, Kwang Su Kim, Shoya Iwanami, William S Hart, Robin N Thompson, Il Hyo Jung, Shingo Iwami, Marco Ajelli, Kazuyuki Aihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-024-00716-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-person interaction offers invaluable benefits to people. To guarantee safe in-person activities during a COVID-19 outbreak, effective identification of infectious individuals is essential. In this study, we aim to analyze the impact of screening with antigen tests in schools and workplaces on identifying COVID-19 infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assess the effectiveness of various screening test strategies with antigen tests in schools and workplaces through quantitative simulations. The primary outcome of our analyses is the proportion of infected individuals identified. The transmission process at the population level is modeled using a deterministic compartmental model. Infected individuals are identified through screening tests or symptom development. The time-varying sensitivity of antigen tests and infectiousness is determined by a viral dynamics model. Screening test strategies are characterized by the screening schedule, sensitivity of antigen tests, screening duration, timing of screening initiation, and available tests per person.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we show that early and frequent screening is the key to maximizing the effectiveness of the screening program. For example, 44.5% (95% CI: 40.8-47.5) of infected individuals are identified by daily testing, whereas it is only 33.7% (95% CI: 30.5-37.3) when testing is performed at the end of the program duration. If high sensitivity antigen tests (Detection limit: <math><mn>6.3</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow> <mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow> </msup> </math> copies/mL) are deployed, it reaches 69.3% (95% CI: 66.5-72.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High sensitivity antigen tests, high frequency screening tests, and immediate initiation of screening tests are important to safely restart educational and economic activities in-person. Our computational framework is useful for assessing screening programs by incorporating situation-specific factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00716-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00716-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:面对面的互动为人们提供了无价的好处。为确保COVID-19疫情期间安全的人身活动,有效识别感染个体至关重要。在本研究中,我们旨在分析在学校和工作场所进行抗原检测筛查对识别COVID-19感染的影响。方法:通过定量模拟,评估学校和工作场所各种抗原检测筛查策略的有效性。我们分析的主要结果是确定受感染个体的比例。种群水平上的传播过程采用确定性区室模型进行建模。通过筛选试验或症状发展来确定感染者。抗原试验的时变敏感性和传染性由病毒动力学模型决定。筛选试验策略的特点是筛选时间表、抗原试验的敏感性、筛选持续时间、筛选开始的时间和每人可获得的试验。结果:在这里,我们表明早期和频繁的筛查是最大化筛查计划有效性的关键。例如,44.5% (95% CI: 40.8-47.5)的感染者通过日常检测被识别,而在项目持续时间结束时进行检测时,这一比例仅为33.7% (95% CI: 30.5-37.3)。如果采用高灵敏度抗原检测(检出限为6.3 × 10 4拷贝/mL),可达69.3% (95% CI: 66.5-72.5)。结论:高敏感性抗原检测、高频率筛查检测和立即启动筛查检测对安全重启教育和经济活动具有重要意义。我们的计算框架对于通过结合具体情况因素来评估筛查项目是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A modeling study to define guidelines for antigen screening in schools and workplaces to mitigate COVID-19 outbreaks.

Background: In-person interaction offers invaluable benefits to people. To guarantee safe in-person activities during a COVID-19 outbreak, effective identification of infectious individuals is essential. In this study, we aim to analyze the impact of screening with antigen tests in schools and workplaces on identifying COVID-19 infections.

Methods: We assess the effectiveness of various screening test strategies with antigen tests in schools and workplaces through quantitative simulations. The primary outcome of our analyses is the proportion of infected individuals identified. The transmission process at the population level is modeled using a deterministic compartmental model. Infected individuals are identified through screening tests or symptom development. The time-varying sensitivity of antigen tests and infectiousness is determined by a viral dynamics model. Screening test strategies are characterized by the screening schedule, sensitivity of antigen tests, screening duration, timing of screening initiation, and available tests per person.

Results: Here, we show that early and frequent screening is the key to maximizing the effectiveness of the screening program. For example, 44.5% (95% CI: 40.8-47.5) of infected individuals are identified by daily testing, whereas it is only 33.7% (95% CI: 30.5-37.3) when testing is performed at the end of the program duration. If high sensitivity antigen tests (Detection limit: 6.3 × 10 4 copies/mL) are deployed, it reaches 69.3% (95% CI: 66.5-72.5).

Conclusions: High sensitivity antigen tests, high frequency screening tests, and immediate initiation of screening tests are important to safely restart educational and economic activities in-person. Our computational framework is useful for assessing screening programs by incorporating situation-specific factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信