鞘内巴氯芬泵的疗效、适应症和安全性:叙述性综述。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alan D Kaye, Se Yun Cheon, Morgan H Roque, Caroline Gibbs, Karlee R Mott, Alex M Wandler, Syeda T Munir, Junyu Lin, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Harish Siddaiah, Sarah H Myers, Kristin Nicole Bembenick, Sahar Shekoohi
{"title":"鞘内巴氯芬泵的疗效、适应症和安全性:叙述性综述。","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Se Yun Cheon, Morgan H Roque, Caroline Gibbs, Karlee R Mott, Alex M Wandler, Syeda T Munir, Junyu Lin, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Harish Siddaiah, Sarah H Myers, Kristin Nicole Bembenick, Sahar Shekoohi","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01310-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Baclofen, a muscle relaxant that reduces the release of excitatory neurotransmitters in the pre-synaptic neurons stimulating inhibitory neuronal signals in post-synaptic neurons, has been around for over 5 decades. Baclofen is used primarily for spasticity and since 1982, has had a role as an intrathecal agent. In the present investigation, we review research trends and updates on safety and efficacy of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evaluation of safety and efficacy of ITB pumps in spasticity and relevant conditions was evaluated in the present investigation. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to review appropriate related literature. Commonly reported aspects regarding ITB efficacy include comparison with alternative treatments, maintenance efficacy, and long-term outcomes. Safety considerations and risk factors associated with ITB include postoperative complications, withdrawal symptoms, tolerance issues, long-term management, and contraindications. In summary, the present investigation reveals that ITB is efficacious for muscle spasticity; however, efforts should be made to enhance safety and efficacy by providing improved best practice guidelines on maximum safe dose with the least amount of risk with individualized treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy, Indications, and Safety of Intrathecal Baclofen Pump: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Alan D Kaye, Se Yun Cheon, Morgan H Roque, Caroline Gibbs, Karlee R Mott, Alex M Wandler, Syeda T Munir, Junyu Lin, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Harish Siddaiah, Sarah H Myers, Kristin Nicole Bembenick, Sahar Shekoohi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-024-01310-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Baclofen, a muscle relaxant that reduces the release of excitatory neurotransmitters in the pre-synaptic neurons stimulating inhibitory neuronal signals in post-synaptic neurons, has been around for over 5 decades. Baclofen is used primarily for spasticity and since 1982, has had a role as an intrathecal agent. In the present investigation, we review research trends and updates on safety and efficacy of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evaluation of safety and efficacy of ITB pumps in spasticity and relevant conditions was evaluated in the present investigation. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to review appropriate related literature. Commonly reported aspects regarding ITB efficacy include comparison with alternative treatments, maintenance efficacy, and long-term outcomes. Safety considerations and risk factors associated with ITB include postoperative complications, withdrawal symptoms, tolerance issues, long-term management, and contraindications. In summary, the present investigation reveals that ITB is efficacious for muscle spasticity; however, efforts should be made to enhance safety and efficacy by providing improved best practice guidelines on maximum safe dose with the least amount of risk with individualized treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01310-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01310-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:巴氯芬是一种肌肉松弛剂,可减少突触前神经元中兴奋性神经递质的释放,刺激突触后神经元中的抑制性神经信号,已经存在了50多年。巴氯芬主要用于治疗痉挛,自1982年以来,它被用作鞘内药物。在本研究中,我们回顾了鞘内巴氯芬(ITB)泵的安全性和有效性的研究趋势和最新进展。最近的发现:在本研究中评估了痉挛和相关条件下ITB泵的安全性和有效性。使用PubMed和ClinicalTrials.gov查阅相关文献。通常报道的关于ITB疗效的方面包括与替代治疗的比较,维持疗效和长期结果。与ITB相关的安全考虑和危险因素包括术后并发症、戒断症状、耐受性问题、长期管理和禁忌症。总之,目前的研究表明,ITB对肌肉痉挛有效;然而,应通过提供关于个体化治疗中风险最小的最大安全剂量的改进最佳实践指南,努力提高安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy, Indications, and Safety of Intrathecal Baclofen Pump: A Narrative Review.

Purpose of review: Baclofen, a muscle relaxant that reduces the release of excitatory neurotransmitters in the pre-synaptic neurons stimulating inhibitory neuronal signals in post-synaptic neurons, has been around for over 5 decades. Baclofen is used primarily for spasticity and since 1982, has had a role as an intrathecal agent. In the present investigation, we review research trends and updates on safety and efficacy of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps.

Recent findings: Evaluation of safety and efficacy of ITB pumps in spasticity and relevant conditions was evaluated in the present investigation. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to review appropriate related literature. Commonly reported aspects regarding ITB efficacy include comparison with alternative treatments, maintenance efficacy, and long-term outcomes. Safety considerations and risk factors associated with ITB include postoperative complications, withdrawal symptoms, tolerance issues, long-term management, and contraindications. In summary, the present investigation reveals that ITB is efficacious for muscle spasticity; however, efforts should be made to enhance safety and efficacy by providing improved best practice guidelines on maximum safe dose with the least amount of risk with individualized treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信