自闭症症状维度问卷的心理测量评估。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"自闭症症状维度问卷的心理测量评估。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study re-examined a caregiver-reported measure of autism symptoms called the Autism Symptom Dimensions Questionnaire (ASDQ). The ASDQ was evaluated using two large samples and a small series of children receiving intensive behavioral intervention. The large samples included a national US population sample and a national clinical sample with over-representation of individuals from historically underrepresented backgrounds who were using public insurance. Both samples included young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and young people with non-ASD developmental conditions.</p><p>The ASDQ was evaluated in terms of its structure, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The first major finding was that the structure of the ASDQ replicated across both large samples and was consistent with prior research. The second major fining was that the ASDQ showed very good reliability, including good ability to measure across low, average, and high score ranges, and good stability of scores across time. The third major finding was that the ASDQ showed moderate to strong associations with other measures of autism symptoms, even when those measures came from different modalities (e.g. clinician observation). The fourth major finding was that the ASDQ had very good ability to screen for ASD in the population sample but had weaker validity for detecting ASD in the clinical sample. The last major finding from the small case series was that the ASDQ showed the ability to detect reliable change in autism symptoms and social communication/interaction behavior in children receiving intensive behavioral intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":"67 3","pages":"e68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dmcn.16229","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the Autism Symptom Dimensions Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmcn.16229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study re-examined a caregiver-reported measure of autism symptoms called the Autism Symptom Dimensions Questionnaire (ASDQ). The ASDQ was evaluated using two large samples and a small series of children receiving intensive behavioral intervention. The large samples included a national US population sample and a national clinical sample with over-representation of individuals from historically underrepresented backgrounds who were using public insurance. Both samples included young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and young people with non-ASD developmental conditions.</p><p>The ASDQ was evaluated in terms of its structure, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The first major finding was that the structure of the ASDQ replicated across both large samples and was consistent with prior research. The second major fining was that the ASDQ showed very good reliability, including good ability to measure across low, average, and high score ranges, and good stability of scores across time. The third major finding was that the ASDQ showed moderate to strong associations with other measures of autism symptoms, even when those measures came from different modalities (e.g. clinician observation). The fourth major finding was that the ASDQ had very good ability to screen for ASD in the population sample but had weaker validity for detecting ASD in the clinical sample. The last major finding from the small case series was that the ASDQ showed the ability to detect reliable change in autism symptoms and social communication/interaction behavior in children receiving intensive behavioral intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\"67 3\",\"pages\":\"e68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dmcn.16229\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.16229\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.16229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychometric evaluation of the Autism Symptom Dimensions Questionnaire

Psychometric evaluation of the Autism Symptom Dimensions Questionnaire

This study re-examined a caregiver-reported measure of autism symptoms called the Autism Symptom Dimensions Questionnaire (ASDQ). The ASDQ was evaluated using two large samples and a small series of children receiving intensive behavioral intervention. The large samples included a national US population sample and a national clinical sample with over-representation of individuals from historically underrepresented backgrounds who were using public insurance. Both samples included young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and young people with non-ASD developmental conditions.

The ASDQ was evaluated in terms of its structure, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The first major finding was that the structure of the ASDQ replicated across both large samples and was consistent with prior research. The second major fining was that the ASDQ showed very good reliability, including good ability to measure across low, average, and high score ranges, and good stability of scores across time. The third major finding was that the ASDQ showed moderate to strong associations with other measures of autism symptoms, even when those measures came from different modalities (e.g. clinician observation). The fourth major finding was that the ASDQ had very good ability to screen for ASD in the population sample but had weaker validity for detecting ASD in the clinical sample. The last major finding from the small case series was that the ASDQ showed the ability to detect reliable change in autism symptoms and social communication/interaction behavior in children receiving intensive behavioral intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信