闭合性与开放性单纯性踝关节骨折需要软组织重建的临床结果:一项前瞻性比较观察研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
R Ahluwalia, T Lewis, Z Marhoon, C Bano, T Howard, H Greenberg, A Vasireddy, A Din, E Fitzgerald O'Connor, V Rose, I Reichert
{"title":"闭合性与开放性单纯性踝关节骨折需要软组织重建的临床结果:一项前瞻性比较观察研究。","authors":"R Ahluwalia, T Lewis, Z Marhoon, C Bano, T Howard, H Greenberg, A Vasireddy, A Din, E Fitzgerald O'Connor, V Rose, I Reichert","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of closed versus open simple ankle fractures patterns requiring soft tissue reconstruction: A prospective comparative observational study.\",\"authors\":\"R Ahluwalia, T Lewis, Z Marhoon, C Bano, T Howard, H Greenberg, A Vasireddy, A Din, E Fitzgerald O'Connor, V Rose, I Reichert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当代指南提倡对开放性骨折进行初始清创和一期明确固定并立即进行软组织重建。本研究旨在评估与闭合性骨折相比,开放式踝关节骨折单阶段稳定和立即确定软组织覆盖的有效性。方法:我们将2017年1月至2019年6月期间治疗的所有孤立性开放性踝关节骨折(OF)与手术治疗的闭合性踝关节骨折(CF)对照组进行比较。OF组包括广泛软组织损伤丧失伴骨膜剥离和骨暴露的患者(Gustilo和Anderson IIIB),需要裂皮移植、旋转皮瓣或自由皮瓣。评估的临床结果包括感染率、截肢、翻修手术、手术复位、不愈合率和功能结果(使用MOXFQ和EQ-5D-5L问卷进行评估)。利用保健提供者矩阵来评估成本效益参数,如住院时间(LOS)。结果:采用标准治疗方案对27例of和35例CF的AO分型44例a - c型骨折进行分析。没有截肢的报道,但是在OF组中有3例患者发生了深/浅表感染,而CF组中有2例。不愈合(P = .11)、额外手术率和出院次数在of组中增加了3倍。(P 结论:在开放性踝关节骨折的治疗中,明确的稳定和立即的软组织重建可以获得较高的肢体保留率,并且在完成骨科治疗后获得与匹配的闭合性踝关节骨折相似的功能结果。虽然病人的旅程延长,软组织和感染并发症没有显著差异。这需要进一步调查,以确定这种方法的长期成本效益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes of closed versus open simple ankle fractures patterns requiring soft tissue reconstruction: A prospective comparative observational study.

Background: Contemporary guidelines advocate for initial debridement and single-stage definitive fixation with immediate soft tissue reconstruction for open fractures. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage stabilization and immediate definitive soft tissue coverage in open ankle fractures compared to closed fractures.

Methods: We compared all isolated open ankle fractures (OF) treated between January 2017 and June 2019 to a control group of operatively managed closed ankle fractures (CF). The OF group included patients with extensive soft tissue injury loss with periosteal stripping and bone exposure (Gustilo and Anderson IIIB) requiring split skin graft, rotational flap or free flap. Clinical outcomes assessed included infection rates, amputation, revision hardware surgery, surgical reduction, non-union rates, and functional outcomes (assessed using the MOXFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires). Health provider matrices were utilized to evaluate cost-benefit parameters, such as length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

Results: A total of 27 OF and 35 CF cases with AO classification 44 A-C fractures were analyzed following standard treatment protocols. No amputations were reported, but deep/superficial infections occurred in 3 patients in the OF group compared to 2 in the CF group. There was a three-folds increase in mal-union (P = .11), rates of additional surgeries and discharge times in the OF group. (P < 0.05). However, return to functional weight bearing between OF (mean 10.6 weeks) and CF (mean 7.2 weeks) was similar (P = 0.06), and there were no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L and MOXFQ scores at the end of orthopaedic treatment p = 0.5 and 0.16 respectively. The mean hospital LOS was significantly longer for OF (15.6 days) compared to CF (5.4 days) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Definitive stabilization and immediate soft tissue reconstruction in the management of open ankle fractures result in high rates of limb salvage and achieve functional outcomes similar to those seen in matched closed ankle fractures upon completion of orthopedic treatment. Although the patient journey is extended, soft tissue and infective complications do not significantly differ. This calls for further investigation to establish the long-term cost-benefit implications of this approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信