分析用于去除头部 CT 扫描面部特征的 TotalSegmentator。

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M. Lindholz , R. Ruppel , S. Schulze-Weddige , G.L. Baumgärtner , I. Schobert , A. Panten , R. Schmidt , T.A. Auer , J. Nawabi , A.-M. Haack , L. Stepansky , L. Poggi , R. Hosch , C.A. Hamm , T. Penzkofer
{"title":"分析用于去除头部 CT 扫描面部特征的 TotalSegmentator。","authors":"M. Lindholz ,&nbsp;R. Ruppel ,&nbsp;S. Schulze-Weddige ,&nbsp;G.L. Baumgärtner ,&nbsp;I. Schobert ,&nbsp;A. Panten ,&nbsp;R. Schmidt ,&nbsp;T.A. Auer ,&nbsp;J. Nawabi ,&nbsp;A.-M. Haack ,&nbsp;L. Stepansky ,&nbsp;L. Poggi ,&nbsp;R. Hosch ,&nbsp;C.A. Hamm ,&nbsp;T. Penzkofer","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Facial recognition technology in medical imaging, particularly with head scans, poses privacy risks due to identifiable facial features. This study evaluates the use of facial recognition software in identifying facial features from head CT scans and explores a defacing pipeline using TotalSegmentator to reduce re-identification risks while preserving data integrity for research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>1404 high-quality renderings from the UCLH EIT Stroke dataset, both with and without defacing were analysed. The performance of defacing with the face mask created by TotalSegmentator was compared to a state-of-the-art CT defacing algorithm. Face detection was performed using deep learning models. The cosine similarity between facial embeddings for intra- and inter-patient images was compared. A Support Vector Machine was trained on cosine similarity values to assess defacing performance, determining if two renderings came from the same patient. This analysis was conducted on defaced and non-defaced images using 5-fold cross-validation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Faces were detected in 76.5 % of non-defaced images. Intra-patient images exhibited a median cosine similarity of 0.65 (IQR: 0.47–0.80), compared to 0.50 (IQR: 0.39–0.62) for inter-patient images. A binary classifier performed moderately on non-defaced images, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.69 (SD = 0.01) and an accuracy of 0.65 (SD = 0.01) in distinguishing whether a scan belonged to the same or a different individual. Following defacing, performance declined markedly. Defacing with the TotalSegmentator decreased the ROC-AUC to 0.55 (SD = 0.02) and the accuracy to 0.56 (SD = 0.01), whereas the CTA-DEFACE algorithm brought the performance down to a ROC-AUC of 0.60 (SD = 0.02) and an accuracy of 0.59 (SD = 0.01). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of defacing algorithms in mitigating re-identification risks, with the TotalSegmentator providing slightly superior privacy protection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Facial recognition software can identify facial features from partial and complete head CT scan renderings. However, using the TotalSegmentator to deface images reduces re-identification risks to a near-chance level. We offer code to implement this privacy-preserving pipeline.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Utilizing the TotalSegmentator framework, the proposed pipeline efficiently removes facial features from CT images, making it ideal for multi-site research and data sharing. It is a useful tool for radiographers and radiologists who must comply with medico-legal requirements necessitating the removal of facial features.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 372-378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the TotalSegmentator for facial feature removal in head CT scans\",\"authors\":\"M. Lindholz ,&nbsp;R. Ruppel ,&nbsp;S. Schulze-Weddige ,&nbsp;G.L. Baumgärtner ,&nbsp;I. Schobert ,&nbsp;A. Panten ,&nbsp;R. Schmidt ,&nbsp;T.A. Auer ,&nbsp;J. Nawabi ,&nbsp;A.-M. Haack ,&nbsp;L. Stepansky ,&nbsp;L. Poggi ,&nbsp;R. Hosch ,&nbsp;C.A. Hamm ,&nbsp;T. Penzkofer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.12.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Facial recognition technology in medical imaging, particularly with head scans, poses privacy risks due to identifiable facial features. This study evaluates the use of facial recognition software in identifying facial features from head CT scans and explores a defacing pipeline using TotalSegmentator to reduce re-identification risks while preserving data integrity for research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>1404 high-quality renderings from the UCLH EIT Stroke dataset, both with and without defacing were analysed. The performance of defacing with the face mask created by TotalSegmentator was compared to a state-of-the-art CT defacing algorithm. Face detection was performed using deep learning models. The cosine similarity between facial embeddings for intra- and inter-patient images was compared. A Support Vector Machine was trained on cosine similarity values to assess defacing performance, determining if two renderings came from the same patient. This analysis was conducted on defaced and non-defaced images using 5-fold cross-validation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Faces were detected in 76.5 % of non-defaced images. Intra-patient images exhibited a median cosine similarity of 0.65 (IQR: 0.47–0.80), compared to 0.50 (IQR: 0.39–0.62) for inter-patient images. A binary classifier performed moderately on non-defaced images, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.69 (SD = 0.01) and an accuracy of 0.65 (SD = 0.01) in distinguishing whether a scan belonged to the same or a different individual. Following defacing, performance declined markedly. Defacing with the TotalSegmentator decreased the ROC-AUC to 0.55 (SD = 0.02) and the accuracy to 0.56 (SD = 0.01), whereas the CTA-DEFACE algorithm brought the performance down to a ROC-AUC of 0.60 (SD = 0.02) and an accuracy of 0.59 (SD = 0.01). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of defacing algorithms in mitigating re-identification risks, with the TotalSegmentator providing slightly superior privacy protection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Facial recognition software can identify facial features from partial and complete head CT scan renderings. However, using the TotalSegmentator to deface images reduces re-identification risks to a near-chance level. We offer code to implement this privacy-preserving pipeline.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Utilizing the TotalSegmentator framework, the proposed pipeline efficiently removes facial features from CT images, making it ideal for multi-site research and data sharing. It is a useful tool for radiographers and radiologists who must comply with medico-legal requirements necessitating the removal of facial features.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 372-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医学成像中的面部识别技术,特别是头部扫描,由于可识别的面部特征,带来了隐私风险。本研究评估了面部识别软件在识别头部CT扫描面部特征方面的使用,并探索了使用TotalSegmentator的污损管道,以减少重新识别风险,同时保持研究数据的完整性。方法:对来自UCLH EIT卒中数据集的1404张高质量渲染图进行分析,包括有和没有污损的渲染图。使用TotalSegmentator创建的面罩进行污损的性能与最先进的CT污损算法进行了比较。人脸检测使用深度学习模型进行。比较了患者间图像和患者内图像面部嵌入的余弦相似度。支持向量机训练余弦相似值来评估污损性能,确定两个渲染是否来自同一患者。使用5倍交叉验证对污损和非污损图像进行了分析。结果:76.5%的无污损图像能检出人脸。患者内部图像的中位数余弦相似性为0.65 (IQR: 0.47-0.80),而患者间图像的中位数余弦相似性为0.50 (IQR: 0.39-0.62)。二值分类器在非污损图像上表现一般,在区分扫描是否属于同一或不同个体时,实现了0.69 (SD = 0.01)的ROC-AUC和0.65 (SD = 0.01)的准确度。涂改后,业绩显著下降。TotalSegmentator Defacing算法的ROC-AUC降至0.55 (SD = 0.02),准确率降至0.56 (SD = 0.01),而CTA-DEFACE算法的ROC-AUC降至0.60 (SD = 0.02),准确率降至0.59 (SD = 0.01)。这些结果证明了污损算法在减轻重新识别风险方面的有效性,TotalSegmentator提供了稍微优越的隐私保护。结论:人脸识别软件可以从部分和完整的头部CT扫描效果图中识别出面部特征。然而,使用TotalSegmentator来污损图像可以将重新识别的风险降低到近乎偶然的水平。我们提供代码来实现这个保护隐私的管道。实践意义:利用TotalSegmentator框架,所提出的管道有效地从CT图像中去除面部特征,使其成为多站点研究和数据共享的理想选择。对于必须遵守医学法律要求去除面部特征的放射技师和放射科医生来说,这是一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analyzing the TotalSegmentator for facial feature removal in head CT scans

Analyzing the TotalSegmentator for facial feature removal in head CT scans

Background

Facial recognition technology in medical imaging, particularly with head scans, poses privacy risks due to identifiable facial features. This study evaluates the use of facial recognition software in identifying facial features from head CT scans and explores a defacing pipeline using TotalSegmentator to reduce re-identification risks while preserving data integrity for research.

Methods

1404 high-quality renderings from the UCLH EIT Stroke dataset, both with and without defacing were analysed. The performance of defacing with the face mask created by TotalSegmentator was compared to a state-of-the-art CT defacing algorithm. Face detection was performed using deep learning models. The cosine similarity between facial embeddings for intra- and inter-patient images was compared. A Support Vector Machine was trained on cosine similarity values to assess defacing performance, determining if two renderings came from the same patient. This analysis was conducted on defaced and non-defaced images using 5-fold cross-validation.

Results

Faces were detected in 76.5 % of non-defaced images. Intra-patient images exhibited a median cosine similarity of 0.65 (IQR: 0.47–0.80), compared to 0.50 (IQR: 0.39–0.62) for inter-patient images. A binary classifier performed moderately on non-defaced images, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.69 (SD = 0.01) and an accuracy of 0.65 (SD = 0.01) in distinguishing whether a scan belonged to the same or a different individual. Following defacing, performance declined markedly. Defacing with the TotalSegmentator decreased the ROC-AUC to 0.55 (SD = 0.02) and the accuracy to 0.56 (SD = 0.01), whereas the CTA-DEFACE algorithm brought the performance down to a ROC-AUC of 0.60 (SD = 0.02) and an accuracy of 0.59 (SD = 0.01). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of defacing algorithms in mitigating re-identification risks, with the TotalSegmentator providing slightly superior privacy protection.

Conclusion

Facial recognition software can identify facial features from partial and complete head CT scan renderings. However, using the TotalSegmentator to deface images reduces re-identification risks to a near-chance level. We offer code to implement this privacy-preserving pipeline.

Implications for practice

Utilizing the TotalSegmentator framework, the proposed pipeline efficiently removes facial features from CT images, making it ideal for multi-site research and data sharing. It is a useful tool for radiographers and radiologists who must comply with medico-legal requirements necessitating the removal of facial features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信