Jamie Jy Kwon, Thomas D Milner, Cornelius Kürten, Emily Ht Pang, Wanwen Chen, Khanh Linh Tran, Don Wilson, Dennis Dimond, Septimiu E Salcudean, Eitan Prisman
{"title":"经宫颈超声引导下的经口机器人手术。","authors":"Jamie Jy Kwon, Thomas D Milner, Cornelius Kürten, Emily Ht Pang, Wanwen Chen, Khanh Linh Tran, Don Wilson, Dennis Dimond, Septimiu E Salcudean, Eitan Prisman","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma (OPSCC), preoperative imaging and intraoperative visualization plays a pivotal role in optimizing resection margins. Prior work has demonstrated the ability of transoral ultrasound (US) in identifying OPSCC margins and vascular structures. This study evaluates the effectiveness of transcervical ultrasound (TUS), as well as other preoperative imaging modalities, in evaluating OPSCC volumes and compares this to post TORS pathological OPSCC volumes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one patients undergoing TORS between 2021 and 2023 were included. TUS was performed in all 41 patients, of which 37 had preoperative CT, 16 had PET-CT and 15 had MRI. Tumor dimensions on TUS, CT, and MRI were measured in craniocaudal, anteroposterior, and mediolateral planes to compute tumor volumes. Preoperative PET-CTs were analyzed to compute the metabolic tumour volume (MTV). Pathological tumor volumes served as the gold standard for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between pathological tumor volumes and those measured by TUS, CT, PET-CT, or MRI (p = 0.57, 0.47, 0.28, 0.29). Both TUS and PET-CT showed strong correlation with pathology (R = 0.92, p < 0.0001), followed by CT (R = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and MRI (R = 0.55, p = 0.031). The percent difference of radiologic volumes from pathology volumes was lowest for MRI (19.37 % ± 28.28), followed by TUS (26.12 % ± 20.97), PET-CT (32.59 % ± 21.95), and CT (39.94 % ± 62.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TUS demonstrates comparable accuracy to CT, PET-CT, and MRI in assessing primary tumor volumes in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) undergoing TORS. The strong correlation of TUS with final pathology, combined with its relatively non-invasive transcervical (versus transoral) approach and real-time acquisition, suggests that TUS has the potential to supplement TORS with image guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"161 ","pages":"107167"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards transcervical ultrasound-guided transoral robotic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Jy Kwon, Thomas D Milner, Cornelius Kürten, Emily Ht Pang, Wanwen Chen, Khanh Linh Tran, Don Wilson, Dennis Dimond, Septimiu E Salcudean, Eitan Prisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma (OPSCC), preoperative imaging and intraoperative visualization plays a pivotal role in optimizing resection margins. Prior work has demonstrated the ability of transoral ultrasound (US) in identifying OPSCC margins and vascular structures. This study evaluates the effectiveness of transcervical ultrasound (TUS), as well as other preoperative imaging modalities, in evaluating OPSCC volumes and compares this to post TORS pathological OPSCC volumes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one patients undergoing TORS between 2021 and 2023 were included. TUS was performed in all 41 patients, of which 37 had preoperative CT, 16 had PET-CT and 15 had MRI. Tumor dimensions on TUS, CT, and MRI were measured in craniocaudal, anteroposterior, and mediolateral planes to compute tumor volumes. Preoperative PET-CTs were analyzed to compute the metabolic tumour volume (MTV). Pathological tumor volumes served as the gold standard for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between pathological tumor volumes and those measured by TUS, CT, PET-CT, or MRI (p = 0.57, 0.47, 0.28, 0.29). Both TUS and PET-CT showed strong correlation with pathology (R = 0.92, p < 0.0001), followed by CT (R = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and MRI (R = 0.55, p = 0.031). The percent difference of radiologic volumes from pathology volumes was lowest for MRI (19.37 % ± 28.28), followed by TUS (26.12 % ± 20.97), PET-CT (32.59 % ± 21.95), and CT (39.94 % ± 62.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TUS demonstrates comparable accuracy to CT, PET-CT, and MRI in assessing primary tumor volumes in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) undergoing TORS. The strong correlation of TUS with final pathology, combined with its relatively non-invasive transcervical (versus transoral) approach and real-time acquisition, suggests that TUS has the potential to supplement TORS with image guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"107167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards transcervical ultrasound-guided transoral robotic surgery.
Background: In the context of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma (OPSCC), preoperative imaging and intraoperative visualization plays a pivotal role in optimizing resection margins. Prior work has demonstrated the ability of transoral ultrasound (US) in identifying OPSCC margins and vascular structures. This study evaluates the effectiveness of transcervical ultrasound (TUS), as well as other preoperative imaging modalities, in evaluating OPSCC volumes and compares this to post TORS pathological OPSCC volumes.
Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing TORS between 2021 and 2023 were included. TUS was performed in all 41 patients, of which 37 had preoperative CT, 16 had PET-CT and 15 had MRI. Tumor dimensions on TUS, CT, and MRI were measured in craniocaudal, anteroposterior, and mediolateral planes to compute tumor volumes. Preoperative PET-CTs were analyzed to compute the metabolic tumour volume (MTV). Pathological tumor volumes served as the gold standard for comparison.
Results: No statistically significant differences were found between pathological tumor volumes and those measured by TUS, CT, PET-CT, or MRI (p = 0.57, 0.47, 0.28, 0.29). Both TUS and PET-CT showed strong correlation with pathology (R = 0.92, p < 0.0001), followed by CT (R = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and MRI (R = 0.55, p = 0.031). The percent difference of radiologic volumes from pathology volumes was lowest for MRI (19.37 % ± 28.28), followed by TUS (26.12 % ± 20.97), PET-CT (32.59 % ± 21.95), and CT (39.94 % ± 62.94).
Conclusions: TUS demonstrates comparable accuracy to CT, PET-CT, and MRI in assessing primary tumor volumes in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) undergoing TORS. The strong correlation of TUS with final pathology, combined with its relatively non-invasive transcervical (versus transoral) approach and real-time acquisition, suggests that TUS has the potential to supplement TORS with image guidance.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.