在美国东南部的系统性红斑狼疮患者中,以黑人为主的临床试验中种族差异的看法。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Jessica Nicole Williams, Hilton Mozee, Gaobin Bao, Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas, Kim Schofield, Cristina Drenkard, Sung Sam Lim
{"title":"在美国东南部的系统性红斑狼疮患者中,以黑人为主的临床试验中种族差异的看法。","authors":"Jessica Nicole Williams, Hilton Mozee, Gaobin Bao, Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas, Kim Schofield, Cristina Drenkard, Sung Sam Lim","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Black people in the USA have a higher incidence and severity of SLE and worse outcomes, yet they are significantly under-represented in SLE clinical trials. We assessed racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large cohort of predominantly Black people with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Georgians Organised Against Lupus (GOAL) is a population-based, prospective cohort of people with a validated diagnosis of SLE living in Atlanta. The 2021-2022 GOAL survey included questions assessing knowledge, perceptions and experiences of lupus clinical trials involving drug therapy. Self-reported race was categorised as Black or non-Black. Survey responses by race were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> analyses. Among Black respondents, factors associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials were examined using univariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 767 individuals responded to the 2021-2022 GOAL survey, of whom 80% were Black. There were 720 female respondents and 47 male respondents. There was no significant difference in willingness to participate in clinical trials between Black and non-Black respondents (28% vs 31%, p=0.071). Black respondents were less likely to correctly identify the definition of a clinical trial (34% vs 70%, p<0.001). Male gender, unemployed or disabled status, governmental health insurance and higher disease activity were associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials among Black respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that only 28% of respondents were willing to participate in lupus clinical trials, with no difference by race. Efforts must continue to engage those resistant to trial participation, regardless of race. Our findings also indicate that further research is warranted to assess whether strategies such as clinical trial education and diversification of study staff may be helpful to increase Black patient recruitment. Sociodemographic factors (gender, work status, insurance status) and disease-related factors (lupus activity) may also play important roles in clinical trial participation among Black people.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large, predominantly Black cohort of people with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Southeastern USA.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Nicole Williams, Hilton Mozee, Gaobin Bao, Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas, Kim Schofield, Cristina Drenkard, Sung Sam Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2024-001357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Black people in the USA have a higher incidence and severity of SLE and worse outcomes, yet they are significantly under-represented in SLE clinical trials. We assessed racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large cohort of predominantly Black people with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Georgians Organised Against Lupus (GOAL) is a population-based, prospective cohort of people with a validated diagnosis of SLE living in Atlanta. The 2021-2022 GOAL survey included questions assessing knowledge, perceptions and experiences of lupus clinical trials involving drug therapy. Self-reported race was categorised as Black or non-Black. Survey responses by race were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> analyses. Among Black respondents, factors associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials were examined using univariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 767 individuals responded to the 2021-2022 GOAL survey, of whom 80% were Black. There were 720 female respondents and 47 male respondents. There was no significant difference in willingness to participate in clinical trials between Black and non-Black respondents (28% vs 31%, p=0.071). Black respondents were less likely to correctly identify the definition of a clinical trial (34% vs 70%, p<0.001). Male gender, unemployed or disabled status, governmental health insurance and higher disease activity were associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials among Black respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that only 28% of respondents were willing to participate in lupus clinical trials, with no difference by race. Efforts must continue to engage those resistant to trial participation, regardless of race. Our findings also indicate that further research is warranted to assess whether strategies such as clinical trial education and diversification of study staff may be helpful to increase Black patient recruitment. Sociodemographic factors (gender, work status, insurance status) and disease-related factors (lupus activity) may also play important roles in clinical trial participation among Black people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001357\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国黑人SLE的发病率和严重程度较高,预后较差,但他们在SLE临床试验中的代表性明显不足。我们在一个以黑人为主的SLE患者大队列中评估了临床试验认知的种族差异。方法:格鲁吉亚组织对抗狼疮(GOAL)是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是生活在亚特兰大的SLE确诊患者。2021-2022年GOAL调查包括评估狼疮临床试验涉及药物治疗的知识、认知和经验的问题。自我报告的种族分为黑人和非黑人。不同种族的调查结果采用χ2分析进行比较。在黑人受访者中,与参与临床试验的意愿相关的因素使用单变量逻辑回归进行检查。结果:共有767人参与了2021-2022年GOAL调查,其中80%是黑人。共有720名女性受访者和47名男性受访者。黑人和非黑人受访者参与临床试验的意愿没有显著差异(28% vs 31%, p=0.071)。黑人受访者不太可能正确识别临床试验的定义(34%对70%)。结论:我们发现只有28%的受访者愿意参加狼疮临床试验,没有种族差异。无论种族,必须继续努力吸引那些拒绝参与试验的人。我们的研究结果还表明,需要进一步的研究来评估临床试验教育和研究人员多样化等策略是否有助于增加黑人患者的招募。社会人口因素(性别、工作状况、保险状况)和疾病相关因素(红斑狼疮活动)也可能在黑人参与临床试验中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large, predominantly Black cohort of people with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Southeastern USA.

Objective: Black people in the USA have a higher incidence and severity of SLE and worse outcomes, yet they are significantly under-represented in SLE clinical trials. We assessed racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large cohort of predominantly Black people with SLE.

Methods: Georgians Organised Against Lupus (GOAL) is a population-based, prospective cohort of people with a validated diagnosis of SLE living in Atlanta. The 2021-2022 GOAL survey included questions assessing knowledge, perceptions and experiences of lupus clinical trials involving drug therapy. Self-reported race was categorised as Black or non-Black. Survey responses by race were compared using χ2 analyses. Among Black respondents, factors associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials were examined using univariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 767 individuals responded to the 2021-2022 GOAL survey, of whom 80% were Black. There were 720 female respondents and 47 male respondents. There was no significant difference in willingness to participate in clinical trials between Black and non-Black respondents (28% vs 31%, p=0.071). Black respondents were less likely to correctly identify the definition of a clinical trial (34% vs 70%, p<0.001). Male gender, unemployed or disabled status, governmental health insurance and higher disease activity were associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials among Black respondents.

Conclusions: We found that only 28% of respondents were willing to participate in lupus clinical trials, with no difference by race. Efforts must continue to engage those resistant to trial participation, regardless of race. Our findings also indicate that further research is warranted to assess whether strategies such as clinical trial education and diversification of study staff may be helpful to increase Black patient recruitment. Sociodemographic factors (gender, work status, insurance status) and disease-related factors (lupus activity) may also play important roles in clinical trial participation among Black people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信