美国临床神经生理学会关于新生儿连续脑电图监测适应症的指南。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001120
Courtney J Wusthoff, Adam L Numis, Ronit M Pressler, Catherine J Chu, Shavonne Massey, Robert R Clancy, Sylvie Nguyen, Cecil D Hahn, Mark S Scher, Betsy Pilon, Donald T King, Hong-Nei Wong, Tammy N Tsuchida, James J Riviello, Renée A Shellhaas
{"title":"美国临床神经生理学会关于新生儿连续脑电图监测适应症的指南。","authors":"Courtney J Wusthoff, Adam L Numis, Ronit M Pressler, Catherine J Chu, Shavonne Massey, Robert R Clancy, Sylvie Nguyen, Cecil D Hahn, Mark S Scher, Betsy Pilon, Donald T King, Hong-Nei Wong, Tammy N Tsuchida, James J Riviello, Renée A Shellhaas","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is increasingly used in the management of neonates with seizures. There remains debate on what clinically relevant information can be gained from cEEG in neonates with suspected seizures, at high risk for seizures, or with definite seizures, as well as the use of cEEG for prognosis in a variety of conditions. In this guideline, we address these questions using American Clinical Neurophysiology Society structured methodology for clinical guideline development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group was formed from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in neonatal cEEG and a set of priority questions developed. We performed literature searches in PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Evidence tables were compiled from extracted data and quality assessments performed. A modification of the GRADE process was used to evaluate the body of evidence and draft recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our working group identified six priority questions to evaluate the accuracy of cEEG for neonatal seizure diagnosis and the formulation of prognosis. An initial literature search yielded 18,167 results, which were distilled to a set of 217 articles. Overall, the quality of evidence for most priority questions was rated as very low and we provided conditional recommendations based on published literature and expert consensus. For each priority question, we also considered the benefits and harms of cEEG, with relative harms considered to be far less than the potential benefits across recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present evidence-based clinical guidelines regarding indications for cEEG monitoring in neonates. Considering resource utilization and feasibility, when cEEG monitoring results have a likelihood of altering clinical decision making, the authors felt the resource investment was justifiable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"42 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline on Indications for Continuous Electroencephalography Monitoring in Neonates.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney J Wusthoff, Adam L Numis, Ronit M Pressler, Catherine J Chu, Shavonne Massey, Robert R Clancy, Sylvie Nguyen, Cecil D Hahn, Mark S Scher, Betsy Pilon, Donald T King, Hong-Nei Wong, Tammy N Tsuchida, James J Riviello, Renée A Shellhaas\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is increasingly used in the management of neonates with seizures. There remains debate on what clinically relevant information can be gained from cEEG in neonates with suspected seizures, at high risk for seizures, or with definite seizures, as well as the use of cEEG for prognosis in a variety of conditions. In this guideline, we address these questions using American Clinical Neurophysiology Society structured methodology for clinical guideline development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group was formed from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in neonatal cEEG and a set of priority questions developed. We performed literature searches in PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Evidence tables were compiled from extracted data and quality assessments performed. A modification of the GRADE process was used to evaluate the body of evidence and draft recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our working group identified six priority questions to evaluate the accuracy of cEEG for neonatal seizure diagnosis and the formulation of prognosis. An initial literature search yielded 18,167 results, which were distilled to a set of 217 articles. Overall, the quality of evidence for most priority questions was rated as very low and we provided conditional recommendations based on published literature and expert consensus. For each priority question, we also considered the benefits and harms of cEEG, with relative harms considered to be far less than the potential benefits across recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present evidence-based clinical guidelines regarding indications for cEEG monitoring in neonates. Considering resource utilization and feasibility, when cEEG monitoring results have a likelihood of altering clinical decision making, the authors felt the resource investment was justifiable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:连续脑电图(cEEG)监测越来越多地应用于新生儿癫痫发作的治疗。关于脑电图在疑似癫痫发作、癫痫高风险或明确癫痫发作的新生儿中可获得哪些临床相关信息,以及脑电图在各种情况下的预后应用,仍存在争议。在本指南中,我们使用美国临床神经生理学学会的结构化方法来解决这些问题,以制定临床指南。方法:由美国临床神经生理学会成员组成一个新生儿脑电图专家工作组,并制定了一系列优先问题。我们在PubMed和EMBASE中进行文献检索以确定相关研究。根据提取的数据和进行的质量评估编制证据表。GRADE过程的修改用于评估证据体和建议草案。结果:我们的工作组确定了六个优先问题,以评估脑电图对新生儿癫痫诊断和预后制定的准确性。最初的文献检索产生了18167个结果,这些结果被提炼成一组217篇文章。总的来说,大多数优先问题的证据质量被评为非常低,我们根据已发表的文献和专家共识提供了有条件的建议。对于每个优先问题,我们还考虑了cEEG的利弊,相对危害被认为远远小于推荐的潜在益处。结论:我们提出了关于新生儿脑电图监测指征的循证临床指南。考虑到资源利用和可行性,当脑电图监测结果有可能改变临床决策时,作者认为资源投入是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline on Indications for Continuous Electroencephalography Monitoring in Neonates.

Purpose: Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is increasingly used in the management of neonates with seizures. There remains debate on what clinically relevant information can be gained from cEEG in neonates with suspected seizures, at high risk for seizures, or with definite seizures, as well as the use of cEEG for prognosis in a variety of conditions. In this guideline, we address these questions using American Clinical Neurophysiology Society structured methodology for clinical guideline development.

Methods: A working group was formed from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in neonatal cEEG and a set of priority questions developed. We performed literature searches in PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Evidence tables were compiled from extracted data and quality assessments performed. A modification of the GRADE process was used to evaluate the body of evidence and draft recommendations.

Results: Our working group identified six priority questions to evaluate the accuracy of cEEG for neonatal seizure diagnosis and the formulation of prognosis. An initial literature search yielded 18,167 results, which were distilled to a set of 217 articles. Overall, the quality of evidence for most priority questions was rated as very low and we provided conditional recommendations based on published literature and expert consensus. For each priority question, we also considered the benefits and harms of cEEG, with relative harms considered to be far less than the potential benefits across recommendations.

Conclusions: We present evidence-based clinical guidelines regarding indications for cEEG monitoring in neonates. Considering resource utilization and feasibility, when cEEG monitoring results have a likelihood of altering clinical decision making, the authors felt the resource investment was justifiable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信