Sacituzumab Govitecan作为广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的二线治疗的2期开放标签研究:来自tropic -03的结果

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Afshin Dowlati, Anne C Chiang, Andrés Cervantes, Sunil Babu, Erika Hamilton, Shu Fen Wong, Andrea Tazbirkova, Ivana Gabriela Sullivan, Cédric van Marcke, Antoine Italiano, Jilpa Patel, Sabeen Mekan, Tia Wu, Saiama N Waqar
{"title":"Sacituzumab Govitecan作为广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的二线治疗的2期开放标签研究:来自tropic -03的结果","authors":"Afshin Dowlati, Anne C Chiang, Andrés Cervantes, Sunil Babu, Erika Hamilton, Shu Fen Wong, Andrea Tazbirkova, Ivana Gabriela Sullivan, Cédric van Marcke, Antoine Italiano, Jilpa Patel, Sabeen Mekan, Tia Wu, Saiama N Waqar","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The phase 2 TROPiCS-03 study evaluated the efficacy/safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of solid tumors, including ES-SCLC. Adults with ES-SCLC that progressed after one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (PD-[L]1) therapy received SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS); blinded independent central review-assessed ORR, DOR, and PFS; overall survival (OS); and safety. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 43 patients (median follow-up, 12.3 [range, 8.1-20.1] mo), investigator-assessed ORR was 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.0%-57.9%), with 18 confirmed partial responses; median (95% CI) DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.73 (3.52-6.70), 4.40 (3.81-6.11), and 13.60 (6.57-14.78) months, respectively. The efficacy results of the blinded independent central review assessments were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR (95% CI) was 35.0% (15.4%-59.2%) in patients with platinum-resistant disease (n = 20) and 47.8% (26.8%-69.4%) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease (n = 23). Furthermore, 32 patients (74.4%) had grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No TEAE led to SG discontinuation; one treatment-related TEAE (neutropenic sepsis) led to death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG has promising efficacy as second-line treatment of ES-SCLC, irrespective of platinum sensitivity. Safety was manageable and consistent with that observed in other SG studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase 2 Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC: Results From TROPiCS-03.\",\"authors\":\"Afshin Dowlati, Anne C Chiang, Andrés Cervantes, Sunil Babu, Erika Hamilton, Shu Fen Wong, Andrea Tazbirkova, Ivana Gabriela Sullivan, Cédric van Marcke, Antoine Italiano, Jilpa Patel, Sabeen Mekan, Tia Wu, Saiama N Waqar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The phase 2 TROPiCS-03 study evaluated the efficacy/safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of solid tumors, including ES-SCLC. Adults with ES-SCLC that progressed after one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (PD-[L]1) therapy received SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS); blinded independent central review-assessed ORR, DOR, and PFS; overall survival (OS); and safety. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 43 patients (median follow-up, 12.3 [range, 8.1-20.1] mo), investigator-assessed ORR was 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.0%-57.9%), with 18 confirmed partial responses; median (95% CI) DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.73 (3.52-6.70), 4.40 (3.81-6.11), and 13.60 (6.57-14.78) months, respectively. The efficacy results of the blinded independent central review assessments were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR (95% CI) was 35.0% (15.4%-59.2%) in patients with platinum-resistant disease (n = 20) and 47.8% (26.8%-69.4%) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease (n = 23). Furthermore, 32 patients (74.4%) had grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No TEAE led to SG discontinuation; one treatment-related TEAE (neutropenic sepsis) led to death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG has promising efficacy as second-line treatment of ES-SCLC, irrespective of platinum sensitivity. Safety was manageable and consistent with that observed in other SG studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2期troics -03研究评估了sacituzumab govitecan (SG)作为先前治疗过的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的二线治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:troics -03 (NCT03964727)是一项针对实体肿瘤(包括ES-SCLC)的多队列、开放标签、2期一揽子研究。成人ES-SCLC患者在先前的铂类化疗和抗程序性死亡-(配体)- 1 (PD-[L]1)治疗后进展,在21天周期的第1天和第8天接受SG 10mg /kg。主要终点是研究者评估的客观缓解率(ORR),根据RECIST v1.1。关键次要终点包括研究者评估的缓解期(DOR)和无进展生存期(PFS);盲法独立中心评价(BICR)评估ORR、DOR和PFS;总生存期(OS);和安全。对铂耐药和铂敏感患者进行疗效评估。结果:在43例患者中(中位随访时间为12.3[范围,8.1-20.1]个月),研究者评估的ORR为41.9% (95% CI: 27.0%-57.9%),其中18例确诊部分缓解;DOR、PFS和OS的中位(95% CI)分别为4.73(3.52-6.70)、4.40(3.81-6.11)和13.60(6.57-14.78)个月。BICR评价疗效结果相似。研究者评估的铂耐药疾病患者(n=20)的ORR (95% CI)为35.0%(15.4%-59.2%),铂敏感疾病患者(n=23)的ORR为47.8%(26.8%-69.4%)。32例(74.4%)患者出现≥3级治疗不良事件(teae)。没有TEAE导致SG停药;1例治疗相关TEAE(中性粒细胞减少性败血症)导致死亡。结论:无论铂敏感性如何,SG在ES-SCLC的二线治疗中显示出良好的疗效。安全性是可控的,与其他SG研究中观察到的一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase 2 Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC: Results From TROPiCS-03.

Introduction: The phase 2 TROPiCS-03 study evaluated the efficacy/safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).

Methods: TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of solid tumors, including ES-SCLC. Adults with ES-SCLC that progressed after one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (PD-[L]1) therapy received SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS); blinded independent central review-assessed ORR, DOR, and PFS; overall survival (OS); and safety. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive disease.

Results: Among 43 patients (median follow-up, 12.3 [range, 8.1-20.1] mo), investigator-assessed ORR was 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.0%-57.9%), with 18 confirmed partial responses; median (95% CI) DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.73 (3.52-6.70), 4.40 (3.81-6.11), and 13.60 (6.57-14.78) months, respectively. The efficacy results of the blinded independent central review assessments were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR (95% CI) was 35.0% (15.4%-59.2%) in patients with platinum-resistant disease (n = 20) and 47.8% (26.8%-69.4%) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease (n = 23). Furthermore, 32 patients (74.4%) had grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No TEAE led to SG discontinuation; one treatment-related TEAE (neutropenic sepsis) led to death.

Conclusions: SG has promising efficacy as second-line treatment of ES-SCLC, irrespective of platinum sensitivity. Safety was manageable and consistent with that observed in other SG studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1406
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信