外科危重病人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的优化管理:系统综述。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.039
Ruth Zagales, Philip Lee, Sanjan Kumar, Zachary Yates, Muhammad Usman Awan, Francis Cruz, Jacob Strause, Kathleen R Schuemann, Adel Elkbuli
{"title":"外科危重病人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的优化管理:系统综述。","authors":"Ruth Zagales, Philip Lee, Sanjan Kumar, Zachary Yates, Muhammad Usman Awan, Francis Cruz, Jacob Strause, Kathleen R Schuemann, Adel Elkbuli","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill surgical patients, specifically focusing on positioning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, ventilation, fluid resuscitation, and pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted utilizing four databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ProQuest. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Studies published until May 20, 2024, that assessed the management of ARDS in critically ill surgical adult populations were included in our review. The primary outcome of interest was mortality, with secondary outcomes like intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and oxygenation also being considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of fifteen studies met inclusion criteria; four studies assessed positional interventions, four assessed treatments with ECMO, three assessed mechanical ventilation settings, and four assessed fluid resuscitation and medications. Prone position was found to decrease mortality, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and increased oxygenation (P < 0.001). ECMO utilization decreased the overall mortality rate when compared to patients without ECMO (36.4% versus 43.9%, P < 0.001). Maintaining a tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg body weight and plateau pressure ≤35 cm H<sub>2</sub>O on mechanical ventilation also decreased patient mortality (P < 0.001). Finally, conservative fluid management decreased ICU LOS, whereas methylprednisolone use demonstrated decreased mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone positioning, ECMO utilization, lung protective ventilation settings, and methylprednisolone reduced mortality among surgical patients with ARDS. In addition, prone positioning and conservative fluid management were associated with decreased ICU LOS, ventilator days, and improved oxygenation status.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"305 ","pages":"385-397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Critically Ill Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Zagales, Philip Lee, Sanjan Kumar, Zachary Yates, Muhammad Usman Awan, Francis Cruz, Jacob Strause, Kathleen R Schuemann, Adel Elkbuli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill surgical patients, specifically focusing on positioning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, ventilation, fluid resuscitation, and pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted utilizing four databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ProQuest. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Studies published until May 20, 2024, that assessed the management of ARDS in critically ill surgical adult populations were included in our review. The primary outcome of interest was mortality, with secondary outcomes like intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and oxygenation also being considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of fifteen studies met inclusion criteria; four studies assessed positional interventions, four assessed treatments with ECMO, three assessed mechanical ventilation settings, and four assessed fluid resuscitation and medications. Prone position was found to decrease mortality, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and increased oxygenation (P < 0.001). ECMO utilization decreased the overall mortality rate when compared to patients without ECMO (36.4% versus 43.9%, P < 0.001). Maintaining a tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg body weight and plateau pressure ≤35 cm H<sub>2</sub>O on mechanical ventilation also decreased patient mortality (P < 0.001). Finally, conservative fluid management decreased ICU LOS, whereas methylprednisolone use demonstrated decreased mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone positioning, ECMO utilization, lung protective ventilation settings, and methylprednisolone reduced mortality among surgical patients with ARDS. In addition, prone positioning and conservative fluid management were associated with decreased ICU LOS, ventilator days, and improved oxygenation status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"305 \",\"pages\":\"385-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在评估危重外科患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的最佳管理,特别关注体位,体外膜氧合(ECMO)的使用,通气,液体复苏和药物治疗。方法:利用PubMed、谷歌Scholar、EMBASE和ProQuest四个数据库进行系统评价。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,并在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册上注册。截至2024年5月20日发表的评估外科危重成人ARDS管理的研究纳入了我们的综述。主要结局是死亡率,次要结局如重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、呼吸机天数和氧合也被考虑在内。结果:共有15项研究符合纳入标准;4项研究评估体位干预,4项评估ECMO治疗,3项评估机械通气设置,4项评估液体复苏和药物治疗。俯卧位可降低死亡率、ICU LOS、呼吸机天数和机械通气时氧合(p2o)的增加也可降低患者死亡率(P结论:俯卧位、ECMO使用、肺保护性通气设置和甲基强的松龙可降低ARDS手术患者的死亡率。此外,俯卧位和保守的液体管理与降低ICU LOS、呼吸机天数和改善氧合状态有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Critically Ill Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill surgical patients, specifically focusing on positioning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, ventilation, fluid resuscitation, and pharmacological treatments.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted utilizing four databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ProQuest. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Studies published until May 20, 2024, that assessed the management of ARDS in critically ill surgical adult populations were included in our review. The primary outcome of interest was mortality, with secondary outcomes like intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and oxygenation also being considered.

Results: A total of fifteen studies met inclusion criteria; four studies assessed positional interventions, four assessed treatments with ECMO, three assessed mechanical ventilation settings, and four assessed fluid resuscitation and medications. Prone position was found to decrease mortality, ICU LOS, ventilator days, and increased oxygenation (P < 0.001). ECMO utilization decreased the overall mortality rate when compared to patients without ECMO (36.4% versus 43.9%, P < 0.001). Maintaining a tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg body weight and plateau pressure ≤35 cm H2O on mechanical ventilation also decreased patient mortality (P < 0.001). Finally, conservative fluid management decreased ICU LOS, whereas methylprednisolone use demonstrated decreased mortality.

Conclusions: Prone positioning, ECMO utilization, lung protective ventilation settings, and methylprednisolone reduced mortality among surgical patients with ARDS. In addition, prone positioning and conservative fluid management were associated with decreased ICU LOS, ventilator days, and improved oxygenation status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信