{"title":"单导管与双导管在老年女性经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中的比较。","authors":"Murat Kerkütlüoğlu, Enes Çelik","doi":"10.1007/s00059-024-05289-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy outcomes of the traditional Judkins left and right catheters with those of the recently introduced Tiger catheter in female participants aged 65 years and older who underwent transradial coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 160 female patients aged 65 and older who were scheduled for coronary angiography (CAG) were divided into two groups according to the use of Tiger (n = 80) or Judkins (n = 80) catheters for radial angiography at a ratio of 1:1, respectively. We analyzed the effectiveness of the Tiger and Judkins catheters, the incidence of catheter failure, contrast volume, CAG time, fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (in mGy/cm<sup>2</sup>), and the occurrence of radial spasm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Judkins catheter group had a significantly longer processing time than the Tiger catheter group, with an equivalent level of radiation exposure. The duration of fluoroscopy was longer, and the amount of contrast medium used was higher, but the frequency of radial spasm was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present investigation revealed that implementation of Tiger catheters for geriatric individuals with elevated frailty and female patients with more narrow radial artery diameters was associated with decreased overall procedure duration, contrast volume utilization, and fluoroscopy duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12863,"journal":{"name":"Herz","volume":" ","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of single-catheter with two-catheter concept in older female patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Murat Kerkütlüoğlu, Enes Çelik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00059-024-05289-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy outcomes of the traditional Judkins left and right catheters with those of the recently introduced Tiger catheter in female participants aged 65 years and older who underwent transradial coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 160 female patients aged 65 and older who were scheduled for coronary angiography (CAG) were divided into two groups according to the use of Tiger (n = 80) or Judkins (n = 80) catheters for radial angiography at a ratio of 1:1, respectively. We analyzed the effectiveness of the Tiger and Judkins catheters, the incidence of catheter failure, contrast volume, CAG time, fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (in mGy/cm<sup>2</sup>), and the occurrence of radial spasm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Judkins catheter group had a significantly longer processing time than the Tiger catheter group, with an equivalent level of radiation exposure. The duration of fluoroscopy was longer, and the amount of contrast medium used was higher, but the frequency of radial spasm was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present investigation revealed that implementation of Tiger catheters for geriatric individuals with elevated frailty and female patients with more narrow radial artery diameters was associated with decreased overall procedure duration, contrast volume utilization, and fluoroscopy duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"59-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-024-05289-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-024-05289-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of single-catheter with two-catheter concept in older female patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography.
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy outcomes of the traditional Judkins left and right catheters with those of the recently introduced Tiger catheter in female participants aged 65 years and older who underwent transradial coronary angiography.
Methods: A cohort of 160 female patients aged 65 and older who were scheduled for coronary angiography (CAG) were divided into two groups according to the use of Tiger (n = 80) or Judkins (n = 80) catheters for radial angiography at a ratio of 1:1, respectively. We analyzed the effectiveness of the Tiger and Judkins catheters, the incidence of catheter failure, contrast volume, CAG time, fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (in mGy/cm2), and the occurrence of radial spasm.
Results: The Judkins catheter group had a significantly longer processing time than the Tiger catheter group, with an equivalent level of radiation exposure. The duration of fluoroscopy was longer, and the amount of contrast medium used was higher, but the frequency of radial spasm was not significantly different.
Conclusion: The present investigation revealed that implementation of Tiger catheters for geriatric individuals with elevated frailty and female patients with more narrow radial artery diameters was associated with decreased overall procedure duration, contrast volume utilization, and fluoroscopy duration.
期刊介绍：
Herz is the high-level journal for further education for all physicians interested in cardiology. The individual issues of the journal each deal with specific topics and comprise review articles in English and German written by competent and esteemed authors. They provide up-to-date and comprehensive information concerning the speciality dealt with in the issue. Due to the fact that all relevant aspects of the pertinent topic of an issue are considered, an overview of the current status and progress in cardiology is presented. Reviews and original articles round off the spectrum of information provided.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
