Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测肺结核和利福平耐药性的诊断准确性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Man-Qing Wang, Ya-Fang Zheng, Yu-Qi Hu, Jin-Xia Huang, Zi-Xin Yuan, Zu-Yan Wu, Lu-Fang Huang, Chu-Ting Tang, Feng-Yi Zhang, Yan Chen, Jin-Ke He, Xu-Guang Guo, Bao-Mei Yan
{"title":"Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测肺结核和利福平耐药性的诊断准确性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Man-Qing Wang, Ya-Fang Zheng, Yu-Qi Hu, Jin-Xia Huang, Zi-Xin Yuan, Zu-Yan Wu, Lu-Fang Huang, Chu-Ting Tang, Feng-Yi Zhang, Yan Chen, Jin-Ke He, Xu-Guang Guo, Bao-Mei Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10096-024-05032-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health issues related to tuberculosis still exist. Because Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is more effective than conventional TB diagnostic techniques are, it is now regarded as an emerging technology. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis was assessed in this systematic study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for pertinent literature published before January 18, 2024. The quality of the collected literature was assessed via Review Manager 5.3 software, which applies the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies criteria. Using Metadisc 1.40 software, the sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and examined. Stata 12.0 was the program we utilized to assess publication bias in this investigation. The Prospero prospective register of systematic reviews included this study (reference number CRD42024569674).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 187 fourfold tables from 72 studies revealed that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra demonstrated an overall pooled sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 95% for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 14.91, and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.23, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9351 and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 73.39. For detecting rifampin resistance, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively. The pooled PLR was 24.94, the NLR was 0.07, and the DOR was 429.05. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.9868.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, developing effective laboratory diagnostic tools for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential for epidemiological research. This study demonstrated that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra effectively diagnosed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, including pulmonary tuberculosis, as well as rifampin resistance, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for both diagnosis and resistance detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Man-Qing Wang, Ya-Fang Zheng, Yu-Qi Hu, Jin-Xia Huang, Zi-Xin Yuan, Zu-Yan Wu, Lu-Fang Huang, Chu-Ting Tang, Feng-Yi Zhang, Yan Chen, Jin-Ke He, Xu-Guang Guo, Bao-Mei Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10096-024-05032-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health issues related to tuberculosis still exist. Because Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is more effective than conventional TB diagnostic techniques are, it is now regarded as an emerging technology. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis was assessed in this systematic study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for pertinent literature published before January 18, 2024. The quality of the collected literature was assessed via Review Manager 5.3 software, which applies the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies criteria. Using Metadisc 1.40 software, the sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and examined. Stata 12.0 was the program we utilized to assess publication bias in this investigation. The Prospero prospective register of systematic reviews included this study (reference number CRD42024569674).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 187 fourfold tables from 72 studies revealed that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra demonstrated an overall pooled sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 95% for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 14.91, and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.23, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9351 and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 73.39. For detecting rifampin resistance, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively. The pooled PLR was 24.94, the NLR was 0.07, and the DOR was 429.05. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.9868.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, developing effective laboratory diagnostic tools for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential for epidemiological research. This study demonstrated that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra effectively diagnosed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, including pulmonary tuberculosis, as well as rifampin resistance, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for both diagnosis and resistance detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-05032-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-05032-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与结核病有关的公共卫生问题仍然存在。由于专家MTB/RIF Ultra比传统的结核病诊断技术更有效,它现在被视为一种新兴技术。本系统研究评估了Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra对结核病的诊断准确性。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库,检索2024年1月18日前发表的相关文献。收集文献的质量通过Review Manager 5.3软件进行评估,该软件应用诊断准确性研究标准的质量评估。使用Metadisc 1.40软件,绘制并检查敏感性、特异性和总体受试者工作特征曲线。Stata 12.0是我们在本研究中用于评估发表偏倚的程序。普洛斯彼罗前瞻性系统评价登记纳入了本研究(参考号CRD42024569674)。结果:对72项研究的187个四重表的分析显示,Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测肺结核的总总敏感性为76%,特异性为95%。阳性似然比(PLR)为14.91,阴性似然比(NLR)为0.23,曲线下面积为0.9351,诊断优势比(DOR)为73.39。检测利福平耐药的敏感性和特异性分别为94%和97%。合并PLR为24.94,NLR为0.07,DOR为429.05。受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线下面积为0.9868。结论:开发有效的实验室诊断工具对流行病学研究具有重要意义。这项研究表明,Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra有效地诊断了结核分枝杆菌感染,包括肺结核,以及利福平耐药性,突出了其作为诊断和耐药性检测的有价值工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Public health issues related to tuberculosis still exist. Because Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is more effective than conventional TB diagnostic techniques are, it is now regarded as an emerging technology. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis was assessed in this systematic study.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for pertinent literature published before January 18, 2024. The quality of the collected literature was assessed via Review Manager 5.3 software, which applies the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies criteria. Using Metadisc 1.40 software, the sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and examined. Stata 12.0 was the program we utilized to assess publication bias in this investigation. The Prospero prospective register of systematic reviews included this study (reference number CRD42024569674).

Results: Analysis of 187 fourfold tables from 72 studies revealed that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra demonstrated an overall pooled sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 95% for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 14.91, and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.23, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9351 and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 73.39. For detecting rifampin resistance, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively. The pooled PLR was 24.94, the NLR was 0.07, and the DOR was 429.05. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.9868.

Conclusion: In conclusion, developing effective laboratory diagnostic tools for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential for epidemiological research. This study demonstrated that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra effectively diagnosed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, including pulmonary tuberculosis, as well as rifampin resistance, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for both diagnosis and resistance detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信