Sarah Roger, Samantha Estevez, Carlos Hernandez-Nieto, Shawn Kripalani, Atoosa Ghofranian, Morgan Baird, Joseph Lee, Richard Slifkin, Christine Briton-Jones, Alan Copperman, Rachel Danis
{"title":"冷冻保存的时间与解冻存活率、受精率、囊胚率、倍性或玻璃化人类卵母细胞的妊娠结局无关。","authors":"Sarah Roger, Samantha Estevez, Carlos Hernandez-Nieto, Shawn Kripalani, Atoosa Ghofranian, Morgan Baird, Joseph Lee, Richard Slifkin, Christine Briton-Jones, Alan Copperman, Rachel Danis","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03350-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is to evaluate duration of oocyte cryostorage and association with thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation, ploidy rates, and pregnancy outcomes in patients seeking fertility preservation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent fertility preservation from 2011 to 2023 via oocyte vitrification for non-oncologic indications. Primary outcome was thaw survival rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of fertilization, blastulation and embryo ploidy, as well asn pregnancy outcomes. Demographic, controlled ovarian stimulation, and laboratory data were collected for each patient. Analyses were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact test, or Chi-squared test, as appropriate. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized, and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Group A as the reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5995 oocytes met inclusion criteria. These were divided into quartiles based on duration of cryostorage. Group A included oocytes in cryostorage for 0-2 years; Group B, 3-5 years; and Group C, 6-11 years. Significant differences were found when comparing thaw survival (p < 0.0001), fertilization (p = 0.0009), and blastulation rates (p = 0.0002) among groups; however, no significant differences were seen after multivariate GEE regression analysis. No significant differences were seen in rates of euploidy (p = 0.70), live birth (p = 0.81), and clinical pregnancy (p = 0.58) among groups. After analyzing years in cryostorage as a continuous variable and controlling for confounders, duration of cryostorage was not related to odds of thaw, fertilization, blastulation, euploid rates, or pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Length of time in cryostorage is not associated with compromised rates of oocyte thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation, ploidy, or pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of cryostorage is not associated with rates of thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation and ploidy, or pregnancy outcomes of vitrified human oocytes.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Roger, Samantha Estevez, Carlos Hernandez-Nieto, Shawn Kripalani, Atoosa Ghofranian, Morgan Baird, Joseph Lee, Richard Slifkin, Christine Briton-Jones, Alan Copperman, Rachel Danis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-024-03350-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is to evaluate duration of oocyte cryostorage and association with thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation, ploidy rates, and pregnancy outcomes in patients seeking fertility preservation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent fertility preservation from 2011 to 2023 via oocyte vitrification for non-oncologic indications. Primary outcome was thaw survival rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of fertilization, blastulation and embryo ploidy, as well asn pregnancy outcomes. Demographic, controlled ovarian stimulation, and laboratory data were collected for each patient. Analyses were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact test, or Chi-squared test, as appropriate. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized, and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Group A as the reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5995 oocytes met inclusion criteria. These were divided into quartiles based on duration of cryostorage. Group A included oocytes in cryostorage for 0-2 years; Group B, 3-5 years; and Group C, 6-11 years. Significant differences were found when comparing thaw survival (p < 0.0001), fertilization (p = 0.0009), and blastulation rates (p = 0.0002) among groups; however, no significant differences were seen after multivariate GEE regression analysis. No significant differences were seen in rates of euploidy (p = 0.70), live birth (p = 0.81), and clinical pregnancy (p = 0.58) among groups. After analyzing years in cryostorage as a continuous variable and controlling for confounders, duration of cryostorage was not related to odds of thaw, fertilization, blastulation, euploid rates, or pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Length of time in cryostorage is not associated with compromised rates of oocyte thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation, ploidy, or pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03350-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03350-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Duration of cryostorage is not associated with rates of thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation and ploidy, or pregnancy outcomes of vitrified human oocytes.
Purpose: This study is to evaluate duration of oocyte cryostorage and association with thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation, ploidy rates, and pregnancy outcomes in patients seeking fertility preservation.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent fertility preservation from 2011 to 2023 via oocyte vitrification for non-oncologic indications. Primary outcome was thaw survival rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of fertilization, blastulation and embryo ploidy, as well asn pregnancy outcomes. Demographic, controlled ovarian stimulation, and laboratory data were collected for each patient. Analyses were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact test, or Chi-squared test, as appropriate. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized, and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Group A as the reference group.
Results: A total of 5995 oocytes met inclusion criteria. These were divided into quartiles based on duration of cryostorage. Group A included oocytes in cryostorage for 0-2 years; Group B, 3-5 years; and Group C, 6-11 years. Significant differences were found when comparing thaw survival (p < 0.0001), fertilization (p = 0.0009), and blastulation rates (p = 0.0002) among groups; however, no significant differences were seen after multivariate GEE regression analysis. No significant differences were seen in rates of euploidy (p = 0.70), live birth (p = 0.81), and clinical pregnancy (p = 0.58) among groups. After analyzing years in cryostorage as a continuous variable and controlling for confounders, duration of cryostorage was not related to odds of thaw, fertilization, blastulation, euploid rates, or pregnancy outcomes.
Conclusion: Length of time in cryostorage is not associated with compromised rates of oocyte thaw survival, fertilization, blastulation, ploidy, or pregnancy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.