古老丛林中的必需品？论汉对起源必要性的分析

Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x

Dongwoo Kim

{"title":"古老丛林中的必需品？论汉对起源必要性的分析","authors":"Dongwoo Kim","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>I shall discuss Han’s analysis of the necessity of origin theses. His analysis comes in two parts. The negative part argues that well-known Kripkean arguments leave an inferential gap, thus falling short of establishing the necessity of origin theses. The positive part contends that the gap can only be bridged by Aristotelian metaphysics of essence and causation. I shall critically examine both the negative and positive parts of Han’s analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Necessities in the old jungle?: On Han’s analysis of the necessity of origin\",\"authors\":\"Dongwoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>I shall discuss Han’s analysis of the necessity of origin theses. His analysis comes in two parts. The negative part argues that well-known Kripkean arguments leave an inferential gap, thus falling short of establishing the necessity of origin theses. The positive part contends that the gap can only be bridged by Aristotelian metaphysics of essence and causation. I shall critically examine both the negative and positive parts of Han’s analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-024-00235-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我将讨论韩对起源论题必要性的分析。他的分析分为两部分。否定的部分认为著名的克里普金论点留下了一个推理的空白，因此无法建立起源的必要性论点。积极的部分认为，只有亚里士多德的本质和因果形而上学才能弥合这一鸿沟。我将批判性地审视韩的分析的消极和积极的部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Necessities in the old jungle?: On Han’s analysis of the necessity of origin

I shall discuss Han’s analysis of the necessity of origin theses. His analysis comes in two parts. The negative part argues that well-known Kripkean arguments leave an inferential gap, thus falling short of establishing the necessity of origin theses. The positive part contends that the gap can only be bridged by Aristotelian metaphysics of essence and causation. I shall critically examine both the negative and positive parts of Han’s analysis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian journal of philosophy

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量