成人骨-软组织与纯软组织同种异体移植的 ACLR 失败率较低:系统回顾和元分析

Ameer Tabbaa, Myles Atkins, Alicia M. Montalvo, Camryn B. Petit, Mia S. White, Erich J. Petushek, Jed A. Diekfuss, Gregory D. Myer, Joseph D. Lamplot
{"title":"成人骨-软组织与纯软组织同种异体移植的 ACLR 失败率较低:系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Ameer Tabbaa, Myles Atkins, Alicia M. Montalvo, Camryn B. Petit, Mia S. White, Erich J. Petushek, Jed A. Diekfuss, Gregory D. Myer, Joseph D. Lamplot","doi":"10.1177/03635465241250016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:While allografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), evidence to guide specific allograft selection is lacking.Purpose:To compare clinical and graft failure rates after ACLR using soft tissue–only allografts and bone–soft tissue allografts in adults.Study Design:Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:English-language studies with clinical outcome data on primary and revision ACLR in adults with nonirradiated soft tissue–only and bone–soft tissue grafts were identified in the search. Data extracted included allograft type, patient characteristics, follow-up time, and failure rates. The cumulative failure rate was defined as International Knee Documentation Committee grade C/D, graft retear, grade ≥2+ Lachman, grade ≥2+ pivot shift, and/or side-to-side KT-1000 laxity of >5 mm. The graft rupture rate was defined solely by the proportion of patients who had a graft rupture. Meta-analyses using the inverse variance method were used to estimate the pooled rates with 95% CIs. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare allograft types and determine whether age, sex, and follow-up time influenced the estimates.Results:A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: 7 investigated bone–soft tissue allografts, 6 investigated soft tissue–only allografts, and 1 investigated both. The comparative study showed a difference in the cumulative failure rate between bone–patellar tendon–bone and soft tissue–only allografts. The pooled cumulative failure rates for bone–soft tissue and soft tissue–only allografts were 11% (95% CI, 7-17) and 20% (95% CI, 14-29), respectively ( P = .05). The pooled graft rupture rates for bone–soft tissue and soft tissue–only allografts were 6% (95% CI, 4-9) and 13% (95% CI, 7-23), respectively ( P = .07).Conclusion:The meta-analysis results showed that bone–soft tissue allografts have lower cumulative failure rates than soft tissue–only allografts. Bone–soft tissue allografts may be the preferred allograft choices for ACLR.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower ACLR Failure Rates in Bone–Soft Tissue Versus Soft Tissue–Only Allografts in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ameer Tabbaa, Myles Atkins, Alicia M. Montalvo, Camryn B. Petit, Mia S. White, Erich J. Petushek, Jed A. Diekfuss, Gregory D. Myer, Joseph D. Lamplot\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241250016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:While allografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), evidence to guide specific allograft selection is lacking.Purpose:To compare clinical and graft failure rates after ACLR using soft tissue–only allografts and bone–soft tissue allografts in adults.Study Design:Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:English-language studies with clinical outcome data on primary and revision ACLR in adults with nonirradiated soft tissue–only and bone–soft tissue grafts were identified in the search. Data extracted included allograft type, patient characteristics, follow-up time, and failure rates. The cumulative failure rate was defined as International Knee Documentation Committee grade C/D, graft retear, grade ≥2+ Lachman, grade ≥2+ pivot shift, and/or side-to-side KT-1000 laxity of >5 mm. The graft rupture rate was defined solely by the proportion of patients who had a graft rupture. Meta-analyses using the inverse variance method were used to estimate the pooled rates with 95% CIs. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare allograft types and determine whether age, sex, and follow-up time influenced the estimates.Results:A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: 7 investigated bone–soft tissue allografts, 6 investigated soft tissue–only allografts, and 1 investigated both. The comparative study showed a difference in the cumulative failure rate between bone–patellar tendon–bone and soft tissue–only allografts. The pooled cumulative failure rates for bone–soft tissue and soft tissue–only allografts were 11% (95% CI, 7-17) and 20% (95% CI, 14-29), respectively ( P = .05). The pooled graft rupture rates for bone–soft tissue and soft tissue–only allografts were 6% (95% CI, 4-9) and 13% (95% CI, 7-23), respectively ( P = .07).Conclusion:The meta-analysis results showed that bone–soft tissue allografts have lower cumulative failure rates than soft tissue–only allografts. Bone–soft tissue allografts may be the preferred allograft choices for ACLR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241250016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241250016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然同种异体移植通常用于前交叉韧带重建(ACLR),但缺乏指导特定同种异体移植选择的证据。目的:比较成人ACLR术后单纯软组织同种异体移植和骨-软组织同种异体移植的临床失败率和移植物失败率。研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析;证据等级,4级。方法:在搜索中确定了非辐照软组织和骨-软组织移植成人原发性和改良ACLR的临床结果数据的英语研究。提取的数据包括同种异体移植物类型、患者特征、随访时间和失败率。累积失败率定义为国际膝关节文献委员会C/D级,移骨复位,≥2级+ Lachman级,≥2级+枢轴移位,和/或左右KT-1000松弛度为5毫米。移植物破裂率仅由发生移植物破裂的患者比例来定义。采用反方差法进行meta分析,以95% ci估计合并发生率。亚组分析比较同种异体移植物类型,并确定年龄、性别和随访时间是否影响估计。结果:共有14项研究符合纳入标准:7项研究骨-软组织同种异体移植,6项研究仅软组织同种异体移植,1项研究两者都研究。对比研究显示骨-髌骨-肌腱-骨与仅软组织同种异体移植物的累积失败率存在差异。骨-软组织和仅软组织同种异体移植的累积失败率分别为11% (95% CI, 7-17)和20% (95% CI, 14-29) (P = 0.05)。骨-软组织和仅软组织同种异体移植物的总移植破裂率分别为6% (95% CI, 4-9)和13% (95% CI, 7-23) (P = 0.07)。结论:meta分析结果显示,骨-软组织同种异体移植比单纯软组织同种异体移植具有更低的累积失败率。骨-软组织异体移植可能是ACLR的首选异体移植选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower ACLR Failure Rates in Bone–Soft Tissue Versus Soft Tissue–Only Allografts in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Background:While allografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), evidence to guide specific allograft selection is lacking.Purpose:To compare clinical and graft failure rates after ACLR using soft tissue–only allografts and bone–soft tissue allografts in adults.Study Design:Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:English-language studies with clinical outcome data on primary and revision ACLR in adults with nonirradiated soft tissue–only and bone–soft tissue grafts were identified in the search. Data extracted included allograft type, patient characteristics, follow-up time, and failure rates. The cumulative failure rate was defined as International Knee Documentation Committee grade C/D, graft retear, grade ≥2+ Lachman, grade ≥2+ pivot shift, and/or side-to-side KT-1000 laxity of >5 mm. The graft rupture rate was defined solely by the proportion of patients who had a graft rupture. Meta-analyses using the inverse variance method were used to estimate the pooled rates with 95% CIs. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare allograft types and determine whether age, sex, and follow-up time influenced the estimates.Results:A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: 7 investigated bone–soft tissue allografts, 6 investigated soft tissue–only allografts, and 1 investigated both. The comparative study showed a difference in the cumulative failure rate between bone–patellar tendon–bone and soft tissue–only allografts. The pooled cumulative failure rates for bone–soft tissue and soft tissue–only allografts were 11% (95% CI, 7-17) and 20% (95% CI, 14-29), respectively ( P = .05). The pooled graft rupture rates for bone–soft tissue and soft tissue–only allografts were 6% (95% CI, 4-9) and 13% (95% CI, 7-23), respectively ( P = .07).Conclusion:The meta-analysis results showed that bone–soft tissue allografts have lower cumulative failure rates than soft tissue–only allografts. Bone–soft tissue allografts may be the preferred allograft choices for ACLR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信